Specifying integrated refactoring with distributed graph transformations

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3062, Issue , 2004, Pages 220-235

  Bottoni, Paolo ^a   Presicce, Francesco Parisi ^a,b   Taentzer, Gabriele ^c  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; GRAPH THEORY;

DISTRIBUTED GRAPH TRANSFORMATION; INTERNAL STRUCTURE; REFACTORING TOOLS; REFACTORINGS; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; SYSTEM BEHAVIORS; TRANSFORMATION UNITS; UML DIAGRAMS;

FLOW GRAPHS;

EID: 35048897659     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-25959-6_16     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. A. W.Appel. Modern Compiler Implementation in Java. Cambridge University Press,1998.
2. K. Beckand M. Fowler. Planning Extreme Programming. Addison Wesley,2001.
3. R. Fantaand V. Rajlich. Reengineering object-oriented code. In Proceedings of ICSM1998, pages 238-246. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1998.
4. M. Fowler,K. Beck, J. Brant, W. Opdyke, and D. Roberts. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison Wesley,1999.
5. M. Goedicke,B. Enders, T. Meyer, and G. Taentzer. Towards integration of multiple perspectives by distributed graph transformation. In M. Nagl, A. Schürr, and M. Münch, editors, Proc. AGTIVE1999, pages 369-377, 2000.
6. M. Goedicke,T. Meyer, and G. Taentzer. Viewpoint-oriented software development by distributed graph transformation: Towards a basis for living with inconsistencies. In Proc.4th IEEE Int. Symp. on Requirements Engineering, pages 92-99, 1999.
7. M. Kochand F. Parisi Presicce. Describing policies with graph constraints and rules. In A. Corradini, H. Ehrig, H.-J. Kreowski, and G. Rozenberg, editors, Proc. ICGT02, pages 223-238, 2002.
8. H.-J. Kreowski,S. Kuske, and A. Schürr. Nested graph transformation units. Int. J. on SEKE,7(4):479-502, 1997.
9. T. Mens.Conditional graph rewriting as a domain-independent formalism for software evolution. In M. Nagl, A. Schuerr, and M. Muench, editors, Proc. AGTIVE1999, pages 127-143, 1999.
10. T. Mens,S. Demeyer, and D. Janssens. Formalising behaviour preserving program transformations. In A. Corradini, H. Ehrig, H.-J. Kreowski, and G. Rozenberg, editors, Proc. ICGT02, pages 286-301, 2002.
11. nd Workshop on Soft Computing Applied to Software Engineering. Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, University of Twende, The Netherlands, February 2001.
12. OMG. UMLspecification version1.4. http://www.omg.org/technology/ documents/formal/uml.htm, 2001.
13. W. F.Opdyke. Refactoring Object-Oriented Frameworks. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,1992.
14. D. B.Roberts. Practical Analysis for Refactoring. PhD thesis, University of Illinois,1999.
15. G. Sunyé,D. Pollet, Y. Le Traon, and J.-M. Jézéquel. Refactoring UML models. In M. Gogolla and C. Kobryn, editors, Proc. UML2001, pages 134-148, 2001.
16. G. Taentzer,I. Fischer, M. Koch, and V. Volle. Visual Design of Distributed Systems by Graph Transformation. In H. Ehrig, H.-J. Kreowski, U. Montanari, and G. Rozenberg, editors, Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation, Volume3: Concurrency, Parallelism, and Distribution, pages 269-340. World Scientific, 1999.
17. L. Tokudaand D. Batory. Evolving object-oriented designs with refactorings. Automated Software Engineering,8:89-120, 2001.