Abortion politics: Clinical freedom, trust in the judiciary, and the autonomy of women

JAMA

Volumn 298, Issue 13, 2007, Pages 1562-1564

  Gostin, Lawrence O ^a,b  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FREEDOM; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; NOTE; POLITICS; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WOMEN'S HEALTH; ARTICLE; ETHICS; FEMALE; INDUCED ABORTION; LEGAL ASPECT; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; UNITED STATES;

ABORTION, INDUCED; FEMALE; HUMANS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; POLITICS; PREGNANCY; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34948867390     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.13.1562     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. Transcript: day two of the Roberts confirmation hearings. Washington Post. September 13, 2005. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ article/2005/09/13/AR2005091300876.html. Accessed June 27, 2007.
2. US Senate Judiciary Committee Holds a Hearing on Judge Samuel Alito's Nomination to the Supreme Court (Day 2). http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/alitoday2. php. Accessed June 27, 2007.
3. Roe v Wade, 410 US 113 (1973).
4. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey, 505 US 833 (1992).
5. Stenberg v Carhart, 530 US 914 (2000).
6. Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003, 18 USC §1531 (2003).
7. Gonzales v Carhart, 127 S Ct 1610,1620,1622,1624,1633,1638,1639 (2007).
8. Lawrence v Texas, 539 US 558 (2003).
9. Washington v Glucksberg, 521 US 702 (1997).
10. Fried C. Supreme confusion. New York Times. April 26, 2007:A25.
11. Ayotte v Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, 546 US 320 (2006).
12. Planned Parenthood Federation of America v Ashcroft, 320 F Supp 2d 957, 1019 (ND Cal 2004).
13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Statement of Policy, Abortion Policy. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2004.
14. Johnson K. New state push to restrict abortions may follow ruling. New York Times. April 20, 2007:A18.
15. Kaiser Network Daily Reports: Daily Women's Health Policy: April 10, 2007. http://www.kaisernetwork.org/Daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=44136. Accessed June 27, 2007.
16. Charo RA. The partial death of abortion rights. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(21):2125-2128.
17. Siegel RB. The new politics of abortion: an equality analysis of woman-protective abortion restrictions. University of Illinois Law Review, Baum Lecture; 2007:991-1053. Social Science Research Network Web site. http://ssrn.com/abstract=958254. Accessed June 27, 2007.
18. Toner R. Abortion foes see validation for new tactic. New York Times. May 22, 2007:A1.
19. Stotland NL. The myth of the abortion trauma syndrome revisited. JAMA. 1992;268(15):2078-2079.
20. Cohen SA. Abortion and mental health: myths and realities. Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2006;9:8-16.