On the localization of knowledge through practice: The constitution of sites of learning via routines, objects and circulation;Zur lokalisierung von wissen durch praxis: Die konstitution von orten des lernens über routinen, objekte und zirkulation

Geographische Zeitschrift

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 98-115

  Ibert, Oliver ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CULTURE; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING;

EID: 35048832982     PISSN: 00167479     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I. and McHale, J. (2006): Gone but not Forgotten. Knowledge Flows, Labor Mobility, and Enduring Social Relationships. Journal of Economic Geography 6, S. 571-591.
2. Akrich, M. (1992): The De-scription of Technical Objects. W. E. Bijker and J. Law (eds.): Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA./London. S. 205-224.
3. Allen, J. (2000): Power/Economic Knowledge. Symbolic and Spatial Formations. J. R. Bryson, P. W. Daniels, N. Henry and J. Pollard (eds.): _knowledge_space_economy. London. S. 15-33.
4. Amin, A. and Cohendet, P. (2004): Architectures of Knowledge. Firms, Capabilities and Communities. Oxford.
5. Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (2007): Cultural-Economy and Cities. Progress in Human Geography 31, S. 143-161.
6. Ancori, B., Bureth, A. and Cohendet, P. (2000): The Economics of Knowledge. The Debate about Codification and Tacit Knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change 9, S. 255-287.
7. Arthur, W. B. (2007): The Structure of Invention. Research Policy 36, S. 274-287.
8. Barnes, B. (1974): Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London.
9. Barnes, T. J. (2004): Placing Ideas. Genius Loci, Heterotopia and Geography's Quantitative Revolution. Progress in Human Geography 28, S. 565-595.
10. Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (2004): Clusters and Knowledge. Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation. Progress in Human Geography 28, S. 31-56.
11. Becker, E. (2001): Die postindustrielle Wissensgesellschaft - ein moderner Mythos? Zeitschrift für kritische Theorie 12/2001, S. 85-106.
12. Bloor, D. (1976): Knowledge and Social Imagery. London.
13. Breschi, S. and Lissoni, F. (2001): Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems. A Critical Survey. Industrial and Corporate Change 10, S. 975-1005.
14. Callon, M. (1986): Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation. Domestication of the Scallops in Saint Brieuc Bay. J. Law (ed.): Power, Action and Believe. A New Sociology of Knowledge? London/Boston/Henley. S. 196-233.
15. Coe, N. M. and Bunell, T. (2003): 'Spatializing' Knowledge Communities. Towards a Conceptualisation of Transnational Innovation Networks. Global Networks 3, S. 437-456.
16. Collins, H. M. (2001): What is Tacit Knowledge? T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina and E. v. Savigny (eds.): The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London. S. 107-119.
17. Cooke, P. (1998): Introduction. Origins of the Concept. H.-J. Braczyk, P. Cooke and M. Heidenreich (eds.): Regional Innovation Systems. The Role of Governances in a Globalized World. London. S. 2-25.
18. Cortazzi, M. (2001): Narrative Analysis in Ethnography. P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland and L. Lofland (eds.): Handbook of Ethnography. London/Thousand Oaks/New Dehli. S. 384-394.
19. Cowan, R., David, P. A. and Foray, D. (2000): The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change 9, S. 211-253.
20. de Laet, M. (2000): Patents, Travels, Space. Ethnographic Encounters with Objects in Transit. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18, S. 149-169.
21. Demeritt, D. (1996): Social Theory and the Reconstruction of Science and Geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 21, S. 484-503.
22. Drucker, P. F. (1993): Post-Capitalist Society. New York.
23. Enright, M. J. (2003): Regional Clusters. What We Know and what We Should Know. J. Brocker, D. Dohse and R. Soltwedel (eds.): Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition. Berlin. S. 99-129.
24. Ettlinger, N. (2007): Unchaining the Micro. SECONS Discussion Forum Contribution No. 11 (www.giub.uni-bonn.de/grabher/index.html).
25. Gertler, M. (2003): Tacit Knowledge and the Economic Geography of Context, or: The Undefinable Tacitness of Being (There). Journal of Economic Geography 3, S. 75-99.
26. Girard M. and Stark, D. (2002): Distributing Intelligence and Organizing Diversity in New-Media Projects. Environment and Planning A 34, S. 1927-1949.
27. Grabher, G. (1994): Lob der Verschwendung. Redundanz in der Regionalentwicklung. Ein sozioökonomisches Plädoyer. Berlin.
28. Håkanson, L. (2005): Epistemic Communities and Cluster Dynamics. On the Role of Knowledge in Industrial Districts. Industry and Innovation 12, S. 433-463.
29. Haraway, D. (2000): Morphing in the Order. Flexible Strategies, Feminist Science Studies, and Primate Revisions. S. Strum and L. Fedigan (eds.): Primate Encounters. Chicago. S. 398-420.
30. Hinchcliffe, S. (1996): Technology, Power, and Space - the Means and Ends of Geographies of Technology. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14, S. 659-682.
31. Ibert, O. (2007): Towards a Geography of Knowledge Creation. The Ambivalences between 'Knowledge as an Object' and 'Knowing in Practice'. Regional Studies 41, S. 103-114.
32. Jöns, H. (2003): Grenzüberschreitende Mobilität und Kooperation in den Wissenschaften. Deutschlandaufenthalte US-amerikanischer Humboldt-Forschungspreisträger aus einer erweiterten Akteursnetzwerkperspektive. - Heidelberger Geographische Arbeiten 116. Heidelberg.
33. Knorr Cetina, K. (1981): The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford.
34. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999) : Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA.
35. Knorr Cetina, K. (2001): Objectual Practice. T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina and E. v. Savigny (eds.): The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London. S. 175-188.
36. Knorr Cetina, K. and Bruegger, U. (2002): Global Microstructures. The Virtual Societies of Financial Markets. American Journal of Sociology 107, S. 905-950.
37. Latour, B. (1987): Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA.
38. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979): Laboratory Life. The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London.
39. Law, J. (1986): On the Methods of Long-Distance Control. Vessels, Navigation and the Portuguese Route to India. J. Law (ed.): Power, Action and Believe. A New Sociology of Knowledge? London/Boston/Henley. S. 234-263.
40. Law, J. (1992): Notes on the Theory of the Actor Network. Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity. Centre for Science Studies. Lancaster University, Lancaster.
41. Law, J. (2000): Objects, Spaces and Others. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University. Lancaster.
42. Livingstone, D. N. (1995): The Spaces of Knowledge. Contributions towards a Historical Geography of Science. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13, S. 5-34.
43. Livingstone, D. N. (2002): Science, Space and Hermeneutics. Hettner Lecture 2001. - Hettner-Lectures 5. Heidelberg.
44. Livingstone, D. N. (2003): Putting Science in its Place. Geographies of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago.
45. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1988): Innovation as an Interactive Process. From Producer-User Interaction to the National System of Innovation. G. Dosi, C. Freeman, C. Nelson, R. R. Silverberg and L. L. G. Soete (eds.): Technical Change and Economic Theory. London/New York. S. 349-369.
46. Malliat, D. (1998): Vom 'Industrial District' zum innovativen Milieu: ein Beitrag zur Analyse lokalisierter Produktionssysteme. Geographische Zeitschrift 86, S. 1-15.
47. Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (2002): The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies. Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering. Environment and Planning A 34, S. 429-449.
48. Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A. (1999): The Competitiveness of Firms and Regions. 'Ubiquitification' and the Importance of Localized Learning. European Urban and Regional Studies 6, S. 9-25.
49. Massey, D. (2005): For Space. London/Thousand Oaks/New Dehli.
50. Matthiesen, U. (2004): Wissen in Stadtregionen. Forschungsresultate und Streitfragen, Orientierungswissen und Handlungsoptionen. U. Matthiesen (Hrsg.): Stadtregion und Wissen. Analysen und Plädoyers für eine wissensbasierte Stadtpolitik. Opladen. S. 11-28.
51. Mattsson, H. ( 2006): How Does Knowledge Production Take Place? On Locating and Mapping Science and Similar Unruly Activities. E. Baraldi, H. Fors and A. Houltz (eds.): Taking Place: Locating Science, Technology and Business Studies. Sagamore Beach, MA. S. 351-371.
52. Meusburger, P. (1998): Bildungsgeographie. Wissen und Ausbildung in der räumlichen Dimension. Heidelberg/Berlin.
53. Meusburger, P. (2000): The Spatial Concentration of Knowledge. Some Theoretical Considerations. Erdkunde 54, S. 352-364.
54. Morgan, K. (2004): The Exaggerated Death of Geography. Learning, Proximity and Territorial Innovation Systems. Journal of Economic Geography 4, S. 3-21.
55. Nooteboom, B. (2001): Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies. Oxford.
56. Orlikowski, W. (2002): Knowing in Practice. Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing. Organization Science 13, S. 249-273.
57. Paschen, H., Coenen, C., Fleischer, T., Grünwald, R., Oertel, D. und Revermann, C. (2004): Nanotechnologie. Forschung, Entwicklung, Anwendung. Berlin/Heidelberg.
58. Powell, R. C. (2007): Geographies of Science. Histories, Localities, Practices, Futures. Progress in Human Geography 31, S. 309-329.
59. Rouse, J. (1996): Engaging Science. How to Understand its Practices Philosophically. Ithaka/London.
60. Schön, D. A. (1983): The Reflective Practitioner. New York.
61. Scott, A. J. (1988): New Industrial Spaces. London.
62. Secord, J. A. (2004): Knowledge in Transit. ISIS 95, S. 654-672.
63. Shapin, S. (1995): Here and Everywhere. Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology 21, S. 289-321.
64. Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1985): Leviathan and the Air-pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ.
65. Spradley, J. P. (1979): The Ethnographic Interview. New York.
66. Spradley, J. P. (1980): Participant Observation. New York.
67. Stehr, N. (2001): Wissen und Wirtschaften. Die gesellschaftlichen Grundlagen der modernen Ökonomie. Frankfurt am Main.
68. Storper, M. and Venables, A. J. (2004): Buzz. Face-to-face Contact and the Urban Economy. Journal of Economic Geography 4, S. 351-370.
69. Suchman, L. A. (1987): Plans and Situated Actions. The Problem of Human Machine Communication. New York/Melbourne.
70. Thrift, N. (1999): Steps to an Ecology of Place. D. Massey, J. Allen and P. Sarre (eds.): Human Geography Today. Cambridge. S. 295-322.
71. Thrift, N. (2006): Re-inventing Invention. New Tendencies in Capitalist Commodification. Economy and Society 35, S. 279-306.
72. Vinck, D. (2003): Socio-technical Complexity: Redesigning a Shielding Wall. D. Vinck (ed.): Everyday Engineering. An Ethnography of Design and Innovation. Cambridge, MA. S. 13-27.
73. Weichhart, P. (2004): Action Setting - ein unmögliches Forschungsprojekt. Raum 54, S. 44-49.