Phenotypic diversity and delimitation between wild and cultivated forms of the genus Pyrus in North-eastern Spain based on morphometric analyses

Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

Volumn 54, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1473-1487

  Voltas, Jordi ^a   Pemán, Jesús ^a   Fusté, Francesca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LLEIDA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Discriminant analysis; Genetic variation; Germplasm collection; Morphological traits; Pyrus spp.; Ward MLM strategy

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTIVAR; DECIDUOUS TREE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIATION; GERMPLASM; HYBRID; INTROGRESSION; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRY; PHENOTYPE; WILD POPULATION;

EURASIA; EUROPE; IBERIAN PENINSULA; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

PYRUS; PYRUS COMMUNIS;

EID: 35148829924     PISSN: 09259864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-006-9136-y     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK (2001) The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol 16:613-622
2. Bartsch D, Sukopp H, Sukopp U (1993) Introduction of plants with special regard to cultigens running wild. In: Wöhrmann K, Tomiuk J (eds) Transgenic organisms. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 135-151
3. Bell RL, Quamme HA, Layne REC, Skirvin RM (1996) Pears. In: Janick J, Moore JN (eds) Fruit breeding, volume I: tree and tropical fruits. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 441-514
4. Bolòs O, Vigo J (1984) Flora dels Països Catalans. Ed. Barcino, Barcelona
5. Coart E, Vekemans X, Smulders MJM, Wagner I, Van Huylenbroeck J, Van Bockstaele E, Roldán-Ruiz I (2003) Genetic variation in the endangered wild apple (Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill.) in Belgium as revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphism and microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol 12:845-857
6. Crossa J, Franco J (2004) Statistical methods for classifying genotypes. Euphytica 137:19-37
7. Dillon WR, Goldstein M (1984) Multivariate analysis. Methods and applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York
8. Eriksson G (2001) Conservation of noble hardwoods in Europe. Can J For Res 31:577-587
9. Franco J, Crossa J, Villaseñor J, Taba S, Eberhart S (1998) Classifying genetic resources by categorical and continuous variables. Crop Sci 38:1688-1696
10. Franco J, Crossa J (2002) The modified location model for classifying genetic resources: I. Association between categorical and continuous variables. Crop Sci 42:1719-1726
11. Franco J, Crossa J, Taba S, Eberhart S (2002) The modified location model for classifying genetic resources: II. Unrestricted variance-covariance matrices. Crop Sci 42:1727-1736
12. Font X (2005). Mòdul Flora i Vegetació. Banc de Dades de Biodiversitat de Catalunya. Generalitat de Catalunya and Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona. Available on-line: http://biodiver.bio.ub.es/biocat/ homepage.html
13. Gower JC (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:857-874
14. Hanelt P, the Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (2001) Mansfeld's encyclopedia of agricultural and horticultural crops. Springer, Berlin
15. Iketani H, Manabe T, Matsuta N, Akihama T, Hayashi T (1998) Incongruence between RFLPs of chloroplast DNA and morphological classification in east Asian pear (Pyrus spp.). Genet Resour Crop Evol 43:607-617
16. Kaufman L, Rosseuw PJ (1990) Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York
17. Krzanowski WJ (1983) Distance between populations using mixed continuous and categorical variables. Biometrika 70:235-243
18. Linder CR, Taha I, Seiler GS, Snow AA, Rieseberg LH (1998) Long-term introgression of crop genes into wild sunflower populations. Theor Appl Genet 96:339-347
19. López-González G (2004) Los árboles y arbustos de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares. Ediciones Mundi-Prensa, Madrid
20. Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM (1979) Multivariate analysis. Academic Press, New York
21. Morettini A, Baldini E, Scaramuzzi F, Mittenpergher L (1967) Monografia delle Principali Cultivar di Pero. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Firenze
22. Muñoz-Garmendia F, Navarro C (1998) Flora Ibérica. Vol. VI. Rosaceae. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid
23. Perron M, Bousquet J (1997) Natural hybridization between black spruce and red spruce. Mol Ecol 6:725-734
24. SAS Institute (1999a) SAS/IML user's guide, version 8. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC
25. SAS Institute (1999b) SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC
26. Stephen BR, Wagner I, Kleinschmit J (2003) EUFORGEN technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use of wild apple and pear (Malus sylvestris and Pyrus pyraster). International Genetic Resources Institute, Rome
27. Terpó A (1984) Comprehensive survey of taxonomy of species Pyrus. Acta Hort 161:117-132
28. The Prospect Team (2004) Prospect: the wood database. Oxford Forestry Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford
29. Turok J, Eriksson G, Russel K, Borelli S (2002) EUFORGEN Noble Hardwoods Network. Report of the 4th meeting and the 5th meeting. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome
30. UPOV (2000) Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability. Pear (Pyrus communis L.). UPOV, Geneva
31. Vanden Broeck A, Villar M, Van Bockstaele E, Van Slycken J (2005) Natural hybridization between cultivated poplars and their wild relatives: evidence and consequences for native poplar populations. Ann For Sci 62:601-613
32. Wagner I (1995) Identifikation von Wildapfel (Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill.) und Wildbirne (Pyrus pyraster (L.) Burgsd.). Forstarchiv 66:39-47
33. Ward J (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58:236-244
34. Wolf H, Arenhövel W, Behm A, Franke A, Kleinschmit J, Rogge M, Schneck D, Schneck V, Schulzke R, Tabel U (2000) Conservation and breeding of wild fruit tree species in forestry. Acta Hort 538:57-61
35. Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Sawamura Y, Manabe T, Kotobuki K, Hayashi T, Ban Y, Matsuta N (2002) Simple sequence repeats for genetic analysis in pear. Euphytica 124:129-137