Rule execution in graph-based incremental interactive integration tools

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3256, Issue , 2004, Pages 22-38

  Becker, Simon M ^a   Lohmann, Sebastian ^a   Westfechtel, Bernhard ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAPH THEORY; INTEGRATION;

DESIGN DOCUMENTS; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES; GRAPH TRANSFORMATION; GRAPH-BASED; INTEGRATION TOOLS; RULE APPLICATION;

GRAPHIC METHODS;

EID: 35048828475     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30203-2_4     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. de Lara, J., Vangheluwe, H.: Computer aided multi-paradigm modelling to process petri-nets and statecharts. In: Proc. of 1st Int. Conf. on Graph Transformations (ICGT 2002). LNCS 2505, Springer (2002) 239-253
2. Baresi, L., Mauri, M., Pezzè, M.: PLCTools: Graph transformation meets PLC design. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 72 (2002)
3. Schürr, A.: Specification of graph translators with triple graph grammars. In: Proc. of the 20th Intl. Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (WG 1994). LNCS 903, Herrsching, Germany, Springer (1995) 151-163
4. Becker, S.M., Westfechtel, B.: Incremental integration tools for chemical engineering: An industrial application of triple graph grammars. In: Proc. of the 29th Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (WG 2003). LNCS 2880, Springer (2003) 46-57
5. Lohmann, S.: Ausführung von Integrationsregeln mit einem Graphersetzungssystem. Master's thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Germany (2004)
6. Nagl, M., Marquardt, W.: SFB-476 IMPROVE: Informatische Unterstützung übergreifender Entwicklungsprozesse in der Verfahrenstechnik. In: Informatik '97: Informatik als Innovationsmotor. Informatik aktuell, Aachen, Germany, Springer (1997) 143-154
7. innotec GmbH: COMOS PT Documentation, http://www.innotec.de. (2003)
8. Aspen-Technology: Aspen Plus Documentation, http://www.aspentech.com. (2003)
9. Becker, S., Haase, T., Westfechtel, B., Wilhelms, J.: Integration tools supporting cooperative development processes in chemical engineering. In: Proc. of the 6th Biennial World Conf. on Integrated Design and Process Technology (IDPT-2002), Pasadena, California, USA, Society for Design and Process Science (2002) 10 pp.
10. Schürr, A., Winter, A., Zündorf, A.: The PROGRES approach: Language and environment. Volume 2. World Scientific (1999) 487-550
11. Lefering, M., Schürr, A.: Specification of integration tools. [12] 324-334
12. Nagl, M., ed.: Building Tightly-Integrated Software Development Environments: The IPSEN Approach. LNCS 1170. Springer, Berlin, Germany (1996)
13. Becker, S.M., Haase, T., Westfechtel, B.: Model-based a-posteriori integration of engineering tools for incremental development processes. Journal of Software and Systems Modeling (2004) to appear.
14. Spanoudakis, G., Zisman, A.: Inconsistency management in software engineering: Survey and open research issues. In: Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. Volume 1. World Scientific (2001) 329-380
15. Enders, B.E., Heverhagen, T., Goedicke, M., Tröpfner, P., Tracht, R.: Towards an integration of different specification methods by using the viewpoint framework. Transactions of the SDPS 6 (2002) 1-23
16. Finkelstein, A., Kramer, J., Goedicke, M.: ViewPoint oriented software development. In: Intl. Workshop on Software Engineering and Its Applications. (1990) 374-384
17. Taentzer, G., Koch, M., Fischer, I., Volle, V: Distributed graph transformation with application to visual design of distributed systems. In: Handbook on Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation: Concurrency, Parallelism, and Distribution. Volume 3. World Scientific (1999) 269-340
18. Wagner, R., Giese, H., Nickel, U.A.: A plug-in for flexible and incremental consistency mangement. In: Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on the Unified Modeling Language (UML 2003), San Francisco, California, USA, Springer (2003)
19. OMG Architecture Board ORMSC: Model driven architecture (MDA) (2001)
20. Gerber, A., Lawley, M., Raymond, K., Steel, J., Wood, A.: Transformation: The missing link of MDA. In: Proc. of 1st Intl. Conf. on Graph Transformations (ICGT 2002). LNCS 2505, Barcelona, Spain, Springer (2002) 90-105
21. Kent, S., Smith, R.: The Bidirectional Mapping Problem. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 82 (2003)
22. Appukuttan, B.K., Clark, T., Reddy, S., Tratt, L., Venkatesh, R.: A model driven approach to model transformations. In: Proc. of the 2003 Model Driven Architecture: Foundations and Applications (MDAFA2003). CTIT Technical Report TR-CTIT-03-27, Univ. of Twente, The Netherlands (2003)
23. OMG: MOF 2.0 query / view / transformations, request for proposal (2002)
24. Akehurst, D., Kent, S., Patrascoiu, O.: A relational approach to defining and implementing transformations between metamodels. Journal on Software and Systems Modeling 2 (2003)
25. Braun, P., Marschall, F.: Transforming object oriented models with BOTL. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 72 (2003)