Erratum to "Policy diffusion in space and time: The case of charter schools in California school districts" [Regional Science and Urban Economics 37 (2007) 526-541] (DOI:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2007.02.001);Policy diffusion in space and time: The case of charter schools in California school districts

Regional Science and Urban Economics

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 526-541

  Rincke, Johannes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Charter schools; Policy diffusion; Policy innovation; Spatial correlation

Indexed keywords

DECENTRALIZATION; ECONOMETRICS; EDUCATION POLICY; EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 35148816047     PISSN: 01660462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2007.12.001     Document Type: Erratum

References (22)

1. Baicker K. The spillover effects of state spending. Journal of Public Economics 89 (2005) 529-544
2. Beron K.J., and Vijverberg W.P.M. Probit in a spatial context: A Monte Carlo analysis. In: Anselin L., Florax R.J., and Rey S.J. (Eds). Advances in Spatial Econometrics (2004), Springer, Berlin 169-195
3. Besley T., and Case A. Incumbent behavior: vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition. American Economic Review 85 (1995) 25-45
4. Bivand R., and Szymanski S. Spatial dependence through local yardstick competition: theory and testing. Economics Letters 55 (1997) 257-265
5. Blundell R., Griffith R., and Van Reenen J. Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Economic Journal 105 (1995) 333-344
6. Bordignon M., Cerniglia F., and Revelli F. In search of yardstick competition: a spatial analysis of Italian municipality property tax setting. Journal of Urban Economics 54 (2003) 199-217
7. Brett C., and Pinkse J. Those taxes are all over the map: a test for spatial dependence of municipal tax rates in British Columbia. International Regional Science Review 20 (1997) 131-151
8. Brueckner J.K. Testing for strategic interaction among local governments: the case of growth controls. Journal of Urban Economics 44 (1998) 438-467
9. Brueckner J.K. Strategic interaction among governments: an overview of empirical studies. International Regional Science Review 26 (2003) 175-188
10. Brueckner J.K., and Saavedra L.A. Do local governments engage in strategic property tax competition?. National Tax Journal 54 (2001) 203-229
11. Büttner T. Local business taxation and competition for capital: the choice of the tax rate. Regional Science and Urban Economics 31 (2001) 215-245
12. Case A. Neighborhood influence and technological change. Regional Science and Urban Economics 22 (1992) 491-508
13. Case A., Hines J.R., and Rosen H.S. Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: evidence from the States. Journal of Public Economics 52 (1993) 285-307
14. Dolowitz D., and Marsh D. Who learns what from whom? A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies 44 (1996) 343-357
15. Fredriksson P.G., and Millimet D.L. Strategic interaction and the determination of environmental policy across U.S. states. Journal of Urban Economics 51 (2002) 101-122
16. Hayashi M., and Boadway R. An empirical analysis of intergovernmental tax interaction: the case of business income taxes in Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics 34 (2000) 481-503
17. Kotsogiannis C., and Schwager R. On the incentives to experiment in federations. Journal of Urban Economics 60 (2006) 484-497
18. Montalvo J.G. GMM estimation of count-panel-data models with fixed effects and predetermined instruments. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 15 (1997) 82-89
19. Rincke J. Competition in the public school sector: evidence on strategic interaction among US school districts. Journal of Urban Economics 59 (2006) 352-369
20. Rincke J. Policy innovation in local jurisdictions: testing for neighborhood influence in school choice policies. Public Choice 129 (2006) 189-200
21. Stone D. Learning lessons and transferring policy across time, space and disciplines. Politics 19 (1999) 51-59
22. Wooldridge J.M. Multiplicative panel data models without the strict exogeneity assumption. Econometric Theory 13 (1997) 667-678