Embedding digital infrastructure in epistemic culture

New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding E-Science

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 99-119

  Merz, Martina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35148842124     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-717-1.ch005     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (Eds.). (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
2. Bohlin, I. (2004). Communication regimes in competition: The current transition in scholarly communication seen through the lens of the sociology of technology. Social Studies of Science, 34(3), 365-391.
3. Cornell News (2002). Cornell professor Paul Ginsparg, science communication rebel, named a MacArthur Foundation Fellow. Retrieved March 2, 2005, from http://www.news.cornell.edu/releases/Sept02/Ginsparg-MacArthur.ws.html
4. Galison, P. L., & Stump, D. J. (Eds.). (1996). The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
5. Ginsparg, P. H. (1997). Electronic research archives for physics. In The impact of electronic publishing on the academic community. Portland Press. Retrieved March 2, 2005, from www.portlandpress.com/pp/books/online/tiepac/session1/ch7.htm
6. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14), 1306-1320.
8. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1994). Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science. In S. Jasanoff et al. (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 140-166). London: Sage.
9. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Krais, B. (2002). Academia as a profession and the hierarchy of the sexes: Paths out of research in German universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(4), 407-418.
11. Merz, M. (n.d.). Locating the dry lab on the lab map. In J. Lenhard, G. Küppers, & T. Shinn (Eds.), Simulation. Pragmatic constructions of reality. Sociology of the sciences-A yearbook (Forthcoming). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Merz, M. (1998). "Nobody can force you when you are across the ocean"- Face to face and e-mail exchanges between theoretical physicists. In C. Smith & J. Agar (Eds.), Making space for science: Territorial themes in the shaping of knowledge (pp. 313-329). London: Macmillan.
13. Merz, M. (1999). Multiplex and unfolding: Computer simulation in particle physics. Science in Context, 12(2), 293-316.
14. Merz, M., & Knorr-Cetina, K. (1997). Deconstruction in a "thinking" science: Theoretical physicists at work. Social Studies of Science, 27, 73-111.
15. Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: Complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111-134.
16. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physics. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.