User needs and e-government accessibility: the future impact of WCAG 2.0

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3196, Issue , 2004, Pages 289-304

  Anderson, Shane ^a   Bohman, Paul R ^b,c   Burmeister, Oliver K ^d   Sampson Wild, Gian ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^c CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group   (Australia)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Disability; Guidelines; W3C; Web

Indexed keywords

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); USER INTERFACES; WEBSITES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

ACCESSIBILITY; DISABILITY; GUIDELINES; W3C; WEB;

TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 35048898403     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30111-0_25     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Access Board (2001). Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, www.section508.gov, accessed February 28, 2004.
2. Buhler, C. (2001), Empowered participation of users with disabilities in universal design, Universal Access in the Information Society, Vol 1. No 2. Oct, 85-90.
3. Companion Card (2004) www.companioncard.org.au, accessed 1 March 2004.
4. Firstgov (2004) US government portal for all information within the US government, www.firstgov.gov, accessed 1 March 2004.
5. Gov (2004) Australian whole-of-government single point of access (portal), www.gov.au, accessed 28th February 2004.
6. IMS (2001) IMS Guidelines for Developing Accessible Learning Applications, Version 0.6 White Paper, IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc., 19 October.
7. IRS (2004) Internal Revenue Service, www.irs.gov, accessed 1 March 2004.
8. Kaye, H.S. (2000) Computer and Internet Use Among People with Disabilities, Disability Statistics Report (13), Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
9. MBDA (2004) Minority Business Development Agency, www.mbda.gov, accessed 1 March 2004.
10. Online Council (2000) Joint Media Statement, www.dcita.gov.au/Article/ 00_1-2_1-4_15092.00.html, accessed March 2004.
11. Pedlow, R., Mirabella, M, and Chow, C. (2001) Universal access in HCI: Towards an information society for all, Proceedings of HCI International 2001, Ed. C. Stephanidis, New Jersey, Aug, Vol 3, 714-718.
12. Powlik, J.J. and Karshmer, A.J. (2002) When accessibility meets usability, Universal Access in the Information Society, Vol 1, No 3, 217-222.
13. Sampson-Wild, G. and Burmeister, O. K. (2001) The Continuing EVolution Of Best Practice Principles In Designing For Web Accessibility, Proceedings of OZCHI2001 Usability and usefulness for knowledge economics, Nov, 122-127.
14. Smith, P.D. and Brien, A.O. 2000. Universal Design from Policy to Practice - The Western Australian Experience. Proceedings, Designing for the 21st Century II: An International Conference on Universal Design. http://www.adaptenv.org/21century/Proceedings.asp, accessed 28 February 2004.
15. Schneiderman, B. (2001) CUU: bridging the digital divide with universal usability, ACM Interactions, Vol 8(2), 11-15.
16. th February 2004.
17. WCAG (2004) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group, accessed 28 February 2004.
18. Williamson, K. and Stillman, L. (2000) Online services for people with disabilities in Australian public libraries, Final report for the @ccessAbility Program, DoCITA, Monash University: Melbourne, Sep.
19. W3C (1999) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, http://www.w3.org/ TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/, accessed 28 February 2004.
20. W3C (2004) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, http://www.w3.org/ WAI/GL/WCAG20/, W3C internal Working Draft, 14 February 2004, accessed 28 February 2004.