Influence of resin composite insertion technique in preparations with a high C-factor

Quintessence International

Volumn 38, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 829-835

  Duarte Jr , Sillas ^a   Dinelli, Welingtom ^b   Carmona Da Silva, Maria Helena ^c  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Adhesion; Adhesive; C factor; Dentin; Enamel; Resin composite

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICON DIOXIDE; SINGLE BOND; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH DISEASE;

BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR, THIRD; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 34948833600     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Imai T, Itoh K, Tani C, et al. Effectiveness of simplified dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater J 1998;17:1-10.
2. Kidd EAM. Microleakage: A review. J Dent 1976;4: 199-206.
3. Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, et al. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 1996;9:167-173.
4. Prati C, Chersoni S, Cretti L, Mongiorgi R. Marginal morphology of class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 1997;10:231-236.
5. Hunter AR, Treasure ET, Hunter AJ. Increases in cavity volume associated with the removal of class II amalgam and composite restorations. Oper Dent 1995;20:2-6.
6. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjor IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48:305-311.
7. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle J. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.
8. Söderholm KJM. Does resin based dentine bonding work? Int Dent J 1995;45:371-381.
9. Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, et al. Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 1996;75:1404-1413.
10. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho R, Sano H, Horner J, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Interfacial morphology and strength of bonds made to superficial versus deep dentin. Am J Dent 1995;8:297-302.
11. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction:The influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996;21:17-24.
12. Swift E Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: A brief history and state of the art.Quintessence Int 1995;26:95-110.
13. Torstenson B, Brännström M. Contraction gap under composite resin restorations: Effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress. Oper Dent 1998;13: 24-31.
14. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-1639.
15. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990;69:1240-1243.
16. Triolo PT, Swift EJ Jr, Barkmeier WW. Shear bond strengths of composite to dentin using six dental adhesive systems. Oper Dent 1995;20:46-50.
17. Hansen EK. Effect of cavity depth and application technique on marginal adaptation of resins in dentin cavities. J Dent Res 1986;65:1319-1321.
18. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996;75: 871-878.
19. Mangum FI Jr, Berry EA, Deschepper E, Rieger MR. Microleakage of incremental versus compression matrix bulk filling of cervical resin composite restorations. Gen Dent 1994;42:304-308.
20. Koran P, Kürschner R. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998;11:17-22.
21. Mixson JM, Eick JD, Moore DL, Tira DE. Effect of two dentin bonding agents on microleakage in two different cavity designs. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67: 441-445.
22. Barnes DM, McDonald NJ, Thompson VP, Blank LW, Shires PJ. Microleakage in facial and lingual class 5 composite restorations: A comparison. Oper Dent 1994;19:133-137.
23. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 1991;7:107-113.
24. Winkler MM, Katona TR, Paydar NH. Finite element stress analysis of three filling techniques for class V light-cured composite restorations. J Dent Res 1996;75:1477-1483.
25. Sá D, Gabrielli F. Estudo da microinfiltração marginal em restauraçoes com amálgama. Efeito de liga, verniz e brunidura. Rev Fac Farm Odontol Ribeirão Preto 1987;16:22-27.
26. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 1999;78:898-905.
27. Armstrong SR, Keller JC, Boyer DB. The influence of water storage and C-factor on dentin-resin composite microtensile bond strength and debond pathway utilizing a filled and unfilled adhesive resin. Dent Mater 2001;17:268-276.
28. Yaman SD, Sahin M, Aydin C. Finite element analysis of strength characteristics of various based restorative materials in class V cavities. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30:630-641.
29. Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. The effect of interfacial failure around a class V composite restoration analysed by the finite element method. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27: 111-116.
30. Katona TR, Winkler MM, Huang J. Stress analysis of a bulk-filled class V chemical-cured dental composite restoration. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;31:445-449.
31. Katona TR, Winkler MM. Stress analysis of a bulk-filled Class V light-cured composite restoration. J Dent Res 1994;73:1470-1477.
32. St-Georges A, Wilder AD Jr, Perdigão J, Swift E Jr. Microleakage of class V composites using different placement and curing techniques: An in vitro study. Am J Dent 2002;15:244-247.
33. Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2. Am J Dent 2002;15:279-289.
34. Uno S, Shrmokobe H. Contraction stress and marginal adaptation of composite restorations in dentinal cavity.Dent Mater J 1994;13:19-24.
35. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-853.
36. Peris AR, Duarte S Jr, Andrade MF. Evaluation of marginal microleakage in class II cavities: Effect of microhybrid, flowable, and compactable resins. Quintessence Int 2003;34:93-98.
37. Bowen RL, Rapson JE, Dickson G. Hardening shrinkage and hygroscopic expansion of composite resins. J Dent Res 1982;61:654-658.
38. Hirasawa T, Hirano S, Hirabayashi S, Harashima I, Aizawa M. Initial dimensional change of composites in dry and wet conditions. J Dent Res 1983;62: 28-31.
39. Segura A, Donly KJ. In vitro posterior composite polymerization recovery following hygroscopic expansion. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:495-499.
40. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: A review. Oper Dent 1997;22: 173-185.