Spatial associative classification at different levels of granularity: A probabilistic approach

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3202, Issue , 2004, Pages 99-111

  Ceci, Michelangelo ^a   Appice, Annalisa ^a   Malerba, Donato ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTERS;

ASSOCIATIVE CLASSIFICATION; ASSOCIATIVE CLASSIFIERS; DIFFERENT GRANULARITIES; DOMAIN-SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE; GRANULARITY LEVELS; PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES; QUALITATIVE SPATIAL REASONING; SPATIAL ASSOCIATION RULES;

DATA MINING;

EID: 35048836319     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30116-5_12     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N.: Exploration of heterogeneous spatial data using interactive geo-visualization tools: study of deprivation indices in North-West England. North-West England Report. 1ST European project SPIN!(Spatial Mining for Data of Public Interest).
2. Appice, A., Ceci, M., Lanza, A., Lisi, F.A. Malerba, D.: Discovery of Spatial Association Rules in Georeferenced Census Data: A Relational Mining Approach, Intelligent Data Analysis. Special issue of Mining Official Data. 7(6) (2003).
3. Baralis, E., Garza, P.; Majority Classification by Means of Association Rules., Knowledge Discovery in Databases PKDD'03, LNCS 2838, Springer-Verlag (2003), 35-46.
4. Clark, P., Matwin, S.: Using qualitative models to guide induction learning. Proceedings of International Conference of Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann, (1993), 49-56.
5. Domingos, P. Pazzani, M.: On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zeoones loss. Machine Learning, 29 (2-3), (1997), 103-130.
6. Dong, G., Zhang, X., Wong, L. Li, J.: Classification by aggregating emerging patterns. Proceedings of DS'99 (LNCS 1721), Japan, (1999).
7. Dzeroski, S., Lavrac, N. (eds.): Relational Data Mining. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (2001).
8. Egenhofer, M.J.: Reasoning about Binary Topological Relations. Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Large Spatial Databases, Zurich, Switzerland, (1991) 143-160.
9. Egenhofer, M.J., Franzosa, R.: Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5(2), (1991), 61-174.
10. Ester, M. Kriegel, H.P., Sander J.: Spatial Data Mining: A Database Approach. Proceedings International Symposium on Large Databases, Berlin, (1997), 47-66.
11. Fürnkranz, J., Flach, P.A.: An analysis of rule evaluation metrics. Proceedings of International Conference of Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann, (2003).
12. Güting, R.H.: An introduction to spatial database systems. VLDB Journal, 4(3) (1994)
13. Klösgen, W., May, M.: Spatial Subgroup Mining. Proceedings of European Syposium of Principles of Knowledge Discovery in Database PKDD'02. Springer-Verlag, (2002).
14. Koperski, K., Han, J.: Discovery of Spatial Association Rules in Geographic Information Databases. Advances in Spatial Databases. LNCS 951, Springer-Verlag, (1995) 47-66.
15. Koperski, K.: Progressive Refinement Approach to Spatial Data Mining,Ph.D. thesis, Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, (1999).
16. Lisi, F.A., Malerba, D.: Inducing Multi-Level Association Rules from Multiple Relations. Machine Learning, (2004), to appear.
17. Liu, B., Hsu, W., Ma, Y.: Integratine classification and association rule mining. Proceedings of Knowledge Discovery in Databases KDD'98, New York, (1998).
18. Ludl, M.C., Widmer, G.: Relative Unsupervised Discretization for Association Rule Mining. PKDD'00, LNCS 1910, Springer-Verlag, (2000), 148-158.
19. Malerba D., A. Appice, & N. Vacca. SDMOQL: An OQL-based Data Mining Query Language for Map Interpretation Tasks. Proc. of the Workshop on Database Technologies for Data Mining (DTDM'02), Prague, Czech Republic, March 25-27, 2002
20. Malerba, D., Esposito, F., Lanza, A., Lisi, F.A., Appice, A.: Empowering a GIS with Inductive Learning Capabilities: The Case of INGENS. Journal of Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Elsevier Science, 27 (2003). 265-281.
21. Malerba, D.: Learning Recursive Theories in the Normal ILP Setting, Fundamenta Informaticae, 57, 1, (2003), 39-77.
22. May, M.: Spatial Knowledge Discovery: The SPIN! System. In: Fullerton, K. (ed.): Proceedings of the 6th EC-GIS Workshop, Lyon, JRC, Ispra, (2000).
23. Preparata, F., Shamos, M.: Computational Geometry: An Introduction. Springer-Verlag, New York (1985).
24. Shekhar, S., Schrater, P.R., Vatsavai, R. R., Wu, W., Chawla, S.: Spatial Contextual Classification and Prediction Models for Mining Geospatial Data. IEEE Transaction on Multimedia, 4(2) (2002) 174-188.
25. Pazzani, M., Mani, S., Shankle, W.R.: Beyond concise and colorful: learning intelligible rules. In Proceedings of Knowledge Discovery in Databases KDD'97, (1997).
26. Wrobel, S.: Inductive logic programming for knowledge discovery in databases. In: Džeroski, S., N. Lavra (eds.): Relational Data Mining, Springer: Berlin, (2001) 74-101.