A cross-cultural validation study of the application of cognitive functions scale: A dynamic assessment procedure, with Dutch first grade students from regular primary schools

Journal of Applied School Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 91-108

  Van Der Aalsvoort, G M ^a   Lidz, Carol S ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Application of Cognitive Functions Scale; Cross cultural; Curriculum based; Dutch primary grade students; Dynamic assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 34948858952     PISSN: 15377903     EISSN: 15377911     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J370v24n01_05     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bensoussan, Y. (2002). The effectiveness of mediation on three subscales of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale, a dynamic assessment procedure for young children. New York: Unpublished master's thesis, Touro College.
2. Brooks, N.D. (1997). An exploratory study into the cognitive modifiability of preschool children using dynamic assessment. Newcastle, United Kingdom: Unpublished master's thesis, University of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne.
3. Ganzeboom, H.B.G., De Graaf, P.M., & Treiman, D.J. (1992). A Standard International Socio-Economic Index of Occupational Status. Social Science Research, 21, 1-56.
4. Kahn, R.J. (2000). Dynamic assessment of infants and toddlers. In C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing Models and Applications (pp. 325-374). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
5. Levy, C. (1999). The discriminant validity of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS): A performance comparison between typically developing and special needs preschool children. New York: Unpublished master's thesis, Touro College.
6. Lidz, C.S. (Ed.). (1987). Dynamic Assessment. An Interactional Approach to Evaluating Learning Potential. New York: The Guilford Press.
7. Lidz, C.S. (2000). The Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS): An example of curriculum-based dynamic assessment. In C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing Models and Applications (pp. 407-439). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
8. Lidz, C. S. (2003). Early Childhood Assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
9. Lidz, C.S. (2004). Successful application of a dynamic assessment procedure with deaf students between the ages of four and eight years. Educational and Child Psychology, 21(1), 59-73.
10. Lidz, C.S. & Elliott, J.G. (Eds.). (2000). Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing Models and Applications. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
11. Lidz, C.S., & Jepsen, R.H. (in press). The Application of Cognitive Functions Scales. In H.C. Haywood & C.S. Lidz. Dynamic Assessment in Practice: Clinical and Educational Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Lidz, C.S. & Van der Aalsvoort, G.M. (2005). Usefulness of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scaleswith young children from the Netherlands. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, 5, 83-99.
13. Malowitsky, M. (2001). Investigation of the effectiveness of the mediation portion of two subscales of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scales, a dynamic assessment procedure for young children. New York: Unpublished master's thesis, Touro College, ED457191.
14. Shurin, R. (1998). Concurrent and discriminant validity of a dynamic assessment procedure with special needs and typical preschool children. New York: Unpublished master's thesis, Touro College, ED435681.
15. Tatik, T. (2000). A concurrent validity study between the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale and the Leiter-Revised International Performance Test. Unpublished master's thesis, Touro College. ED445033.
16. Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic Assessment of Young Children. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
17. Van der Aalsvoort, G.M. & Lidz, C.S. (2002). Reciprocity in dynamic assessment in classrooms: Taking contextual influences into account. In G.M. Van der Aalsvoort, W.C.M. Resing & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning Potential Assessment and Cognitive Training: Actual Research and Perspectives in Theory Building and Methodology (pp. 111-147). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier.
18. Van Kuijk, J.J. (1996). Taal voor kleuters [Language of children in Kindergarten]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Centraal Instituut voor Toetsontwikkeling.
19. Van Kuijk, J.J. (1997). Ordenen [Ordering]. Arnhem: The Netherlands: Centraal Instituut voor Toetsontwikkeling.
20. Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children: Third Edition. (Dutch translation). London: Harcourt.
21. Wells, G. (2002). Responding in Interviews and Tests: Children learning to participate in the activity of evaluation. Human Development, 45 187-193.