The donor as patient: Assessment and support

Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 339-355

  Applegarth, Linda D ^a   Kingsberg, Sheryl A ^b  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35148850252     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511547263.021     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Cohen C B, ed. New Ways of Making Babies: The Case of Egg Donation. Commissioned by the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction (NABER). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press 1996; 94.
2. Donation of gametes. In: Jones HW Jr, J Cohen, eds. IFFS Surveillance '04 Fertil Steril 2004: 81:S27, Chapter 6.
3. Blyth E, Landau R. Third-Party Assisted Conception across Cultures: Social, Legal and Ethical Perspectives. New York: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2004.
4. Haase J, Takefman J. Global perspectives in infertility counseling. International Infertility Counseling Organization, Postgraduate Course. 18th World Congress, International Federation of Fertility Socieities. Montreal, Canada, May, 2004.
5. Directive 2004/23 E. C. of the European Parliament and the Council (2004) O. J. L102/48 (March 31, 2004).
6. The regulation of Donor-Assisted Conception, Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, United Kingdom, September, 2004.
7. Cox L W. The Role of Accreditation Committees in Oocyte Donation. Reprod Fertil Develop 1992; 4:731-737.
8. Steinbock B. Sperm as property. In: J Harris, S Holm, eds. The Future of Human Reproduction: Ethics, Choice, and Regulation. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, 1998; 160.
9. Letur-Konirsch H. Oocyte donation in France and national balance sheet (GEDO). Different European approaches. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2004; 32:108-115.
10. Anderson N, Gianaroli L, Felbergaum, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:1158-1176.
11. Boggio A. Italy enacts new law on medically assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:1153-1157.
12. Soderstrom-Antilla V, Hovatta O. Oocyte donation to be legalized in Sweden. Excellent results reported from other countries. Lakartidningen 2002; 99:3118-3121.
13. Practice Committee of the American Fertility Society. Guidelines for gamete donation: Fertil Steril 1993; 59:1S- 9S.
14. Baetens P. Oocyte donation. In: JBoivin, H Kentenich, eds. ESHRE Monographs: Guidelines on Infertility Counselling. London: Oxford University Press, 2002; 33-34.
15. ESHRE: Task Force on Ethics and Law. Gamete and embryo donation. Hum Reprod 2002; 17:1407-1408.
16. Pennings G. Reproductive tourism is on the increase in Europe. Presentation at the 21st Annual Conference of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. News-Medical. Net, June 20, 2005.
17. Lee F R. Driven by costs, fertility clients head overseas. New York Times, January 25, 2005.
18. Shettles L B. The respiration of human spermatozoa and their response to various gases and low temperature. Am J Physiology 1940; 128:408-415.
19. Rubin B. Psychological aspects of human artificial insemination. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1965; 13:121-132.
20. Sherman J K, Bunge R G. Observations on preservation of human spermatozoa. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine. 1953; 686-688.
21. Sherman J K. Banks for frozen semen: Current status and prospects. In: E Graham, ed. The Integrity of Frozen Sperm. Washington, DC: 1978; 78-91.
22. Daniels K R, Ericsson H L, Burn I P. Families and donor insemination: The views of semen donors. ScandJ Soc Welfare 1996; 5:229-237.
23. Miller D, Jeffries D J, Green J, Harris J R, Pinching A J. HTLV-III: Should testing ever be routine? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986; 292:941-943.
24. Schover L R, Rothmann S A, Collins R L. The personality and motivation of semen donors: A comparison with oocyte donors. Hum Reprod 1992; 7:575-579.
25. Lutjen P, Trouson A, Leeton J, Findlay J, Wood C, Renou P. The establishment and maintenance of pregnancy using in vitro fertilization and embryo donation in a patient with ovarian failure. Nature 1984; 207:174-176.
26. Sauer M V, Paulson R J, Lobo R A. Reversing the natural decline in human fertility. JAMA 1992; 268:1275-1279.
27. Sauer M V, Paulson R J. Human oocyte and pre-embryo donation: An evolving method for the treatment of infertility. AmJ Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163:1421-1424.
28. Leeton J, Harman J. The donation of oocytes to known recipients. AustNZJ Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 27:248-250.
29. Braverman A M. Oocyte donation: Psychological and counseling issues. Clin Consult Obstet Gynecol 1994; 6:143-149.
30. Raoul-Duval A, Letur-Konirsch H, Frydman R. Anonymous ooctye donation: A psychological study of recipients, donors, and children. Hum Reprod 1992; 7:51-54.
31. Klock S C, Maier D. Psychological factors related to donor insemination. Fertil Steril 1991; 56:489-495.
32. Novaes S B. Giving, receiving, repaying: Gamete donor and donor policies in reproductive medicine. Int J Tech- nol Assess Health Care 1989; 5:639-657.
33. Schover L R, Reis J, Collins R L, Blankstein J, Kanoti G, Quigley M M. The psychological evaluation of ovum donors. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 11:299-309.
34. Schover L R, Collins R L, Quigley M M, et al. Psychological follow-up of women evaluated as oocyte donors. Hum Reprod 1991; 6:1487-91.
35. Lessor R, Cervamtes M. P'Connor N, Balmaceda J, Asch RH. An analysis of social and psychological characteristics of women volunteering to become oocyte donors. Fertil Steril 1993; 59:65-71.
36. Kalfoglou A L, Gittelsohn J. A qualitative follow-up study of women's experiences with oocyte donation. Human Reprod 2000; 15:798-805.
37. Kingsberg S A, Applegarth L D, Janata J W. Embryo donation programs and policies in North America: Survey results and implications for health and mental health professionals. Fertil Steril 2000; 73:215-220.
38. Gurmankin A D. Extracting eggs: A study of recruitment in oocyte donation. AmJ Bioeth 2001; Fall; 1:W21.
39. Lindheim S R, Chase J, Sauer M V. Assessing the influence of payment on motivations of women participating as oocyte donors. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2001; 52:89-92.
40. Klock S C, Braverman A M, Rausch D T. Predicting anonymous egg donor satisfaction: A preliminary study. J Womens Health 1998: 7:229-237.
41. Sauer M. Further HFEA restrictions on egg donation in the UK: Two strikes and you're out! Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 10:431-433.
42. Shenfield F. Too late for change, too early to judge, but an oxymoron will not solve the problem. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 10:433-435.
43. Mahlstedt P P, Probasco K A. Sperm donors: Their attitudes toward providing medical and psychosocial information for recipient couples and donor offspring. Fertil Steril 1991; 56:747-753.
44. van den Akker OV. A review of family donor constructs: Current research and future directions. Hum Reprod Update, September, 2005.
45. Brill M, Levin S. Psychologic counseling and screening for egg donation. In: MM Seibel, SL Crockin, eds. Family Building Through Egg and Sperm Donation: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Issues. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 1996; 76-93.
46. Schover L R. Psychological aspects of oocyte donation. Infertil Reprod Med Clin North Am 1993; 4:483-502.
47. Bartlett J A. Psychiatric issues in nonanonymous ooctye donation. Psychosomatics 1991; 32:433-437.
48. Daniels K R, Curson R, Lewis G M. Families formed as a result of donor insemination: The views of semen donors. Child Fam Soc Work 1996; 1:97-106.
49. Daniels K R, Ericsson H L, Burn I P. Families and donor insemination: The views of semen donors. Scand J Soc Welfare 1996; 5:229-237.
50. Daniels K R, Curson R, Lewis G M. Semen donor recruitment: A study of donors in two clinics. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:746-751.
51. Kalfoglou A, Geller G. Navigating conflict of interest in oocyte donation: An analysis of donors' experiences. Women's Health Issues 2000; 10:226-239.
52. Gurmankin A D. Risk information provided to prospective oocyte donors in a preliminary phone call. Am J Bioeth2001; Fall; 1:3-13.
53. Dear J F. Regulating the fiction of informed consent in ART medicine. AmJ Bioeth 2001; 1:19-20.
54. Kalfogulou A L, Geller G. A follow-up study with oocyte donors exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation. Fertil Steril 2000; 74:660-667.
55. Jensen C, Zweifel J, Davidson M, et al. Comparative assessment of pre and post-donation attitudes with respect to potential oocyte and embryo disposition among ovum donors in an egg program. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: S304.
56. Klock S C, Stout J E, Davidson M. Psychological characteristics and factors related to willingness to donate again among anonymous oocyte donors. Fertil Steril 2003; 79:1312-1316.
57. Patrick M, Smith A L, Meyer W R, et al. Anonymous ooctye donation: A follow-up questionnaire. Fertil Steril 2001; 75:1034-1305.
58. Macaulay J, Berkowitz L, eds. Altruism and Helping Behavior: Social Psychological Studies ofSome Antecedents and Consequences. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
59. Simmons R G, Klein S D, Simmons R L. Gift of Life: The Social and Psychological Impact of Organ Transplantation. New York: Wiley, 1977.
60. Bateson C D. The Altruism Question. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum, 1991.
61. Fehr E, Fischbacher U. The nature of human altruism. Nature 2003; 425:785-791.
62. Schover L R. Psychological evaluation and counseling of gamete donors. In: Clinical Assessment and Counseling in Third-party Reproduction (XIII). Proceedings of Annual Postgraduate Course of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Montreal, Quebec, Canada; October, 1993.
63. Plomin R. Environment and genes: Determinants of behavior. Am Psychol 1989; 44:105-111.
64. Braverman AM. Survey results on the current practice of ooctye donation. Fertil Steril 1993; 59:1216-1220.
65. RESOLVE, the National Infertility Association: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Grant: EAA OP002099, 2002.
66. David A, Avidan D. Artificial insemination by donor: Clinical and psychological aspects. Fertil Steril 1976; 27:528-532.
67. Schenker J G. Sperm, oocyte, and pre-embryo donation. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995; 12:499-508.