Diagnostic performance of computed tomography colonography and colonoscopy: A prospective and validated analysis of 231 paired examinations

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 48, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 831-837

  Arnesen, R B ^a   Von Benzon, E ^a   Adamsen, S ^a   Svendsen, L B ^a   Raaschou, H O ^a   Hansen, O Hart ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Abdomen GI; Adults; Endoscopy procedures; Large bowel; Spiral CT; Virtual imaging

Indexed keywords

ENDOSCOPY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; ONCOLOGY; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; RADIOLOGY; TOMOGRAPHY; TUMORS;

ABDOMEN/GI; ADULTS; COLONOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPY PROCEDURES; LARGE BOWEL; SPIRAL CT; VIRTUAL IMAGING;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

BARIUM; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECONOMICS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR RECURRENCE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BARIUM; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 35148877122     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850701422096     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adamsen S, Mosbach K, Miliam P, Hansen OH. Injuries in colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy requiring laparotomy. Ugeskr Laeger 2007;169:1788-93.
2. Arnesen RB, Ginnerup-Pedersen B, Poulsen PB, von Benzon E, Adamsen S, Laurberg S, et al. Costeffectiveness of computed tomographic tomography. A prospective comparison with colonoscopy. Acta Radiol 2007;48:259-66.
3. Arnesen R, Adamsen S, Svendsen LB, Raaschou HO, von Benzon E, Hansen O. Missed lesions and falsepositive findings on computed-tomographic colonography: a controlled prospective analysis. Endoscopy 2005;37:937-44.
4. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, Palesch YY, Mauldin PD, Hoffman B, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004;291:1713-9.
5. Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, Palesch YY, Mauldin PD, Hoffman B, Vining DJ. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy). A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004;291:1713-8.
6. Edwards JT, Mendelson RM, Fritschi L, Foster NM, Wood C, Murray D, et al. Colorectal neoplasia screening with CT colonography in average-risk asymptomatic subjects: community-based study. Radiology 2004;230: 459-64.
7. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC III, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1496-503.
8. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor J, Mallet S, Deeks JJ, Bartram CI, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, metaanalysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005;237:893-904.
9. Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, McCollough CH, Harmsen WS. CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 2001;219:461-5.
10. Iannaccone R, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, Murakami T, Lamazza A, Fiori E, et al. Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies. Radiology 2005;237:927-37.
11. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, Lamazza A, Schillaci A, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2004;127:1300-11.
12. Isenberg GA, Ginsberg GG, Barkun AN, Bosco JJ, Nguyen CC, Petersen BT, et al. Technology status evaluation report. Virtual colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endose 2003;57:451-4.
13. Jentschura D, Raute M, Winter J, Henkel T, Kraus M, Manegold BC. Complications in endoscopy of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Therapy and prognosis. Surg Endose 1994;8:672-6.
14. Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, Maccarty RL, Wlech TJ, Ilst DM, et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of CT colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003;125:311-9.
15. Mendeleson RM, Foster NM, Edwards JT, Wood CJ, Rosenberg MS, Forbes GM. Virtual colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy: a developing technology. Med J Austr 2000;173:472-5.
16. Neri E, Vannozzi F, Vagli P, Bardine A, Bartolozzi C. Time efficiency of CT colonography: 2D vs 3D visualization. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2006;30: 175-80.
17. Nielsen H, Department of Radiology, Hillerød Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark, Personal communication.
18. Pescatore P, Glucker T, Delarive J, Meuli R, Pantoflickova D, Duvoisin B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gut 2000;47:126-30.
19. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett MD, Hildebrandt HA, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2191-200.
20. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR. Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1343-7.
21. Pineau BC, Paskett ED, Chen GJ, Espeland MA, Phillips K, Han JP, et al. Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003;125:304-10.
22. Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A, Dixon MF, Yoshida S, Chalmers DM, et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 2000;355:1211-4.
23. Reuterskiold MH, Lasson A, Svensson E, Kilander A, Stotzer PO, Hellstrom M. Diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients and in patients with increased risk for colorectal disease. Acta Radiol 2006;47:888-98.
24. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rhamani EY, Clark DW, Helper GA, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112:292-4.
25. Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, Davis W, Bosworth HB, Sanders L, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005;365:305-11.
26. Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Lavin PT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V. CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1598.
27. Taylor J, Halligan S, Saunders BP, Morley S, Riesewyk C, Atkin W, et al. Use of multidetector-row CT colonography for detection of colorectal neoplasia in patients referred via the Department of Health "2-WeekWait" initiative. Clin Radiol 2003;58:855-61.
28. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Slater A, Goh V, Burling DN, Roddie ME, et al. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software. Radiology 2006;239:759-67.
29. van Dam J, Cotton PB, Johnson CD, McFarland EG, Pineau BC, Provenzale D, et al. AGA future trends report: CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2004;127: 970-84.
30. Wessling R, Domagk D, Lugering N, Schierhorn S, Heindal W, Domschke W, et al. Virtual colonography:identification and differentiation of colorectal lesions using multi-detector computed tomography. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005;40:468-76.
31. Wessling R, Fischbach R, Domagk D, Lugering N, Neumann E, Heindal W. Colorectal polyps: detection with multi-slice CT colonography. Rofo 2001; 173: 1069-71.
32. Winawer SJ, Stewart ET, Zauber AG, Bond JH, Ansel H, Waye JD, et al. A comparison of colonoscopyand double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1766-72.
33. Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001;3:685-92.
34. Zalis ME, Hahn PF. Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:646-8.