PLUTO: A test methodology for product families

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3014, Issue , 2004, Pages 181-197

  Bertolino, Antonia ^a   Gnesi, Stefania ^a  

^a ISTI CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

EARLY REQUIREMENTS; PRODUCT FAMILIES; TEST CASE; TEST METHODOLOGY; TEST PLANNING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 35048876689     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24667-1_14     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bertolino, A., Fantechi, A., Gnesi, S., Lami, G., Maccari, A. Use Case Description of Requirements for Product Lines, REPL'02, Essen, Germany, Avaya Labs Tech. Rep. ALR-2002-033, September 2002.
2. Bertolino, A., Gnesi, S., Use Case-based Testing of Product Lines, Proc. ESEC/FSE 2003, p. 355-358, ACM Press.
3. Café project homepage, at: http://www.extra.research.philips.com/euprojects/cafe/.
4. Clements, P.C., Northrop, L. Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, August 2001.
5. Cockburn, A. Writing Effective Use Cases. Addison Wesley, 2001.
6. Component+, "D4 - BIT Case studies", www.componentplus.org, October 2002
7. van Gurp, J., Bosch, J., and Svahnberg, M. On the Notion of Variability in Software Product Lines, Proc. of the Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2001), p. 45-54.
8. Halmans, G., Pohl K., Communicating the Variability of a Software-Product Family to Customers, Journal of Software and Systems Modeling, Vol. 2, p.15-36 Springer, March 2003.
9. Jaring, M., and Bosch, J. Representing Variability in Software Product Lines: A Case Study. In Chastek G. J. (Ed.): Proc. Software Product Lines, 2nd Int. Conf, SPLC 2, San Diego, CA, USA. August 19-22, 2002, LNCS 2379, p.15-36.
10. Jazayeri, M., Ran, A., van der Linden, F. Software Architecture for Product Families: Principles and Practice, Publishers: Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. and London, 1998.
11. John, I., Muthig, D. Tailoring Use Cases for Product Line Modeling, International workshop on requirements Engineering for Product Line (REPL'02), 2, Avaya Labs Technical Report ALR-2002-033, September 2002.
12. Kamsties, E., Pohl, K., Reis, S., and Reuys, A., "Testing Variabilities in Use Case Model", 5th International Workshop on Product Family Engineering, Siena, November 2003.
13. Kauppinen, R., Taina J., RITA Environment for Testing Framework-based Software Product Lines. Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Programming Languages and Software Tools (SPLST'2003), Kuopio, Finland, June 2003, 58-69, University of Kuopio, 2003.
14. van der Linden, F. Software Product Families in Europe: The ESAPS & Café Projects, IEEE Software July/August 2002.
15. MacGregor, J. D. Testing a Software Product Line, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-2001-TR-022.
16. von der Massen, S., Lichter H. Modeling Variability by UML Use Case Diagram, International workshop on requirements Engineering for Product Line (REPL'02), Avaya Labs Technical Report ALR-2002-033, September 2002
17. Muccini H., van der Hoek A., Towards Testing Product Line Architectures, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 82 No. 6, 2003.
18. Nebut C., Pickin S., Le Traon Y. and Jézéquel, J-M. Reusable Test Requirements for UML-Modeled Product line, REPL'02, Essen, Germany, Avaya Labs Technical Report ALR-2002-033, September 2002.
19. Ostrand, T.J., and Balcer, M.J. The Category Partition Method For Specifying and Generating Functional Tests. ACM Comm. 31 (6), June 1988, pp. 676-686.
20. Schmid K., Verlage, M. The Economic Impact of Product Line Adoption and Evolution. IEEE Software, 19(4): 50-57, July-August 2002.