Revisiting the university front

Studies in Philosophy and Education

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 405-418

  Lock, Grahame ^a   Lorenz, Chris ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Academic audit; Governance; Knowledge society; Managerialism; Postdemocracy; Public function of the university; Quality control; Research university

Indexed keywords

EID: 35148851501     PISSN: 00393746     EISSN: 1573191X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11217-007-9052-4     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alonso, C. S. (2003). European union: The threat to education. IV Online magazine, November. Retrieved October 11, 2006, from www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article120.
2. Balzer, C., & Martens, K. (2004). International higher education and the Bologna process: What part does the European Commission play? (Paper presented to the epsNet 2004 Plenary Conference on Political science after the EU enlargement, Prague, June 18-19).
3. Barry, B. (1965). Political argument. London: Routledge.
4. Barry, J., & Dent, M. (2004). New public management and the professions in the UK. Reconfiguring control? In M. Dent, J. Chandler & J. Berry (Eds.), Questioning the new public management (pp. 7-20). Aldershot: Ashgate.
5. Brooks, R. L. (2005). Measuring university quality. The Review of Higher Education, 29(1), 1-21.
6. Brown, J. (2001). De la gouvernance ou la constitution politique du néo-libéralisme. Retrieved October 11, 2006, from http://www.attac.org/fra/list/doc/brown.htm.
7. Brunkhorst, H. (2006). So wird Sachzwang gebaut. Die Tageszeitung, Berlin, August 12.
8. Charlton, B. (2000). Shape of things coming. Oxford Magazine, 182, 1-3.
9. Charlton, B. (2001). If not quality assurance, then what? Spiked Culture. Retrieved October 11, 2006, from http://www.spiked-online.com/ Articles/00000002D20D.htm.
10. Charlton, B. (2002). Audit, accountability, quality and all that: The growth of managerial technologies in UK Universities. Retrieved October 11, 2006, from http://www.hedweb.com/bgcharlton/audit.html.
11. Charlton, B., & Andras, P. (2002). Auditing as a tool of public policy. The misuse of quality assurance techniques in the UK university expansion. European Political Science, 2, 24-35.
12. Crouch, C. (2004). Postdemocracy. London: Polity Press.
13. Crouch, C. (2005). Coping with Post-democracy (POWER Inquiry Witness Session, Manchester, 28 April). Retrieved October 11, 2006, at http://www.fabian-society.org.uk/net.asp.
14. EAIE (European Association for International Education) (1992). International education in Europe: A professional view on the Memorandum on Higher Education in the European Community. Amsterdam: EAIE.
15. Evans, M. (2004). Killing thinking: The death of the universities. London: Continuum.
16. Fejes, A. (2005). The Bologna process - Governing higher education in Europe through standardisation. (Paper presented to the third conference on Knowledge and Politics: The Bologna process and the shaping of the future knowledge societies, University of Bergen, Norway, May 18-20).
17. Galan, C. (2006). La libéralisation de l'enseignement supérieur au Japon. (Paper presented to the ARESER Colloquium L'Université a-t-elle encore un avenir en Europe? Paris, February 11).
18. Gombrich, R. (2000). British higher education policy in the last twenty years: The murder of a profession. Retrieved October 11, 2006, from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucgadkw/position/gombrich/uk-higher-education.html.
19. Harvey, L. (2003). The power of accreditation: Views of academics. (Paper presented to the ENQA Workshop on Accreditation Models in Higher Education, November 12-15).
20. Hoggett, P. (2003). Why public is not the same as private. Retrieved October 11, 2006, from http://www.ispso.org/Symposia/Boston/hoggett.htm, 2003.
21. Johnson, B., Kavanagh, P., & Mattison, K. (2003). Steal this university: The rise of the corporate university and the academic labor movement. New York: Routledge.
22. Jourde, P. (2003). Ce qui tue l'Université française. Le Monde Diplomatique, September 2003.
23. Klukhuhn, A. (2002). Rather the poisoned chalice: On universities and the market. Retrieved October 11, 2006, from http://www.phys.uu.nl/ ∼kritstud/eklukhuhn.htm.
24. Legendre, P. (1988). Le Désir politique de Dieu. Paris: Fayard.
25. Leys, C. (2003). Market-driven politics: Neoliberal democracy and the public interest. London: Verso.
26. Lock, G. (1989). The collectivisation of the Dutch universities. Minerva, 27(2-3), 157-176.
27. Lock, G. (2006). Watching out for 'governance': The nature and future of an illusion. Episteme. Revista de Epistemologia e Historia das Ciencias, ano VI, nos. 15-16-17, 19-37.
28. Lorenz, C. (1993). Van het universitair front geen nieuws. Baarn: AMBO.
29. Lorenz, C. (2000). The myth of the Dutch middle way. Wissenschaftsrecht, 33, 189-209.
30. Lorenz, C. (2006a). Dutch university governance and the Bologna Declaration. Oxford Magazine, 250, 4-6.
31. Lorenz, C. (2006b). Will the universities survive the European Integration? Higher education policies in the EU and in the Netherlands before and after the Bologna Declaration. Sociologia Internationalis, 1, 1-29.
32. Marsh, S., & Macalpine, M. (2002). Perversity and absurdity in 'high managerialism'. (Paper presented to the Connecting Learning and Critique Conference, Cambridge.).
33. Martins, H. (2004). The marketisation of universities and some cultural contradictions of academic capitalism. Metacrítica, Revista de filosofia, 4, 2004; extended version retrieved October 11, 2006, from http://www.adelinotorres.com/sociologia.htm.
34. Mattei, U. (2003). A theory of imperial law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 10(1), 383-448.
35. McIntyre, M. J. (1999). Audit, education and Goodhart's law: Or, taking rigidity seriously. Retrieved October 11, 2006, from http://www.atm.damtp.cam.ac.uk/people/mem/papers/LHCE/ dilnot-analysis.html, 1999.
36. McKibbin, R. (2006). The destruction of the public sphere. London Review of Books, 28(1), 3-6.
37. O'Boyle, L. (1983). Learning for its own sake: The German university as a nineteenth-century model. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 25(1), 3-25.
38. Parker, M., & Jary, D. (1995). The McUniversity: Organization, management and academic subjectivity. Organization, 2, 319-338.
39. Power, M. (1999). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Prodi, R. (2000). Speech to the Second COMECE Congress, Brussels.
41. Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
42. Ritzer, G. (1993). The McDonaldization of society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
43. Russell, C. (1992). Academic freedom. London and New York: Routledge.
44. Sample, S. B. (2002). Address to the 23rd Army Science Conference, Orlando, Florida, December 2.
45. Scott, A. (2005). Governance: Multi-level or post-democratic? (Paper presented to the working group on Sub-national dilemmas in an age of multilevel governance, AMIDST, Amsterdam).
46. Supiot, A. (2005). Homo juridicus. Paris: Seuil.
47. Tomusk, V. (2006). Melancholy and power, knowledge and propaganda: Discussing the contribution of the Bologna process to higher education research. Retrieved October 11, 2006, from http://ugle.svf.uib.no/ svfweb1/filer/1303.pdf.
48. Zinoviev, A. (1999). Une guerre contre l'Europe, Le Monde, Paris, May 25.