A decade of longitudinal research on academic acceleration through the study of mathematically precocious youth

Roeper Review

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 141-144

  Swiatek, Mary Ann ^a,b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LAFAYETTE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35048871512     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190209554162     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Benbow, C. P. (1991). Meeting the needs of gifted students through use of acceleration. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of special education (Vol. 4, pp. 23-36). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
2. Benbow, C. P. (Ed.). (1992). Challenging the gifted: Grouping and acceleration [SpecialIssue]. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36 (2).
3. Benbow, C. P., & Arjmand, O. (1990). Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematics and science by mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82,430-441.
4. Benbow, C. P., Perkins, S., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Mathematics taught at a fast pace: A longitudinal evaluation of SMPY’s first class. In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp. 51-78). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
5. Brody, L. E., & Benbow, C. P. (1987). Accelerative strategies: How effective are they for the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 31,105-110.
6. Compton, M. F. (1982). The gifted underachiever in middle school. Roeper Review, 4,23-25.
7. Copley, J. O. (1961). The American high school and the talented student. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
8. Dweck, C., & Elliot, E. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of children psychology (Vol. 4, 4th ed., pp. 643-691). New York: Wiley.
9. Feldhusen, J. F. (1989). Synthesis of research on gifted youth. Educational Leadership, 46,6-11.
10. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7,117-140.
11. Gold, M. J. (1982). Education of the giftedltalented. Ventura, CA: Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Office.
12. Hildreth, G. H. (1966). Introduction to the gifted. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Jung, C. G. (1954). The gifted child. In H. Read, M. Fordham, & G. Adler (Eds.), The collected works of C. G.Jung (Vol. 17: The development of personality, pp. 133-148). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Kolitch, E. R., & Brody, L. E. (1992). Mathematics acceleration of highly talented students: An evaluation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36,78-86.
15. Kulik, J. A., & Kuliic, C. C. (1991). Ability grouping and gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 178-196). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 73-77.
17. Locke, E. A., Shaw, R. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152.
18. Miller, G. D. (1980). Who is gifted: A quick grasp on concepts is one clue. Independent School, 39,12-16.
19. O’Boyle, M. W., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Enhanced right hemisphere involvement during cognitive processing may relate to intellectual precocity. Neuropsychologia, 28,211-216.
20. Paulus, P. (1984). Acceleration: More than grade skipping. Roeper Review, 7,98-100.
21. Richardson, T. M., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Long-term effects of acceleration on die social-emotional adjustment of mathematically precocious youths. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82,464-470.
22. Schneider, B. H., Clegg, M. R., Byme, B. M., Ledingham, J. E., & Crombie, G. (1989). Social relations of gifted children as a function of age and school program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81,48-56.
23. Smith, E. (1984). Giftedness on demand in every classroom. Gifted Education International, 2,142-144.
24. Swiatek, M. A., & Benbow, C. P. (1991a). A ten-year longitudinal follow-up of participants in a fast-paced mathematics course. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 138-150.
25. Swiatek, M. A., & Benbow, C. P. (1991b). Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83,528-538.
26. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1989). Appropriate curriculum for gifted learners. Educational Leadership, 46, 13-15.
27. Whitmore, J. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
28. Zilli, M. G. (1971). Reasons why the gifted adolescent underachieves and some of the implications of guidance and counseling to this problem. Gifted Child Quarterly, 15,279-292