Support for constructing theories in case law domains

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3180, Issue , 2004, Pages 508-517

  Chorley, Alison ^a   Bench Capon, Trevor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; EXPERT SYSTEMS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAWS; CASE LAW; CURRENT SITUATION; LEGAL CASE; LEGAL REASONING; PRACTICAL REASONING; THEORY CONSTRUCTION;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 35048834410     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30075-5_49     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Aleven, V. (1997). Teaching Case Based Argumentation Through an Example and Models. PhD Thesis. The University of Pittsburgh.
2. Ashley. K.D., (1990). Modelling Legal Argument. Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
3. Bench-Capon, T.J.M., and E.L., Rissland, 2001. Back to the Future: Dimensions Revisited. In B. Verheij, A.R. Lodder, R.P. Loui, and A. J. Muntjewerff (eds.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp41-52.
4. Bench-Capon, T.J.M., 2002. The Missing Link Revisited: The Role of Teleology in Representing Legal Argument, Artificial Intelligence and Law, volume 10, 1-3, pp 79-94.
5. Bench-Capon, T., and Sartor, G. 2003. A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values. Artificial Intelligence. Vol 150 1-2 pp97-143.
6. Berman, D.H., and C.L. Hafner. 1993. Representing Teleological Structure in Case Based Reasoning: The Missing Link. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on AI and Law, 50-59. ACM Press, New York.
7. Brüninghaus, S and Ashley, K.D. 2003. Predicting Outcomes of Case-based Legal Arguments. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on AI and Law. ACM Press, New York, 2003, pp233-42.
8. Chorley, A and Bench-Capon, T. 2003. Developing Legal Knowledge Based Systems Through Theory Construction. Technical Report ULCS-03-013, Department of Computer Science, The University of Liverpool, 2003.
9. Chorley, A., and Bench-Capon, T. 2002. Developing Legal Knowledge Based Systems Through Theory Construction. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on AI and Law: ACM Press, New York, 2002, pp85-6.
10. Chorley, A., and Bench-Capon, T. 20023. Reasoning With Legal Cases as Theory Construction: Some Experimental Results. In D. Bourcier (ed.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: Jurix 2003. IOS Press: Amsterdam.
11. McCarty, L.T. 1995. An Implementation of Eisner v Macomber. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on AI and Law, 276-286. ACM Press: New York.
12. Prakken, H. 2000. An exercise in formalising teleological case based reasoning. In J. Breuker, R. Leenes and R. Winkels (eds.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: Jurix 2000, 49-57. IOS Press, Amsterdam.