MHC class I epitope binding prediction trained on small data sets

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3239, Issue , 2004, Pages 217-225

  Lundegaard, Claus ^a   Nielsen, Morten ^a   Lamberth, Kasper ^b   Worning, Peder ^a   Sylvester Hvid, Christina ^b   Buus, Søren ^b   Brunak, Søren ^a   Lund, Ole ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPITOPES; FORECASTING; GENES; PEPTIDES; T-CELLS; VACCINES;

AUTOMATIC SCORING; BINDING PATTERN; BINDING PEPTIDE; EMPIRICAL KNOWLEDGE; PREDICTION METHODS; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; SMALL DATA SET; T-CELL EPITOPES;

BINS;

EID: 35048880696     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30220-9_18     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adams, H.P., and Koziol, J.A. 1995. Prediction of binding to MHC class I molecules. J Immunol Methods 185:181-190.
2. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W, and Lipman, D.J. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl. Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402
3. Altuvia, Y., Schueler, O., and Margalit, H. 1995. Ranking potential binding peptides to MHC molecules by a computational threading approach. J Mol Biol 149: 244-250.
4. Bhasin, M., Singh, H., and Raghava, G.P.S. 2003. MHCBN: A comprehensive database of MHC binding and non-binding peptides. Bioinformatics 19: 665-666.
5. Brusic, V., Rudy, G., and Harrison, L.C. 1994. Prediction of MHC binding peptides using artificial neural networks. In Complex systems: mechanism of adaptation, (ed. a.Y.X. Stonier RJ), pp. 253-260. IOS Press, Amsterdam.
6. Brusic, V., Rudy, G., and Harrison, L.C. 1998. MHCPEP, a database of MHC-binding peptides: update 1997. Nucleic Acid Res 26: 368-371.
7. Buus, S., Lauemøller, S.L., Worning, P., Kesmir, C, Frimurer, T., Corbet, S., Fomsgaard, A., Hilden, J., Holm, A., and Brunak, S. 2003. Sensitive quantitative predictions of peptideMHC binding by a 'Query by Committee' artificial neural network approach. Tissue Antigens 62: 378-384.
8. Christensen, J.K., Lamberth, K., Nielsen, M., Lundegaard, C., Worning, P., Lauemøller, S.L., Buus, S., Brunak, S., and Lund, O. 2003. Selecting Informative Data for Developing Peptide-MHC Binding Predictors Using a "Query By Committee" Approach. Neural Computation 15: 2931-2942.
9. Doytchinova, I.A., and Flower, D.R. 2001. Toward the Quantitative Prediction of T-Cell Epitopes: CoMFA and CoMSIA Studies of Peptides with Affinity for the Class I MHC Molecule HLA-A*0201. J. Med. Chem. 44: 3572-3581.
10. Gulukota, K., Sidney, J., Sette, A., and DeLisi, C. 1997. Two complementary methods for predicting peptides binding major histocompatibility complex molecules. Journal of Molecular Biology 267: 1258-1267.
11. Hebsgaard, S.M., Korning, P.G., Tolstrup, N., Engelbrecht, J., Rouze, P., and Brunak, S. 1996. Splice site prediction in Arabidopsis thaliana pre-mRNA by combining local and global sequence information. Nucleic Acid Res 24: 3439-3452.
12. Henikoff, S., and Henikoff, J.G. 1992. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 89: 10915-10919
13. Henikoff, S., and Henikoff, J.G. 1994. Position-based sequence weights. J Mol Biol 243: 574-578.
14. Kondo, A., Sidney, J., Southwood, S., del Guercio, M.F., Appella, E., Sakamoto, H., Grey, H.M., Celis, E., Chesnut, R.W., Kubo, R.T., et al. 1997. Two distinct HLA-A*0101-specific submotifs illustrate alternative peptide binding modes. Immunogenetics 45: 249-258.
15. Kubo, R.T., Sette, A., Grey, H.M., Appella, E., Sakaguchi, K., Zhu, N.Z., Arnott, D., Sherman, N., Shabanowitz, J., and Michel, H. 1994. Definition of specific peptide motifs for four major HLA-A alleles. J Immunol 152: 3913-3924.
16. Marshall, K.W., Wilson, K.J., Liang, J., Woods, A., Zaller, D., and Rothbard, J.B. 1995. Prediction of peptide affinity to HLA DRB1*0401. J Immunol 154: 5927-5933.
17. Nielsen, M., Lundegaard, C., Worning, P., Lauemøller, S.L., Lamberth, K., Buus, S., Brunak, S., and Lund, O. 2003. Reliable prediction of T-cell epitopes using neural networks with novel sequence representations. Protein Science 12: 1007-1017.
18. Nielsen, M, Lundegaard, C, Worning, P, Sylvester-Hvid, C, Lamberth, K, Buus, S, Brunak, S, and Lund, O. 2004. Improved prediction of MHC class I and II epitopes using a novel Gibbs sampling approach. Bioinformatics 20: 1388-97.
19. Parker, K.C., Bednarek, M.A., and Coligan, J.E. 1994. Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. J Immunol 152: 163-175.
20. Press, W.U., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., and Vetterling, W.T. 1989. Numerical Recipies in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2 ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Rammensee, H., Bachmann, J., Emmerich, N., Bachor, O.A., and Stevanovic, S. 1999. SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs. Immunogenetics 50: 213-219.
22. Rognan, D., Lauemøller, S.L., Holm, A., Buus, S., and Tschinke, V. 1999. Predicting binding affinities of protein ligands from three-dimensional models: application to peptide binding to class I major histocompatibility proteins. J Med Chem 42: 4650-4658.
23. Schneider, T.D., and Stephens, R.M. 1990. Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. Nucleic Acid Res 18: 6097-6100.
24. Schueler-Furman, O., Alluvia, Y., Sette, A., and Margalit, H. 2000. Structure-based prediction of binding peptides to MHC class I molecules: application to a broad range of MHC alleles. Protein Science 9: 1838-1846.
25. Sette, A., and Sidney, J. 1999. Nine major HLA class I supertypes account for the vast preponderance of HLA-A and -B polymorphism. Immunogenetics 50: 201-212.
26. Stryhn, A., Pedersen, L.O., Romme, T., Holm, C.B., Holm, A., and Buus, S. 1996. Peptide binding specificity of major histocompatibility complex class I resolved into an array of apparently independent subspecificities: quantitation by peptide libraries and improved prediction of binding. Eur J Immunol. 26: 1911-1918.
27. Sweet, J.A. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of a diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285-1293.
28. Sylvester-Hvid C, Nielsen M, Lamberth K, Roder G, Justesen S, Lundegaard C, Worning P, Thomadsen H, Lund O, Brunak S, Buus S. 2004. SARS CTL vaccine candidates; HLA supertype-, genome-wide scanning and biochemical validation. Tissue Antigens 63: 395-400.
29. Sylvester-Hvid, C., Kristensen, N., Blicher, T., Ferré, H., Lauemøller, S.L., Wolf, X.A., Lamberth, K., Nissen, M.H., Pedersen, L.Ø., and Buus, S. 2002. Establishment of a quantitative ELISA capable of determining peptide - MHC class I interaction. Tissue Antigens 59: 251-258.
30. Yewdell, J.W., and Bennink, J.R. 1999. Immunodominance in major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted T lymphocyte responses. Annual Review of Immunology 17: 51-88.
31. Yu, K., Petrovsky, N., Schonbach, C., Koh, J.Y., and Brusic, V. 2002. Methods for prediction of peptide binding to MHC molecules: a comparative study. Mol Med. 8: 137-148.