Hybridizing evolutionary testing witn the chaining approach

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3103, Issue , 2004, Pages 1363-1374

  McMinn, Phil ^a   Holcombe, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERS;

DATA DEPENDENCIES; EVOLUTIONARY TESTING; FITNESS FUNCTIONS; HYBRID APPROACH; SIMPLE METHOD; TARGET STRUCTURE; TEST DATA; TEST OBJECT;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 35048856425     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24855-2_157     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. P. McMinn. Search-based software testing: A survey. Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, To appear, 2004/5.
2. L. Bottaci. Instrumenting programs with flag variables for test data search by genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2002), pages 1337 - 1342, New York, USA, 2002. Morgan Kaufmann.
3. M. Harman, L. Hu, R. Hierons, A. Baresel, and H. Sthamer. Improving evolutionary testing by flag removal. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2002), pages 1359-1366, New York, USA, 2002. Morgan Kaufmann.
4. A. Baresel and H. Sthamer. Evolutionary testing of flag conditions. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2003), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2724, pages 2442 - 2454, Chicago, USA, 2003. Springer-Verlag.
5. R. Ferguson and B. Korel. The chaining approach for software test data generation. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 5(1):63-86, 1996.
6. B. Korel. Automated test generation for programs with procedures. In International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA 1996), pages 209-215, San Diego, California, USA, 1996.
7. J. Wegener, A. Baresel, and H. Sthamer. Evolutionary test environment for automatic structural testing. Information and Software Technology, 43(14):841-854, 2001.
8. A. Baresel, H. Sthamer, and M. Schmidt. Fitness function design to improve evolutionary structural testing. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2002), pages 1329-1336, New York, USA, 2002. Morgan Kaufmann.
9. N. Tracey, J. Clark, and K. Mander. The way forward for unifying dynamic testcase generation: The optimisation-based approach. In International Workshop on Dependable Computing and Its Applications, pages 169-180, 1998.
10. A. Baresel, H. Pohlheim, and S. Sadeghipour. Structural and functional sequence test of dynamic and state-based software with evolutionary algorithms. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2003), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2724; pages 2428 - 2441, Chicago, USA, 2003. Springer-Verlag.