An internet-based symptom questionnaire that is reliable, valid, and available to psychiatrists, neurologists, and psychologists

MedGenMed Medscape General Medicine

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2007, Pages

  Gualtieri, C Thomas ^a  

^a North Carolina Neuropsychiatry Clinics   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; AGORAPHOBIA; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; COMPULSION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION; FATIGUE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYPERACTIVITY; IMPULSIVENESS; INTERNET; LEARNING DISORDER; MANIA; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MEMORY; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL INSTABILITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; OBSESSION; PAIN; PANIC; PSYCHIATRIST; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOLOGIST; PSYCHOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SLEEP; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOMATIZATION; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; SUICIDE; SYMPTOM; VALIDATION PROCESS; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES;

DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34948894996     PISSN: 15310132     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG, Benedict KB. Psychometric and clinical properties of a new computerized neurocognitive screening battery. Program and abstracts of the ANPA Annual Meeting; February 24-25, 2004; Bal Harbor, Florida.
2. Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG, Benedict, KB. Neurocognition in depression: patients on and off medication, compared to normal controls. J Neuropsych Clin Neurosci. 2006;18:217-225.
3. Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG. A computerized neurocognitive test battery for studies of schizophrenic and bipolar patients. Schiz Res. 2006;81:122. Abstract.
4. Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG. Neurocognitive testing supports a broader concept of mild cognitive impairment. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2006;20:359-366.
5. Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG. Efficient allocation of attentional resources in patients with ADHD: maturational changes from age 10 to 29. J Attention Dis. 2006;9:534-542.
6. Slade M, McCrone P, Kuipers E, et al. The use of standardized outcome measures in adult mental health services: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;189:330-336. Abstract
7. Kesselheim AS, Ferris TG, Studdert DM. Will physician-level measures of clinical performance be used in medical malpractice litigation? JAMA. 2006;15:1831-1834.
8. Bagby RM, Ryder AG, Schuller DR, Marshall MB. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: has the gold standard become a lead weight?. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;61:2163-2177.
9. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, Second Edition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1995.
10. Mowbray RM. Psychometrics & psychopharmacology. In: Burrows GD, Werry JS, eds. Advances in Human Psychopharmacology. Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press; 1981:129-182.
11. Symonds PM. On the loss of reliability in ratings due to the coarseness of the scale. J Exp Psychol. 1924;17:456-461.
12. Garner WR. Rating scales, discriminability, and information transmission. Psychol Rev. 1960;67:343-352. Abstract
13. Preston CC, Colman AM. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000;104:1-15. Abstract
14. Schutz HG, Rucker MH. Variable configurations across scale lengths: an empirical study. Educ Psychol Measurement. 1975;35:319-324.