Toward balancing conciseness, readability and salience: An integrated architecture

Proceedings of the International Natural Language Generation Conference, INLG 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages

  Eddy, Bruce ^a  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

CONTEXT-SENSITIVE; INTEGRATED APPROACH; INTEGRATED ARCHITECTURE; PIPELINE ARCHITECTURE; SCORING SYSTEMS;

INTEGRATED CONTROL;

EID: 35048864701     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Srinivas Bangalore, Owen Rambow, and Steve Whittaker. 2000. Evaluation metrics for generation. In Proceedings of International Natural Language Generation Conference, Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, June.
2. Hua Cheng and Chris Mellish. 2000. Capturing the interaction between aggregation and text planning in two generation systems. In Proceedings of International Natural Language Generation Conference, Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, June.
3. Laurence Danlos. 1987. The Linguistic Basis of Text Generation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
4. Bruce Eddy, Diana Bental, and Alison Cawsey. 2001. An algorithm for efficiently generating summary paragraphs using tree-adjoining grammar. In Proceedings of the 8th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 39–46, Toulouse, France, July.
5. Aravind K. Joshi. 1985. How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions: Tree Adjoining Grammars. In D. Dowty, L. Karttunen, and A. Zwicky, editors, Natural Language Processing: Psycholinguistic, Computational and Theoretical Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. Aravind K. Joshi. 1986. The relevance of tree adjoining grammar to generation. In Natural Language Generation: New results in Artificial Intelligence, Psychology and Linguistics - NATO Advanced Research Workshop, pages 233–252, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
7. Kathleen R. McKeown, Desmond A. Jordan, and Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou. 1998. Generating patient specific summaries of online literature. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Intelligent Text Summarisation, pages 34–43.
8. Ehud Reiter and Robert Dale. 2000. Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge University Press.
9. Ehud Reiter. 2000. Pipelines and size constraints. Computational Linguistics, (26):251–259.
10. Jacques Robin and Kathleen R. McKeown. 1996. Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation. Artificial Intelligence, 85(1-2), August.
11. Mathew Stone and Christine Doran. 1997. Sentence planning as description using tree-adjoining grammar. In Proceedings od the Assosciation for Computational Linguistics, pages 198–205.
12. K. Vijay-Shanker and Aravind K. Joshi. 1991. Unification based tree adjoining grammars. In J. Wedekind, editor, Unification-based Grammars. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
13. Bonnie Webber, Aravind K. Joshi, Alistair Knott, and Matthew Stone. 1999. What are little texts made of? a structural presuppositional account using lexicalised tag. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Levels of Representation in Discourse, Edinburgh, July. LOIRD’99.
14. Michael Zock. 1987. Proposal for simulating on-line generation by giving priority either to lexical choices or syntactic structure. In COGNITIVA.