Human-generated learning object metadata

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3292, Issue , 2004, Pages 723-730

  Brasher, Andrew ^a   McAndrew, Patrick ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

E-LEARNING RESOURCES; LEARNING OBJECT METADATA; METADATA GENERATION; PRODUCTION PROCESS; SHARED UNDERSTANDING;

METADATA;

EID: 35048827474     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_83     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. IEEE, IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata, in IEEE Std 1484.12.1-2002. 2002, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. p. i-32.
2. Sebastiani, F., Machine Learning in Automated Text Categorization. ACM Computing Surveys, 2002. 34(1).
3. Lam, W., M. Ruiz, and P. Srinivasan, Automatic Text Categorization and Its Application to Text Retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 1999.11(6): p. 865-879.
4. Liddy, E.D., et al. Automatic metadata generation & evaluation, in Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 2002. Tampere, Finland: ACM Press.
5. Deerwester, S., et al., Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the Society for Information Science, 1990.41(6): p. 391-407.
6. METAe - Meta Data Engine. Vol. 2003. 2002: The METAe project group. http://metae.aib.uni-linz.ac.at/.
7. Brunelli, R., O. Mich, and C.M. Modena, A Survey on the Automatic Indexing of Video Data, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 1999. 10(2): p. 78-112.
8. Ngan, K.N., et al., eds. Special issue on segmentation, description and retrieval of video content. 1998.
9. Marshall, C. Making Metadata: a study of metadata creation for a mixed physical-digital collection, in ACM Digital Libraries '98 Conference. 1998. Pittsburgh, PA.
10. Currier, S., et al., Quality Assurance for Digital Learning Object Repositories: Issues for the Metadata Creation Process. ALT-J, research in Learning Technology, 2004. 12(1): p. 6-20.
11. Chan, L.M., Inter-Indexer Consistency in Subject Cataloging. Information Technology and Libraries, 1989. 8(4): p. 349-358.
12. GEM, The Gateway to Educational Materials. 2003. http://www.thegateway. org/.
13. Brasher, A. and P. McAndrew, Metadata vocabularies for describing learning objects: implementation and exploitation issues. Learning Technology, 2003. 5(1). http://lttf.ieee.org/learn_tech/issues/january2003/.
14. Kabel, S., R.d. Hoog, and B.J. Wielinga. Consistency in Indexing Learning Objects: an Empirical Investigation, in ED-Media 2003. 2003. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
15. IMS, IMS Vocabulary Definition Exchange. 2004. http://www.imsglobal.org/ vdex/.
16. Clark, J., XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.0.1999, W3C. http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt.
17. Sharples, M., et al., Socio-Cognitive Engineering: A Methodology for the Design of Human-Centred Technology. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002. 136(2): p. 310-323.
18. UKeU, Postgraduate Certificate in Online and Distance Education. 2003/4. http://www.ukeu.com/courses/connectedeconomy/courses_connectedeconomy_programme. php?site=.
19. Weller, M., C. Pegler, and R. Mason, Working with learning objects - some pedagogical suggestions. 2003. http://iet.open.ac.uk/pp/mj.weller/pub/altc.doc.
20. McGuinness, D.L. and F.v. Harmelen, OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. 2003, W3C. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.
21. Abecker, A. and R. Tellmann, Analysis of Interaction between Semantic Web Languages, P2P architectures, and Agents. 2003, SWWS - Semantic Web Enabled Web Services project IST-2002-37134. http://swws.semanticweb.org/public_doc/D1.3. pdf.