The perceptual influence of spatiotemporal noise reconstruction of shape from dynamic occlusion

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3175, Issue , 2004, Pages 407-414

  Cooke, Theresa ^a   Cunningham, Douglas W ^a   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS;

DYNAMIC NOISE; EDGE ORIENTATIONS; EDGE SEGMENTS; MATHEMATICAL FRAMEWORKS; S VELOCITY; SHAPE RECOGNITION; SPATIOTEMPORAL NOISE; TEXTURE TRANSFORMATION;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

EID: 35048817528     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-28649-3_50     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. J. J. Gibson, G. A. Kaplan, H. N. Reynolds, Jr., and K. Wheeler. The change from visible to invisible: A study of optical transitions. Perception & Psychophysics, 5:113 - 116, 1969.
2. T. F. Shipley and D. W. Cunningham. Perception of occluding and occluded objects over time: Spatiotemporal segmentation and unit formation. In T. R Shipley and P. J. Kellman, editors, From fragments to objects: Segmentation and grouping in vision, pages 557 - 585. Elsevier Science, Oxford, 2001.
3. T. F. Shipley and P. J. Kellman. Optical tearing in spatiotemporal boundary formation: When do local element motions produce boundaries, form, and global motion? Spatial Vision: Special Issue: In honor of Bela Julesz, 7:323 - 339, 1993.
4. T. F. Shipley and P. J. Kellman. Spatiotemporal boundary formation: Boundary, form, and motion perception from transformations of surface elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123:3-20, 1994.
5. T. F. Shipley and P. J. Kellman. Spatiotemporal boundary formation: The role of local motion signals in boundary perception. Vision Research, 37:1281 - 1293, 1997.
6. D.W. Cunningham, A.B.A. Graf, and H.H. Billthoff. A relative encoding approach to modelling spatiotemporal boundary formation. Journal of Vision, VSS Abstract, page 120, 2002.
7. D.W. Cunningham, A.B.A. Graf, T. Cooke, C. Wallraven, and H.H. Bülthoff. The perception of objects from dynamic occlusion: A relative encoding implementation, under review, 2004.
8. T. Cooke, D. W. Cunningham, and C. Wallraven:. Local processing in spatiotemporal boundary formation. Proceedings of the 7th Tübingen Perception Conference, page 65, 2004.
9. . S. Grossberg and E. Mingolla. Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. Psychological Review, 92:173-211, 1985.
10. T. F. Shipley and P. J. Kellman. Boundary completion in illusory contours: Interpolation or extrapolation? Perception, 32:985-999, 2003.
11. Lance R. Williams and David W. Jacobs. Stochastic completion fields: A neural model of illusory contour shape and salience. Neural Computation, 9(4):837-858, 1997.
12. D. W. Cunningham, T. F. Shipley, and P. J. Kellman. Interactions between spatial and spatiotemporal information in spatiotemporal boundary formation. Perception & Psychophysics, 60:839-851, 1998.
13. H. Wallach. Über visuell warhgenomme bewegungsrichtung. Psychologische Forshcung, 20:325 - 380, 1935.
14. D. W. Cunningham, T. F. Shipley, and P. J. Kellman. The dynamic specification of surfaces and boundaries. Perception, 27:403-416, 1998.