Opening communicative space: A Habermasian understanding of a user-led participatory research project

Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 452-469

  Godin, Paul ^a   Davies, Jacqueline ^a   Heyman, Bob ^a   Reynolds, Lisa ^a   Simpson, Alan ^a   Floyd, Mike ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Communicative action; Forensic mental health care; Habermas; Participatory research; User involvement in research; User led research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POLITICAL SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 35148868262     PISSN: 14789949     EISSN: 14789957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14789940701470283     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Crossley, N. (2000) Emotions, psychiatry and social order: A Habermasian approach. Health medicine and society: Key theories, future agendas, pp. 277-295. Routledge, London
2. Ellacuria, I. (1991) Is a different university possible?. Towards a society that serves its people, pp. 177-207. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC
3. Faulkner, A. and Morris, B. (2003) Expert paper: User involvement in forensic mental health research and development, NHS National Programme on Forensic Mental Health Research and Development, Liverpool, UK
4. Friere, P. (1970) The pedagogy of the oppressed, Seabury Press, New York
5. Habermas, J. (1974) Theory and practice, Heinemann, London
6. Habermas, J. (1981) New social movements. Telos, 48, pp. 33-37.
7. Habermas, J. (1984) The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and rationalization of society, Heinemann, London
8. Habermas, J. (1989) The structural transformation of the public sphere, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
9. Hodge, S. (2005) Participation, discourse and power: A case study in service user involvement. Critical Social Policy, 25, pp. 164-179.
10. Hodge, S. (2005) Competence, identity and intersubjectivity: Applying Habermas's theory of communicative action to service user involvement in mental health policy making. Social Theory and Health, 3, pp. 165-182.
11. Kellner, D. (2000) Habermas, the public sphere, and democracy: A critical intervention. Perspectives on Habermas, pp. 259-288. Open Court Press, Chicago
12. Kemmis, S. (2001) Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jurgen Habermas. Handbook to action research: Participative inquiry and practice, pp. 91-102. Sage, London
13. Mishler, E. (1984) The discourses of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews, Ablex, Norwood, NJ
14. National Forensic Mental Health R&D Programme (2006) Engaging service users in the evaluation and development of forensic mental health care services
15. Oliver, M. (1992) Changing the social relationship of research production?. Disability, Handicap and Society, 7, pp. 101-114.
16. Outhwaite, W. (1994) Habermas: A critical introduction, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK
17. Roger, A. and Pilgrim, D. (2005) A sociology of mental health and illness, Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berkshire
18. Scambler, G. (1987) Habermas and the power of medical expertise. Sociological theory and medical sociology, pp. 165-193. Tavistock, London
19. Scambler, G. and Britten, N. (2001) Systems, lifeworld and doctor - patient interaction: Issues of trust in a changing world. Habermas, critical theory and health, pp. 45-67. Routledge, London
20. Zarb, G. (1992) On the road to Damascus: First steps towards changing the relations of disability research production. Disability, Handicap and Society, 7, pp. 125-138.