Different aspects of product family adoption

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3014, Issue , 2004, Pages 429-434

  Mohagheghi, Parastoo ^a,b,c   Conradi, Reidar ^b,c  

^a Ericsson Norway Grimstad   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c SIMULA RESEARCH LABORATORY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

CORE ASSET; PROCESS MODELING; PRODUCT FAMILIES; REQUIREMENT MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT APPROACH; SOFTWARE PROCESS; SOFTWARE PROCESS MODELING; SUPPORT REUSE;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 35048869632     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24667-1_32     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Atkinson, C, Bayer, J., Bunse, C., Kamsties, E., Laitenberger, O., Laqua, R., Muthig, D., Paech, B., Wilst, J., Zettel, J.: Component-based Product Line Engineering with UML. Addison-Wesley (2002).
2. Bosch, J.: Design and Use of Software Architecture: Adpoting and Evolving a Product-Line Approach. Addison-Wesley (2000).
3. Bosch, J.: Maturity and Evolution in Software Product Lines: Approaches, Artifacts and Organization. In Proc. of the Second Software Product Line Conference- SPLC2 (2002). Available at http://www.cs.rug.nl/∼bosch/.
4. INCO project: http://www.ifi.uio.no/∼isu/INCO/.
5. Jacobson, I., Griss, M., Jonsson, P.: Software Reuse: Architecture, Process and Organization for Business Success. ACM Press (1997).
6. Johnson, R.E., Foote, B.: Designing Reusable Classes. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, 1(3): 26-49 (1998).
7. Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Novak, W., Peterson, A.: Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study. Software Engineering Institute Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21. ADA 235785 (1990).
8. Karlsson, E.A. (Ed.): Software Reuse, a Holistic Approach. John Wiley & Sons (1995).
9. Krueger, C.: Eliminating the Adoption Barrier. IEEE Software. 19(4): 29-31 (2002).
10. McGregor, J.D., Northrop, L.M., Jarred, S., Pohl, K.: Initiating Software Product Lines. IEEE Software, 19(4): 24-27 (2002).
11. nd Workshop in Workshop Series on Empirical Software Engineering (WSESE'03), Rome-Italy (2003).
12. Naalsund, E., Walseth, O.A.: Decision Making in Component-Based Development. NTNU diploma thesis, 92 p. (2002) www.idi.ntnu.no/grupper/su/su-diploma-2002/naalsund_-_CBD_(GSN_Public_Version). pdf.
13. Northrop, L.M.: SEI's Software Product Line Tenets. IEEE Software, 19(4):32-40 (2002).
14. Parnas, D.L.: On the Design and Development of Program Families. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., SE-2(1):1-9 (1976).
15. Rational Unified Process, www.rational.com.
16. Schwarz, H., Killi, O.M., Skånhaug, S.R.: Study of Industrial Component-Based Development. NTNU pre-diploma thesis, 105 p. (2002) http://www.idi.ntnu.no/grupper/su/sif8094-reports/2002/p2.pdf.