Designer driving: Drivers' conceptual models and level of trust in adaptive cruise control

International Journal of Vehicle Design

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 339-360

  Kazi, Tarannum Ayesha ^a   Stanton, Neville A ^b,c,d,e,f   Walker, Guy H ^b   Young, Mark S ^b  

^a Intelligent Transportation Systems   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Human Centred Design   (United Kingdom)

^d BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY   (United Kingdom)

^e Ergonomics Society   (United Kingdom)

^f RSA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ACC; Adaptive cruise control; DCM; Drivers' conceptual models; Longitudinal study; Trust

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RELIABILITY;

ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL; DRIVERS' CONCEPTUAL MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY;

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS;

EID: 34948881227     PISSN: 01433369     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJVD.2007.014909     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bainbridge, L. (1982) 'Ironies of automation', in Rasmussen, J., Duncan, K. and Neplat, J. (Eds.): New Technology and Human Error, Wiley, New York, pp.151-157.
2. Besnard, D., Greathead, D. and Baxter, G. (2004) 'When mental models go wrong: co-occurrences in dynamic, critical systems', International Journal of Human - Computer Studies, Vol. 60, pp.117-128.
3. Carsten, O. (2005) 'Mind over matter: who's controlling the vehicle and how do we know', in Underwood, G. (Ed.): Traffic and Transport Psychology Theory and Application, Elsevier Ltd., The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Oxford 0X5 1GB UK, ISBN 0080443796, pp.231-242.
4. Endsley, M.R. and Kaber, D.B. (1999) 'Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task', Ergonomics, Vol. 42, pp.462-492.
5. Fancher, P., Ervin, R. and Bogard, S. (1998) 'Behavioural reactions to advanced cruise control: results of a driving simulator experiment', in van der Heijden, R.E.C.M. and Wiethoff, M. (Eds.): Automation of Car Driving. Exploring Societal Impacts and Conditions, TRAIL Research School Delft, pp.103, 104.
6. Harmon-Jones, E. and Mills, J. (1999) Cognitive Dissonance: Progress on a Pivotal Theory in Social Psychology, American Psychological Association, Washington DC, p. 11.
7. Harris, D. and Harris, F. (2004) 'Evaluating the transfer of technology between application domains: a critical evaluation of the human component in the system', Technology in Society, Vol. 26, pp.551-565.
8. Hoedemaeker, M. and Brookhuis, K.A. (1998) 'Behavioural adaptation to driving with adaptive cruise control (ACC)', Transportation Research Record Part F, Vol. 1, pp.95-106.
9. Hoedemaeker, M. and Kopf, M. (2001) 'Visual Sampling Behaviour when driving with adaptive cruise control', Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Vision in Vehicles, Australia, August 19-22.
10. Kaber, D.B. and. Endsley, M.R. (2004) 'The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task', Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, March-April, pp.113-153.
11. Kantowitz, B.H., Hanowski, R.J. and Kantowitz, S.C. (1997) 'Driver acceptance of unreliable traffic information in familiar and unfamiliar settings', Human Factors, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp.164-176.
12. Lee, J. and Moray, N. (1992) 'Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human - machine systems', Ergonomics, Vol. 35, No. 10, pp.1243-1270.
13. Lee, J.D. and See, K.A. (2004) 'Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance', Human Factors, Vol. 46, No. 1, Spring, pp.50-80.
14. Lewandowsky, S., Mundy, M. and Tan, G.P.A. (2000) 'The dynamics of trust: comparing humans to automation', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 104-123.
15. Moray, N., Inagaki, T. and Itoh, M. (2000) 'Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks', Journal of Applied Experimental Psychology, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp.44-58.
16. Muir, B.M. (1994) 'Trust in automation: part 1. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems', Ergonomics, Vol. 37, No. 11, pp.1905-1922.
17. Muir, B.M. and Moray, N. (1996) 'Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies on trust and human intervention in a process control simulation', Ergonomics, Vol. 39, pp.429-461.
18. Norman, D. A. (1990) 'The 'problem' with automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction, not 'over-automation", Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society of London, Vol. B327, pp.585-593.
19. Parasuraman, R. and Riley, J. (1997) 'Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse', Human Factors, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp.230-253.
20. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B. and Wickens, C.D. (2000) 'A model of types and levels of human interaction with automation', IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 30, pp.286-297.
21. Preece, J., Rogers, Y. and Sharp, H. (2002) Interaction Design: Beyond Human-computer Interaction, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp.39-55.
22. Rasmussen, J., Petjerson, A.M. and Goodstein, L.P. (1994) Cognitive Systems Engineering, Wiley, New York.
23. Richardson, M., Barber, P., King, P., Hoare, E. and Cooper, D. (1997) 'Longitudinal driver support systems', Proceedings of Autotech '97, IMechE, London, pp.87-97.
24. Rudin-Brown, C.M. and Parker, H.A. (2004) 'Behavioural adaptation to Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC): implications for preventive strategies', Transportation Research Part, Vol. 2, No. 7, pp.59-76.
25. Sayer, J.R., Fancher, P.S., Bareket, Z. and Johnson, G.E. (1995) 'Automatic target acquisition autonomous Intelligent Cruise Control (AICC): Driver comfort, acceptance, and performance in highway traffic, SP-1088', Human Factors in Vehicle Design: Lighting, Seating and Advanced Electronics, SAE Techn. Paper 950970, pp. 185-1990.
26. Sheridan, T.B. and Verplank, W.L. (1978) Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators, MIT Man-Machine Laboratory, Cambridge, MA.
27. Stanton, N.A. and Young, M.S. (2001) 'A proposed psychological model of driving automation', Theoretical Issues In Ergonomics, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp.315-331.
28. Stanton, N.A. and Young, M.S. (2005) 'Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control', Ergonomics, Vol. 48, No. 10, pp. 1294-1313.
29. Stanton, N.A., Young, M. and McCaulder, B. (1997) 'Drive -by-wire: the case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control', Safety Science, Vol. 27, Nos. 2-3, pp. 149-150.
30. Stewart, R. and Harris, D. (2003) 'Assessing the effects of new technology on driver behaviour- a theoretical model', in Harris, D., Duffy, V., Smith, M. and Stephanidis, C (Eds.): Human - Centred Computing: Cognitive, social and Ergonomics Aspects, ISBN 0805849327, pp.592-596.
31. Wilde, G.J.S. (1982) 'The theory of risk homeostasis: implications for safety and health', Risk Analy., Vol. 2, pp.209-225.
32. Young, M.S. and Stanton, N.A. (1997) 'Automative automation: investigating the impact on drivers' mental workload', International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp.325-336.
33. Young, M.S. and Stanton, N.A. (2001) 'Out of control', New Scientist, Vol. 172, No. 2315, pp.44-47.
34. Young, M.S. and Stanton, N.A. (2005) 'Malleable attentional resources theory: a new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance', Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 44, No. 3, Fall 2002, pp.365-375(11).
35. Young, R.M. (1983) 'Surrogates and mappings: two kinds of conceptual models for interactive devices', in Gentner, D. and Stevens, A.L. (Eds.): Mental Models, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Cambridge, England, pp.35-52.