Improving the testbed development process in collaboratories

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3127, Issue , 2004, Pages 261-274

  De Moor, Aldo ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAPH THEORY;

COLLABORATORIES; CONCEPTUAL GRAPH; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; DISTRIBUTED WORK; ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; WORK PRACTICES;

TESTBEDS;

EID: 35048843896     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-27769-9_17     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. E. Auramaki and K. Lyytinen. On the success of speech acts and negotiating commitments. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Communication Modelling, the Language/Action Perspective (LAP'96), Oistenvijk, The Netherlands, July 1-2, 1996, pages 1-12, 1996.
2. M. Bieber et al. Towards knowledge-sharing and learning in virtual professional communities. In Proc. of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, January 5-7, 2002.
3. J. Conklin, A. Selvin, S. Buckingham Shum, and M. Sierhuis. Facilitated hypertext for collective sensemaking: 15 years on from gIBIS. In Proc. of the 8th International Working Conference on the Language/Action Perspective on Communication Modelling, Tilburg, the Netherlands, July 1-2, 2003.
4. D. Corbett. Reasoning and Unification over Conceptual Graphs, Kluwer Academic, New York, 2003.
5. A. de Moor. Making Doug's dream come true: Collaboratories in context. In Proc. of the PORT Pragmatic Web Workshop, Borovets, Bulgaria, July 15, 2002.
6. A. de Moor, M. Keeler, and G. Richmond. Towards a pragmatic web. In Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, (ICCS 2002), Borovets, Bulgaria, July 15-19, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, 2002.
7. H. Delugach. Towards building active knowledge systems with conceptual graphs. In Proc. of the 11th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2003), Dresden, July 2003, pages 296-308, 2003.
8. D. Engelbart. Coordinated information services for a discipline- or mission-oriented community. In Proc. of the 2nd Annual Computer Communications Conference, San Jose, California, January 24, 1973.
9. D. Engelbart. Toward high-performance organizations: A strategic role for groupware. Technical report, Bootstrap Institute, 1992.
10. T.A. Finholt. Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(1):5-25, 2003.
11. G. Fitzpatrick and J. Welsh. Process support: Inflexible imposition or chaotic composition? Interacting with Computers, 7(2): 167-180, 1995.
12. J. Gillies and R. Cailliau. How the Web Was Born. Oxford University Press, 2000.
13. M. Keeler. Collaboratories: Improving theory and method. In Workshop on Innovations in Digital Asset Management, Fraunhofer / IPSI, Darmstadt, Germany, October 6-8, 2003.
14. R. Kling, G. McKim, J. Fortuna, and A. King. Scientific Collaboratories as socio-technical interaction networks: A theoretical approach. In Proceedings of AMCIS 2000, August 10-13, Long Beach, CA, 2000.
15. R.T. Kouzes, J.D. Myers, and W. Wulf. Collaboratories: Doing science on the Internet. IEEE Computer, 29(8):40-46, 1996.
16. C.F. Kurtz and D.J. Snowden. The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3):462-483, 2003.
17. J. Lederberg and K. Uncapher. Towards a national collaboratory: Report of an invitational workshop at the Rockefeller University, New York City, march 17-18. Technical report, National Science Foundation, 1989.
18. I. Nonaka, R. Toyama, and N. Konno. SECI, ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33:5-34, 2000.
19. NRC. National Collaboratories: Applying information technology for scientific research. Technical report, National Research Council, Committee Toward a National Collaboratory: Establishing the User-Developer Partnership, Washington, D.C., 1993.
20. T. Renkema and E. Berghout. Methodologies for information system investment evaluation at the proposal stage: A comparative view. Information and Software Technology, 39(1):1-13, 1997.
21. D. Sanderson. Collaborative and cooperative mediated research. In T.M. Harrison and T. Stephen, editors, Computer Networking and Scholarly Communication in the Twenty-First Century University, pages 95-114. State University of New York Press, 1996.
22. D. Schuler. A pattern language for living communication. In Participatory Design Conference (PDC'02), Malmo, Sweden, June, 2002.
23. S.B. Shum and A.M. Selvin. Structuring discourse for collective interpretation. In Proc. of Distributed Collective Practices 2000: Conference on Collective Cognition and Memory Practices, Paris, September 19-20, 2000.
24. J. Thomas, C. Danis, and S. Greene. Socio-technical pattern language proposal. In Pattern Language Workshop, 2002.
25. B. Wellman. Computer networks as social networks. Science, 293:2031-2034, 2001.
26. T. Winograd. A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work, report no.CSLI-87-98. Technical report, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, May 1987.
27. W.A. Woods. Understanding subsumption and taxonomy: A framework for progress. In J.F. Sowa, editor, Principles of Semantic Networks: Explorations in the Representation of Knowledge, pages 45-95. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1991.