Methodology for semantic representing of product data in XML

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3309, Issue , 2004, Pages 380-387

  Fu, Xiangjun ^a   Li, Shanping ^a   Guo, Ming ^b   Channa, Nizamuddin ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY CITY COLLEGE   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; DATA DESCRIPTION; DATA MINING; ONTOLOGY; XML;

DESCRIPTION LOGIC; EXPRESSION MECHANISM; FORMAL SEMANTICS; INTEROPERATIONS; MODELING ABILITIES; ONTOLOGY-BASED METHODS; PRODUCT DATA MODEL; SEMANTIC KNOWLEDGE;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 35048874392     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30483-8_46     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. like Pratt, "Introduction to ISO 10303 - The STEP Standard for Product Data Exchange", SME Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, November, 2000.
2. chenk, D.A., and Wilson, P.R., "Information Modeling: The EXPRESS Way", Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1994 (ISBN 0-19-508714-3).
3. Felix Metzger, "The challenge of capturing the semantics of STEP data models precisely", Vorkshop on Product Knowledge Sharing for Integrated Enterprises (ProKSI'96), 1996.
4. Matthew West, "Integration and sharing of industrial data", European PDT Days, 1997, pp. 45-154.
5. adustrial automation systems and integration - Product data representation and exchange 'art 21: Clear text encoding of the exchange structure. ISO 10303-21, 1994. idustrial automation systems and integration -Product data representation and exchange part 28: Implementation methods: XML representations of EXPRESS schemas and data, ISO 10303-28,1998.
6. idustrial automation systems and integration -Product data representation and exchange part 25: Implementation methods: EXPRESS to XMI Binding. ISO 10303-25, 2002. V. Eliot Kimber, "XML Representation Methods for EXPRESS-Driven Data", National nstitute of Standards and Technology, GCR 99-781, Novemeber 1999.
7. object Management Group, "OMG Unified Modeling Language Specification, Version 4", September 2001.
8. ettke P.; Loos, P., "Ontological evaluation of reference models using the Bunge-WandVeber-model", In: Proceedings of the Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems 003. Tampa, FL, USA 2003, pp. 2944-2955.
9. Bunge, "Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Volumes Ontology: The Furniture of the World", Reidel, Boston, 1977.
10. Parsons, J. and Wand, Y., "Choosing Classes in Conceptual Modeling", Communications of the ACM, 1997,40(6), pp. 63-69.
11. T.R. Gruber, "A translation approach to portable ontology specifications", Knowledge Acquisition, 1998, 5(2), pp. 21-66.
12. Volker Haarslev, Carsten Lutz, Ralf Möller, "A Description Logic with Concrete Domains and a Role-froming Predicate Operator", Journal of Logic and Computation, 1999, 9(3).
13. Ian Horrocks, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, "Reducing OWL Entailment to Description Logic Satisfiability". International Semantic Web Conference 2003, pp. 17-29.
14. Klein, M., Fensel, D., van Harmelen, F., and Horrocks, I., "The Relation between Ontologies and XML Schemas", Linköping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science, 2001, 6(4).
15. M. Erdmann, R. Studer, "How to Sructure and Acess XML Documents With Ontologies", Data & Knowledge Engineering, 2001, 36(3), pp. 317-335.