Resampling programs for multiway contingency tables with fixed marginal frequency totals

Psychological Reports

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 18-24

  Mielke Jr , Paul W ^a   Berry, Kenneth J ^a   Johnston, Janis E ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 34948910737     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/PR0.101.1.18-24     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BALMER, D. W. (1988) Algorithm AS 236. Recursive enumeration of r×c tables for exact likelihood evaluation. Applied Statistics, 37, 290-301.
2. BOYETT, J. M. (1979) Algorithm AS 144. Random R×C tables with given row and column totals. Applied Statistics, 28, 329-332.
3. BROWN, L., SHERBENOU, R. J., & JOHNSEN, S. K. (1997) Test of Nonverbal Intelligence, Version 3. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
4. COHEN, J. (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
5. COHEN, J. (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213-220,
6. CRAMER, H. (1946) Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univer. Press.
7. GOODMAN, L. A., &KRUSKAL, W. H. (1954) Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732-764.
8. GRAVETTER, F. J., & WALLNAU, L. B. (2004) Statistics for the behavioral sciences. (6th ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
9. HAYS, W. L. (1988) Statistics. (4th ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
10. HOWELL, D. C. (2002) Statistical methods for psychology. (5th ed.) Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
11. KENDALL, M. G. (1938) A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, 30, 81-89.
12. MIELKE, P. W., & BERRY, K. J. (1988) Cumulant methods for analyzing independence of rway contingency tables and goodness-of-fit frequency data. Biometrika, 75, 790-793.
13. MIELKE, P. W., BERRY, K. J., & JOHNSTON, J. E. (2004) Asymptotic log-linear analysis: some cautions concerning sparse frequency tables. Psychological Reports, 94, 19-32.
14. PATEFIELD, W. M. (1981) Algorithm AS 159. An efficient method of generating random R×C tables with given row and column totals. Applied Statistics, 30, 91-97.
15. PEARSON, K. (1900) On a criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can reasonably be supposed to have arisen in random sampling. Philosophical Magazine, 50, 157-175.
16. SAUNDERS, I. W. (1984) Algorithm AS 205. Enumeration of R×C tables with repeated row totals. Applied Statistics, 33, 340-352.
17. WICKENS, T. D. (1989) Multiway contingency tables analysis for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. WILKS, S. S. (1935) The likelihood test of independence in contingency tables. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 6, 190-196.
19. WILKS, S. S. (1938) The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 9, 60-62.