Identifying the persuasive effects of presidential advertising

American Journal of Political Science

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 957-977

  Huber, Gregory A ^a   Arceneaux, Kevin ^b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34948907232     PISSN: 00925853     EISSN: 15405907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00291.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alvarez, R. Michael. 2001. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
2. Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York : Free Press.
3. Ansolabehere, Stephen, Shanto Iyengar, and Adam Simon. 1999 Replicating Experiments Using Aggregate and Survey Data American Political Science Review 93 (4 901 10.
4. Arceneaux, Kevin, Alan S. Gerber, and Donald P. Green. 2006 Comparing Experimental and Matching Methods Using a Large-Scale Field Experiment on Voter Mobilization Political Analysis 14 (1 37 62.
5. Ashworth, Scott, and Joshua D. Clinton. 2007 Does Advertising Exposure Affect Turnout? Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2 (1 27 41.
6. Atkin, Charles, and Gary Heald. 1976 Effects of Political Advertising Public Opinion Quarterly 93 (4 901 10.
7. Brader, Ted. 2005 Striking a Responsive Chord American Journal of Political Science 49 (2 388 405.
8. Brians, Craig Leonard, and Martin P. Wattenberg. 1996 Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience American Journal of Political Science 40 (1 172 93.
9. Campbell, James E. 2000. The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote. College Station : Texas A&M University Press.
10. Finkel, Steven E. 1993 Re-examining the 'Minimal Effects' Model in Recent Presidential Campaigns Journal of Politics 55 (1 1 21.
11. Freedman, Paul, Michael Franz, and Kenneth Goldstein. 2004 Campaign Advertising and Democratic Citizenship American Journal of Political Science 48 (4 723 41.
12. Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1993 Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable? British Journal of Political Science 23 (4 409 51.
13. Goldstein, Kenneth, Michael Franz, and Travis Ridout. 2002 Political Advertising in 2000 Combined File [dataset]. Final release. Madison, WI.
14. Goldstein, Kenneth, and Travis N. Ridout. 2004 Measuring the Effects of Televised Political Advertising in the United States Annual Review of Political Science 7 : 205 26.
15. Hillygus, D. Sunshine. 2005 Campaign Effects and the Dynamics of Turnout Intention in Election 2000 Journal of Politics 67 (1 50 68.
16. Iyengar, Shanto, and Adam F. Simon. 2000 New Perspectives and Evidence on Political Communication and Campaign Effects Annual Review of Psychology 51 : 149 69.
17. Johnston, Richard, Michael G. Hagen, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2004. The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
18. King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
19. Klapper, Joseph T. 1960. The Effects of Mass Communication. Glencoe, IL : Free Press.
20. Krasno, Jonathan S., and Donald P. Green. n.d. Do Televised Presidential Ads Increase Voter Turnout? Journal of Politics. Forthcoming.
21. Lippmann, Walter. 1922. Public Opinion. New York : Free Press.
22. Lupia, Arthur. 1994 Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias American Political Science Review 88 (1 63 76.
23. Marks, Peter. 2000 The 2000 Campaign: The Spending on Ads: Bush Has Advertised More in California Than in Swing States New York Times, Oct. 31 : A23.
24. Price, Vincent, and John Zaller. 1993 Who Gets the News? Alternative Measures of News Reception and Their Implication for Research Public Opinion Quarterly 57 (2 133 64.
25. Romer, Daniel, Kate Kenski, Paul Waldman, Christopher Adasiewicz, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2004. Capturing Campaign Dynamics. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
26. Shaw, Daron R. 1999 The Effects of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988-96 American Political Science Review 93 (2 345 61.
27. Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King. 2003. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1. Available at http://gking.harvard.edu/.
28. Vavreck, Lynn. 2000 How Does It All 'Turnout'? In Campaign Reform: Insights and Evidence, ed. Larry M. Bartels and Lynn Vavreck. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, pp. 79 105.
29. Vavreck, Lynn. 2001 The Reasoning Voter Meets the Strategic Candidate American Politics Research 29 (5 507 29.
30. Vavreck, Lynn. n.d. The Dangers of Self-Reports of Political Behavior Quarterly Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.
31. Wielhouwer, Peter W. 2003 In Search of Lincoln's Perfect List: Targeting in Grassroots Campaigns American Politics Research 31 : 632 69.
32. Wlezien, Christopher, and Robert S. Erikson. 2002 The Timeline of Presidential Election Campaigns Journal of Politics 64 (4 969 93.
33. Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Public Opinion. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
34. Zaller, John. 1996 The Myth of Massive Media Impact Revived In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, ed. D. Mutz, P. Sniderman, and R. Brody. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, pp. 17 78.
35. Zhao, Xinshu, and Steven H. Chaffee. 1995 Campaign Advertisements versus Television News as Sources of Political Issue Information Public Opinion Quarterly 59 (1 41 65.