Case-based relational learning of expressive phrasing in classical music

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3155, Issue , 2004, Pages 419-433

  Tobudic, Asmir ^a   Widmer, Gerhard ^a,b  

^a AUSTRIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE   (Austria)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Case based reasoning; Music; Relational case based learning

Indexed keywords

NEAREST NEIGHBOR SEARCH;

CARDINALITIES; CASE BASED LEARNING; CLASSICAL MUSICS; DISTANCE MEASURE; EXPRESSIVE MUSIC PERFORMANCE; MAXIMAL MATCHINGS; MUSIC; RELATIONAL LEARNING;

CASE BASED REASONING;

EID: 35048903178     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-28631-8_31     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bisson, G. (1992). Learning in FOL with a Similarity Measure. In Proceedings of the 10th AAAI, 1992.
2. Arcos, J.L. and López de Mántaras (2001). An Interactive CBR Approach for Generating Expressive Music. Journal of Applied Intelligence 14(1), 115-129.
3. De Raedt, L. (1992). Interactive Theory Revision: an Inductive Logic Programming Approach. Academic Press.
4. Dzeroski S., Schulze-Kremer, Heidtke K.R., Siems K., Wettschereck D., and Blockeel H. (1998). Diterpene structure elucidation from 13C NMR spectra with inductive logic programming. Applied Artificial Intelligence: Special Issue on First-Order Knowledge Discovery in Databases, 12(5):363-384, July August 1998.
5. Emde, D. and Wettschereck, D. (1996). Relational Instance-Base Learning. In Proceedings of the Thirteen International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML'96), pages 122-130. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.
6. López de Mántaras, R. and Arcos, J.L. (2002). AI and Music: From Composition to Expressive Performances. AI Magazine 23(3), 43-57.
7. Mehlhorn, K. (1984). Graph algorithms and NP-completeness, volume 2 of Data structures and algorithms, Springer Verlag.
8. Muggleton, S. H. and Feng C. (1990). Efficient Induction of Logic Programs. In Proceedings of the First Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory,Tokyo.
9. Ramon, J. and Bruynooghe, M (1998). A Framework for defining distances between first-order logic objects. In D. Page, (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming, volume 1446 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 271-280. Springer-Verlag.
10. Ramon, J. and Bruynooghe, M. (2000). A polynomial time computable metric between point sets. Report CW 301, Department of Computer Science, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
11. Rouveirol, C. (1992). Extensions of inversion of resolution applied to theory completion. In S. Muggleton, (ed.), Inductive Logic Programming. Academic Press, London.
12. Tobudic, A. and Widmer, G. (2003). Playing Mozart Phrase By Phrase. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR'03), Trondheim, Norway. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
13. Tobudic, A. and Widmer, G. (2003). Relational IBL in Music with a New Structural Similarity Measure. In Proceeding of 9th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP'03). Szeged, Hungary. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
14. Todd, N. McA. (1992). The Dynamics of Dynamics: A Model of Musical Expression. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91, 3540-3550.
15. Widmer, G. and Tobudic, A. (2003). Playing Mozart by Analogy: Learning Multi-Level Timing and Dynamics Strategies. Journal of New Musical Research, 32(3), 259-268.