Unconscious anchoring in maternal imitation that helps find the correspondence of a caregiver's vowel categories

Advanced Robotics

Volumn 21, Issue 13, 2007, Pages 1583-1600

  Miura, Katsushi ^a   Yoshikawa, Yuichiro ^a   Asada, Minoru ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

DISSIMILAR BODY; MATERNAL IMITATION; UNCONSCIOUS ANCHORING; VOWEL ACQUISITION

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DATA ACQUISITION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; WORD PROCESSING;

DISSIMILAR BODY; MATERNAL IMITATION; UNCONSCIOUS ANCHORING; VOWEL ACQUISITION;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 34948842010     PISSN: 01691864     EISSN: 15685535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156855307782148596     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Reeves, B., and Nass, C., 1996. “ The media equation—how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places ”. In Report, Stanford University Center.
2. Asada, M., MacDorman, K. F., Ishiguro, H., and Kuniyoshi, Y., 2001. Cognitive developmental robotics as a new paradigm for the design of humanoid robots. Robotics Autonomous Syst., 37:185–193.
3. de Boer, B., 2000. Self-organization in vowel systems. J. Phonet., 28:441–465.
4. Oudeyer, P.-Y., 2002. “ Phonemic coding might result from sensory-motor coupling dynamics ”. In Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior 406–416. Edinburgh
5. Fukui, K., Nishikawa, K., Ikeo, S., Shintaku, E., Takada, K., Takanobu, H., Honda, M., and Takanishi, A., 2005. “ Development of a talking robot with vocal cords and lips having humanlike biological structurest ”. In Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2526–2531. Edmonton, Alberta
6. Higashimoto, T., and Sawada, H., 2002. “ Speech production by a mechanical model construction of a vocal tract and its control by neural network ”. In Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation 3858–3863. Washington, DC
7. Yoshikawa, Y., Asada, M., Hosoda, K., and Koga, J., 2003. A constructivist approach to infants' vowel acquisition through mother-infant interaction. Connect. Sci., 15:245–258.
8. Peláez-Nogueras, M., Gewirtz, J. L., and Markham, M. M., 1996. Infant vocalizations are confitioned both by maternal imitation and motherese speech. Infant Behav. Dev., 19:670
9. Masataka, N., and Bloom, K., 1994. Accoustic properties that determine adult's preference for 3-monthold infant vocalization. Infant Behav. Dev., 17:461–464.
10. Potter, R. K., and Steinberg, J. C., 1950. Toward the specification of speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 22:807–820.
11. Rubin, P., and Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., 1998. “ Measuring and modeling speech production ”. In Animal Acoustic Communication, New York:Springer.
12. DeCasper, A. J., and Spence, M. J., 1986. Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns' perception of speech sounds. Infant Behav. Dev., 9:133–150.
13. Kuhl, P. K., 1979. Speech perception in early infancy:perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimilar vowel categories. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 66:1668–1679.
14. McGurk, H., and MacDonald, J., 1976. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 72:746–748.