Introducing quality system in small and medium enterprises: An experience report

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3009, Issue , 2004, Pages 131-145

  Aversano, Lerina ^a   Canfora, Gerardo ^a   Capasso, Giovanni ^b   Di Lucca, Giuseppe A ^a   Visaggio, Corrado A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANNIO   (Italy)

^b Elisys Srl   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

CONTROL AND MONITORING; EXPERIENCE REPORT; MANAGERIAL EFFICIENCIES; QUALITY CERTIFICATION; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISE; SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISE; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 35048816507     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24659-6_10     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aversano L., CimitileA, De Lucia A., Stefanucci S., Villani M. L., (2003). Workflow Management in the GENESIS Environment., 2nd Workshop on Cooperative Support for Distributed Software Engineering Processes, Benevento, Italy, 2003.
2. Bandinelli S., Fuggetta A., and Ghezzi C. (1993). Software Process Evolution in the SPADE environment, IEEE Transactions Software Engineering, vol. 19, no.12, pag 1-144.
3. Blaha R., Premerlani E., and Lorensen (1991). Object-Oriented model and design. Englewoof Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
4. Conradi R., Orjord E., Westby P. H., and Liu C. (1991). Initial Software Process Management in EPOS. Software Engineering Journal, 6(5):275-284.
5. Curtis B., Kellner M.I., and Over J. (1992). Process Modeling. Communications of the ACM, 35(9), 75-90.
6. De Gregorio E. (2003). Modellazione di Business Process e Valutazione della Qualità di uno strumento Sofwtare a Supporto. Laurea Thesis, University of Naples Federico II, Dept. Of Computer Science and Systems.
7. Hammer M., & Champy J. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, NY: HarperCollins.
8. th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
9. International Standard: ISO 9000:2000 "Quality Management Systems - Fundamentals and vocabulary", 28 novembre 2001.
10. th IEEE International Symposium on Software Metrics.
11. Jacobson I., Ericsson M., & Jacobson A. (1995). The Object Advantage: Business Process Reengineering with Object Technology. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, 1995.
12. th IEEE International Symposium and Forum on Software Engineering Standards.
13. Mark C. Paulk, Bill Curtis, Mary Beth Chrissis, and Charles V. Weber (1993). "Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1", Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-93-TR-24, DTIC Number ADA263403, February 1993.
14. Miller G. (2001). Sizing up Today's Lightweight Software Processes. IT Porfessional, May 2001, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 46-49.
15. Oracle Workflow, web site http://www.oracle.com/appsnet/products/procurement/collateral/ds_workflow.html
16. Pan D., (1997). Modeling Software Process, web site http://sern.ucalgary.ca/courses/seng/621/W97/pand/essay.html;
17. st Workshop on Cooperative Supports for Distributed Software Engineering Processes, Oxford, UK, IEEE Computer Society Press, 2002.
18. Rombach H.D. and Verlage M., (1995). Directions in Software Process reasearch. Advances in Computer, Academic Press, (41): 1-63.
19. Staffware plc, web site http://www.staffware.com/
20. Ultimus, web site http://www.ultimus.com/
21. Victor R. Basili, (1992). Software modeling and measurement: The Goal/Question/Metric paradigm. Technical Report CS-TR-2956, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, September 1992.
22. Van Solingen R., Berbhout E., (1999). The Goal/Question/Metric Method. McGraw-Hill.
23. Zettel J. (2000), Spearmint Multi-View Architecture, Technical Report Fraunhofer Institute of Software Engineering, Kaiserslautern, Germany, IESE-Report No. 013.99/E, Version 1.0.