Belowground competition and the response of developing forest communities to atmospheric CO2 and O3

Global Change Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 2230-2238

  Zak, Donald R ^a   Holmes, William E ^a   Pregitzer, Kurt S ^b   King, John S ^c   Ellsworth, David S ^a   Kubiske, Mark E ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Betula papyrifera; Carbon dioxide; Competition; FACE; Forest; Nitrogen; Nutrient acquisition; Ozone; Populus tremuloides; Species composition

Indexed keywords

BELOWGROUND PRODUCTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMMUNITY RESPONSE; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); FOREST CANOPY; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; GENOTYPE; NET ECOSYSTEM PRODUCTION; NITROGEN; OZONE; SOIL EMISSION; TEMPERATE FOREST; TRACE GAS;

BETULA PAPYRIFERA; POPULUS TREMULOIDES;

EID: 34948840915     PISSN: 13541013     EISSN: 13652486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01436.x     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. 2. New Phytology, 165, 351-372.
2. Burns RM, Honkala BH (1990) Silvics of North America Volume 2: Hardwoods. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook 654, Washington, DC.
3. 2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology. Oecologia, 113, 299-313.
4. 3. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28, 1706-1716.
5. 3 Enrichment (FACE) project: An overview. General Technical Report NC-214, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service North Central Experiment Station, St Paul, MN.
6. Fowler D, Cape JN, Coyle M et al. (1999) The global exposure of forests to air pollutants. Water Air Soil Pollution, 116, 5-32.
7. Fraser EC, Landhäusser, Leiffers VJ (2006) Does mechanical site preparation affect trembling aspen density and growth 9-12 years after treatment? New Forests, 32, 299-306.
8. 3 alter soil nitrogen transformations beneath trembling aspen, paper birch, and sugar maple. Ecosystems, 9, 1354-1363.
9. Isebrands JG, McDonald EP, Kruger E, Hendry G, Percy K, Pregitzer K, Sober J, Karnosky DF (2001) Growth responses of Populus tremuloides clones to interacting elevated carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone. Environmental Pollution, 115, 359-371.
10. 3 - gradient and a FACE experiment. Water Air Soil Pollution, 116, 311-322.
11. Karnosky DF, Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Kubiske ME, Hendry GR, Weinstein D, Nosal M, Percy K (2005) Scaling ozone responses of forest trees to the ecosystem level in a changing climate. Plant Cell and Environment, 28, 965-981.
12. 2. New Phytology, 168, 623-635.
13. 3 concentrations throughout two subsequent growing seasons. Global Change Biology, 11, 1387-1401.
14. 2 and ozone reduce nitrogen acquisition by Pinus halepensis from its mycorrhizal symbiont. Physiologia Plantarum, 111, 305.
15. Liu X, Kozovits AR, Grams TEE, Blaschke H, Rennenbert H, Matyssek R (2004) Competition modifies effects of enhanced ozone/carbon dioxide concentrations on carbohydrate and biomass accumulation in juvenile Norway spruce and European beech. Tree Physiology, 24, 1045-1055.
16. 2 on fine root production and activity in an intact temperate forest ecosystem. Global Change Biology, 6, 967-979.
17. 3 in aggrading aspen stands. Functional Ecology, 16, 792-801.
18. Mulak T, Landhäusser SM, Leiffers VT (2006) Effects of timing of cleaning and residual density on regeneration of juvenile aspen stands. Forest Ecology Management, 232, 198-204.
19. 2 enrichment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 26, 9689-9693.
20. 2: Winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytology, 157, 175-198.
21. 2 and soil nitrogen availability. Tree Physiology, 20, 265-270.
22. Vitousek PM, Howarth RW (1991) Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea - how can it occur. Biogeochemistry, 13, 87-115.
23. 2 concentration. Tree Physiology, 20, 1019-1028.
24. 15N in developing forest ecosystems. Ecology, (in press).
25. 2: Potential causes and consequences. Global Change Biology, 7, 211-222.