Effect of low-frequency gain and venting effects on the benefit derived from directionality and noise reduction in hearing aids

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 46, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 554-568

  Keidser, Gitte ^a   Carter, Lyndal ^a   Chalupper, Josef ^b   Dillon, Harvey ^a  

^a NATIONAL ACOUSTIC LABORATORIES   (Australia)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Amplification; Directional microphone; Field test; Horizontal localization; Low frequency gain; Noise reduction; Paired comparison; Speech recognition in noise; Venting effects

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MALE; MICROPHONE; NOISE REDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND TRANSMISSION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE;

EID: 35148812669     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020701481698     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Agnew, J. 1998. The causes and effects of distortion and internal noise in hearing aids. Trends Amplif, 3, 82-118.
2. Bench J. & Bamford J.M. (eds.) 1979. Speech Hearing Tests and the Spoken Language of Hearing-Impaired Children. London: Academic Press.
3. Byrne, D. & Noble, W. 1998. Optimizing sound localization with hearing aids. Trends Amplif, 3, 51-73.
4. Byrne, D., Noble, W. & LePage, B. 1992. Effects of long-term bilateral and unilateral fitting of different hearing-aid types on the ability to locate sounds. J Am Acad Audiol, 3, 369-382.
5. Chung, K. 2004a. Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies, and noise reduction algorithms. Trends Amplif, 8, 83-124.
6. Chung, K. 2004b. Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part II. Feedback and occlusion effect reduction strategies, laser shell manufacturing processes, and other signal processing technologies. Trends Amplif, 8, 125-164.
7. Courtois, J. 1988. Open molds. In J.H. Jensen (ed.), Hearing Aid Fitting: Theoretical and Practical Views. Copenhagen: Stougaard Jensen, pp. 173-202.
8. Cox, R.M. & Alexander, G.C. 1983. Acoustic versus electronic modifications of hearing aid low-frequency output. Ear Hear, 4, 190-196.
9. Dillon, H. 1991. Allowing for real ear venting effects when selecting the coupler gain of hearing aids. Ear Hear, 12, 406-416.
10. Dillon, H. 1999. NAL-NL1: A new procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids. Hear J, 52, 10-16.
11. Dillon H. (ed.)2001. Hearing Aids. Sydney: Boomerang Press, pp. 130-134, 385.
12. Dillon, H., Keidser, G., O'Brien, A. & Silberstein, H. 2003. Sound quality comparisons of advanced hearing aids. Hear J, 56, 30-40.
13. Fabry, D.A. 2006. Facts vs myths: the 'skinny' on slim-tube open fittings. Hear Rev, 13, 20-25.
14. Fabry, D.A., Leek, M.R., Walden, B.E. & Cord, M. 1993. Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce 'upward spread' of masking? J Rehabil Res Dev, 30, 318-25.
15. Flynn M. 2003. Opening ears: The scientific basis for an open ear acoustic system. Hear Rev, 10, 34-36,67.
16. Flynn M. 2004. Maintaining the directional advantage in open fittings. Hear Rev, 11, 32, 36.
17. Gabrielsson, A., Schenkman, B.N. & Hagerman, B. 1988. The effects of different frequency responses on sound quality judgments and speech intelligibility. J Speech Hear Res, 31, 166-177.
18. Good, M.D. & Gilkey, R.H. 1996. Sound localization in noise: The effect of signal-to-noise ratio. J Acoust Soc Am, 99, 1108-1117.
19. Grover, B.C. & Martin, M.C. 1979. Physical and subjective correlates of earmould occlusion. Audiology, 18, 335-350.
20. Hamacher, V., Chalupper, J., Eggers, J., Fischer, E., Kornagel, U., et al. 2005. Signal processing in high-end hearing aids: State of the art, challenges, and future trends. J Applied Sign Process, 18, 2915-2929.
21. Harford, E.R. & Fox, J. 1978. The use of high-pass amplification for broad-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology, 17, 10-26.
22. Kampe, S.D. & Wynne, M.K. 1996. The influence of venting on the occlusion effect. Hear J, 49, 59-66.
23. Keidser, G. 1995a. The relationship between listening conditions and alternative amplification schemes for multiple memory hearing aids. Ear Hear, 16, 575-586.
24. Keidser, G. 1995b. Long-term spectra of a range of real-life noisy environments. Austr J Audiol, 17, 39-46.
25. Keidser, G., Brew, C., Brewer, S., Dillon, H., Grant, F., et al. 2005. The preferred response slopes and two-channel compression ratios in twenty listening conditions by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners, and their relationship to the acoustic input. Int J Audiol, 44, 656-670.
26. Keidser, G., Dillon, H. & Byrne, D. 1995. Candidates for multiple frequency response characteristics. Ear Hear, 16, 562-574.
27. Keidser, G., Rohrseitz, K., Dillon, H., Hamacher, V., Carter, L., et al. 2006. The effect of multi-channel wide dynamic range compression, noise reduction, and directional microphone on horizontal localization performance in hearing-aid wearers. Int J Audiol, 45, 563-579.
28. Kiessling, J., Brenner, B., Jespersen, C.T., Groth, J. & Jensen, O.D. 2005. Occlusion effect of earmoulds with different venting systems. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 237-249.
29. Kiessling, J., Margolf-Hackl, S., Geller, S. & Olsen, S.Ø. 2003. Researchers report on a field test of a non-occluding hearing instrument. Hear J, 56, 36-41.
30. Killion, M.C. 1988. The 'hollow voice' occlusion effect. In J.H. Jensen (ed.), Hearing Aid Fitting: Theoretical and Practical Views. Copenhagen: Stougaard Jensen, pp. 231-242.
31. Kochkin, S. 2000. MarkeTrek V: 'Why my hearing aids are in the drawer': the consumers' perspective. Hear J, 53, 34-42.
32. Kuk, F.K. 1991. Perceptual consequence of vents in hearing aids. Br J Audiol, 25, 163-169.
33. Kuk, F.K., Keenan, D.M. & Nelson, J.A. 2002. Preserving directional benefits for new users wearing smaller hearing aids. Hear J, 55, 46-52.
34. Lee, L.W. & Geddes, E.R. 1998. Perception of microphone noise in hearing instruments. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 3364-3368.
35. Lundberg, G., Ovegård, A., Hagerman, B., Gabrielsson, A. & Bränström, U. 1992. Perceived sound quality in a hearing aid with vented and closed earmould equalized in frequency response. Scand Audiol, 21, 87-92.
36. MacKenzie, K., Browning, G.G. & McClymont, L.G. 1989. Relationship between earmould venting, comfort and feedback. Br J Audiol, 23, 335-337.
37. Macrae, J.H. & Dillon, H. 1996. An equivalent input noise level criterion for hearing aids. J Rehab Res Dev, 33, 355-362.
38. Middlebrooks, J.C. & Green, D.M. 1991. Sound localization by human listeners. Ann Rev Psychol, 42, 135-159.
39. Mueller, H.G., Bright, K.E. & Northern, J.L. 1996. Studies of the hearing-aid occlusion effect. Sem Hear, 17, 21-31.
40. Pumford, J.M., Seawald, R.C., Scollie, S. & Jenstad, L.M. 2000. Speech recognition with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear dual-microphone hearing instruments. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 23-35.
41. Punch, J.L., Montgomery, A.A., Schwartz, D.M., Walden, B.E., Prosek, R.A. & Howard, M.T. 1980. Multidimensional scaling of quality judgments of speech signals processed by hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 68, 458-66.
42. Revit, L. 1992. Two techniques for dealing with the occlusion effect. Hear Instr, 43, 16-18.
43. Ricketts, T. 2000. Directivity quantification in hearing aids: Fitting and measurement effects. Ear Hear, 21, 45-58.
44. Ricketts, T. 2001. Directional hearing aids. Trends Amplif, 5, 139-176.
45. Ricketts, T. 2006. Directional hearing aids: New designs and predictions applied to old concepts. Hear J, 59, 10-18.
46. Ricketts, T. & Henry, P. 2002. Low-frequency gain compensation in directional hearing aids. Am J Audiol, 11, 29-41.
47. Ricketts, T.A., Henry, P.P. & Hornsby, B.W.Y. 2005. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields. Ear Hear, 26, 473-486.
48. Ricketts, T., Lindley, G. & Henry, P. 2001. Impact of compression and hearing-aid style on directional hearing-aid benefit and performance. Ear Hear, 22, 348-361.
49. Siegel S. (ed.) 1956. Nonparametric Statistics For The Behavioural Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, pp. 229-239.
50. Van Buuren, R.A., Festen, J.M. & Plomp, R. 1995. Evaluation of a wide range of amplitude-frequency responses for the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res, 38, 211-221.
51. Van den Bogaert, T., Klasen, T.J., Moonen, M., Van Deun, L. & Wouters, J. 2006. Horizontal localization with bilateral hearing aids: without is better than with. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 515-526.
52. Westermann, S. 1987. The occlusion effect. Hear Instr, 38, 43.
53. Wimmer V.H. 1986. The occlusion effect from earmoulds. Hear Instr, 37, 19, 57-58.