Marking: A privacy protecting approach against blackmailing

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1992, Issue , 2001, Pages 137-152

  Kügler, Dennis ^a   Vogt, Holger ^a  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM COMPOUNDS;

DIGITAL EQUIVALENTS; ELECTRONIC PAYMENT SYSTEMS; PAYMENT SYSTEMS; PRIVACY PROTECTING; REVOCATION MECHANISM; TRACING METHOD;

PUBLIC KEY CRYPTOGRAPHY;

EID: 35048849065     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44586-2_10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. H. Abelson, R. Anderson, S. Bellovin, J. Benaloh, M. Blaze, W. Diffie, J. Gilmore, P. Neumann, R. Rivest, J. Schiller, and B. Schneier. The risks of key recovery, key escrow, and trusted third-party encryption. Online available at http://www.cdt.org/crypto/risks98, 1998. An earlier version appeared in World Wide Web Journal, v.2, n.3, 1997, pages 241–257.
2. D. Chaum. Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO ’82, pages 199–203. Plenum, 1983.
3. D. Chaum. Zero-knowledge undeniable signatures. In Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT ’90, volume 473 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 458–464. Springer-Verlag, 1990.
4. J. Camenisch, U. Maurer, and M. Stadler. Digital payment systems with passive anonymity-revoking trustees. In Computer Security - ESORICS ’96, volume 1146 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 31–43. Springer-Verlag, 1996.
5. D. Chaum and H. van Antwerpen. Undeniable signatures. In Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO ’89, volume 435 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 212–216. Springer-Verlag, 1989.
6. G. Davida, Y. Frankel, Y. Tsiounis, and M. Young. Anonymity control in ecash systems. In Financial Cryptography ’97, volume 1318 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1–16. Springer-Verlag, 1997.
7. A.M. Froomkin. Flood control on the information ocean: Living with anonymity, digital cash, and distributed databases. 15 U. Pittsburgh Journal of Law & Commerce 395, 1996. Online available at http://www.law.miami.edu/˜froomkin/articles/ocean.htm.
8. U. Feige and A. Shamir. Witness indistinguishable and witness hiding protocols. In 22nd Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC ’90), pages 416–426. ACM Press, 1990.
9. Y. Frankel, Y. Tsiounis, and M. Young. “Indirect discourse proofs”: Achieving efficient fair off-line e-cash. In Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT ’96, volume 1163 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 286–300. Springer-Verlag, 1996.
10. R. Gennaro, H. Krawczyk, and T. Rabin. RSA-based undeniable signatures. In Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO ’97, volume 1294 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 132–149. Springer-Verlag, 1997.
11. M. Jakobsson, K. Sako, and R. Impagliazzo. Designated verifier proofs and their applications. In Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT ’96, volume 1070 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 143–154. Springer-Verlag,1996.
12. M. Jakobsson and M. Yung. Revokable and versatile electronic money. In 3rd ACM Conference on Computer Communication Security (CCCS ’96), pages 76–87. ACM Press, 1996.
13. M. Jakobsson and M. Yung. Distributed “magic ink” signatures. In Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT ’97, volume 1233 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 450–464. Springer-Verlag, 1997.
14. T. Okamoto. Provably secure and practical identification schemes and corresponding signature schemes. In Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO ’92, volume 740 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 31–53. Springer-Verlag, 1992.
15. D. Pointcheval and J. Stern. Provably secure blind signature schemes. In Advances in Cryptology - ASIACRYPT ’96, volume 1163 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 252–265. Springer-Verlag, 1996.
16. B. von Solms and D. Naccache. On blind signatures and perfect crimes. Computers and Security, 11(6):581–583, 1992.