External ventricular drainage response in poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Effect on preoperative grading and prognosis

Neurocritical Care

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 174-180

  Ransom, Evan R ^a   Mocco, J ^a   Komotar, Ricardo J ^a   Sahni, Deshdeepak ^a   Chang, Jennifer ^a   Hahn, David K ^a   Kim, Grace H ^a   Schmidt, J Michael ^a   Sciacca, Robert R ^a   Mayer, Stephan A ^a   Connolly, E Sander ^a  

^a College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Acute hydrocephalus; Aneurysm; External ventricular drainage; Poor grade; Subarachnoid hemorrhage

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANEURYSM; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; SURGICAL DRAINAGE; BRAIN VENTRICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DISABILITY; HOSPITALIZATION; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RECURRENT DISEASE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TIME; WOUND DRAINAGE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CEREBRAL VENTRICLES; COHORT STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DRAINAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; RECURRENCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34948827561     PISSN: 15416933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-007-0019-7     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Becker KJ. Epidemiology and clinical presentation of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1998; 9:435-44.
2. Hanel RA, Xavier AR, Mohammad Y, Kirmani JF, Yahia AM, Qureshi AI. Outcome following intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurol Res 2002; 24(Suppl 1):S58-62.
3. Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1968; 28:14-20.
4. Le Roux PD, Elliott JP, Newell DW, Grady MS, Winn HR. Predicting outcome in poor-grade patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective review of 159 aggressively managed cases. J Neurosurg 1996; 85:39-49.
5. Le Roux PD, Winn HR. Intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage management of the poor grade patient. Acta Neurochir Suppl 1999; 72:7-26.
6. Hutchinson PJ, Power DM, Tripathi P, Kirkpatrick PJ. Outcome from poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage - which poor grade subarachnoid haemorrhage patients benefit from aneurysm clipping? Br J Neurosurg 2000; 14:105-9.
7. Cesarini KG, Hardemark HG, Persson L. Improved survival after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: review of case management during a 12-year period. J Neurosurg 1999; 90:664-72.
8. Chiang VL, Claus EB, Awad IA. Toward more rational prediction of outcome in patients with high-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2000; 46:28-35, (discussion -6).
9. Disney L, Weir B, Grace M. Factors influencing the outcome of aneurysm rupture in poor grade patients: a prospective series. Neurosurgery 1988; 23:1-9.
10. Duong DH, Kolluri VR, Spittaler PJ, Sengupta RP. Risk Score Estimation: a new method to determine optimal timing of aneurysm clipping for improved management outcome. Neurol Res 1998; 20:218-24.
11. Ogilvy CS, Carter BS. A proposed comprehensive grading system to predict outcome for surgical management of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1998; 42:959-68, (discussion 68-70).
12. Demirgil BT, Tugcu B, Postalci L, Guclu G, Dalgic A, Oral Z. Factors leading to hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2003; 46:344-8.
13. Dorai Z, Hynan LS, Kopitnik TA, Samson D. Factors related to hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2003; 52:763-9, (discussion 9-71).
14. Mehta V, Holness RO, Connolly K, Walling S, Hall R. Acute hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Can J Neurol Sci 1996; 23:40-5.
15. Graff-Radford NR, Torner J, Adams HP Jr., Kassell NF. Factors associated with hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage. A report of the Cooperative Aneurysm Study. Arch Neurol 1989; 46:744-52.
16. Sheehan JP, Polin RS, Sheehan JM, Baskaya MK, Kassell NF. Factors associated with hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1999; 45:1120-7, (discussion 7-8).
17. Lin CL, Kwan AL, Howng SL. Acute hydrocephalus and chronic hydrocephalus with the need of postoperative shunting after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 1999; 15:137-45.
18. Vermeij FH, Hasan D, Vermeulen M, Tanghe HL, van Gijn J. Predictive factors for deterioration from hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 1994; 44:1851-5.
19. Menon D, Weir B, Overton T. Ventricular size and cerebral blood flow following subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1981; 5:328-33.
20. Zentner J, Hoffmann C, Schramm J. Results of early surgery in poor-grade aneurysm patients. J Neurosurg Sci 1996; 40:183-8.
21. Suzuki J, Yoshimoto T, Hori S. Continuous ventricular drainage to lessen surgical risk in ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Surg Neurol 1974; 2:87-90.
22. Suzuki M, Otawara Y, Doi M, Ogasawara K, Ogawa A. Neurological grades of patients with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage improve after short-term pretreatment. Neurosurgery 2000; 47:1098-104, (discussion 104-5).
23. Mohr G, Ferguson G, Khan M, Malloy D, Watts R, Benoit B, Weir B. Intraventricular hemorrhage from ruptured aneurysm. Retrospective analysis of 91 cases. J Neurosurg 1983; 58:482-7.
24. Nowak G, Schwachenwald R, Arnold H. Early management in poor grade aneurysm patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1994; 126:33-7.
25. Pare L, Delfino R, Leblanc R. The relationship of ventricular drainage to aneurysmal rebleeding. J Neurosurg 1992; 76:422-7.
26. Steudel WI, Reif J, Voges M. Modulated surgery in the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysm in poor grade patients. Neurol Res 1994; 16:49-53.
27. Rajshekhar V, Harbaugh RE. Results of routine ventriculostomy with external ventricular drainage for acute hydrocephalus following subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1992; 115:8-14.
28. Haley EC Jr., Kassell NF, Torner JC. The International cooperative study on the timing of aneurysm surgery. The north american experience. Stroke 1992; 23:205-14.
29. Miyaoka M, Sato K, Ishii S. A clinical study of the relationship of timing to outcome of surgery for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. A retrospective analysis of 1622 cases. J Neurosurg 1993; 79:373-8.
30. Seifert V, Trost HA, Stolke D. Management morbidity and mortality in grade IV and V patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1990; 103:5-10.
31. Ungersbock K, Bocher-Schwarz H, Ulrich P, Wild A, Perneczky A. Aneurysm surgery of patients in poor grade condition. Indications and experience. Neurol Res 1994; 16:31-4.
32. Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 1980; 6:1-9.
33. van Gijn J, Hijdra A, Wijdicks EF, Vermeulen M, van Crevel H. Acute hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 1985; 63:355-62.
34. Kusske JA, Turner PT, Ojemann GA, Harris AB. Ventriculostomy for the treatment of acute hydrocephalus following subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 1973; 38:591-5.
35. Sasaki T, Sato M, Oinuma M, Sakuma J, Suzuki K, Matsumoto M, et al. Management of poor-grade patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in the acute stage: Importance of close monitoring for neurological grade changes. Surg Neurol 2004; 62:531-5, (discussion 5-7).
36. Kawai K, Nagashima H, Narita K, Nakagomi T, Nakayama H, Tamura A, et al. Efficacy and risk of ventricular drainage in cases of grade V subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurol Res 1997; 19:649-53.
37. Bederson JB, Levy AL, Ding WH, Kahn R, DiPerna CA, Jenkins AL 3rd, et al. Acute vasoconstriction after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1998; 42:352-60, (discussion 60-2).
38. Lang EW, Diehl RR, Mehdorn HM. Cerebral autoregulation testing after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: the phase relationship between arterial blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity. Crit Care Med 2001; 29:158-63.
39. Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Czosnyka Z, Piechnik S, Steiner LA, Schmidt E, et al. Continuous assessment of cerebral autoregulation: clinical and laboratory experience. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2003; 86:581-5.
40. Rosenorn J, Eskesen V, Schmidt K, Ronde F. The risk of rebleeding from ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1987; 67:329-32.
41. McIver JI, Friedman JA, Wijdicks EF, Piepgras DG, Pichelmann MA, Toussaint LG 3rd, et al. Preoperative ventriculostomy and rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2002; 97:1042-4.
42. Roitberg BZ, Khan N, Alp MS, Hersonskey T, Charbel FT, Ausman JI. Bedside external ventricular drain placement for the treatment of acute hydrocephalus. Br J Neurosurg 2001; 15:324-7.
43. Naidech AM, Janjua N, Kreiter KT, Ostapkovich ND, Fitzsimmons BF, Parra A, et al. Predictors and impact of aneurysm rebleeding after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Arch Neurol 2005; 62:410-6.
44. Hutchinson PJ, Seeley HM, Kirkpatrick PJ. Factors implicated in deaths from subarachnoid haemorrhage: are they avoidable? Br J Neurosurg 1998; 12:37-40.
45. Laidlaw JD, Siu KH. Ultra-early surgery for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: outcomes for a consecutive series of 391 patients not selected by grade or age. J Neurosurg 2002; 97:250-8, (discussion 47-9).
46. Laidlaw JD, Siu KH. Poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: outcome after treatment with urgent surgery. Neurosurgery 2003; 53:1275-80, (discussion 80-2).
47. Taylor B, Harries P, Bullock R. Factors affecting outcome after surgery for intracranial aneurysm in Glasgow. Br J Neurosurg 1991; 5:591-600.
48. Lanzino G, Kassell NF, Germanson TP, Kongable GL, Truskowski LL, Torner JC, et al. Age and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: why do older patients fare worse? J Neurosurg 1996; 85:410-8.
49. O'Sullivan MG, Sellar R, Statham PF, Whittle IR. Management of poor grade patients after subarachnoid haemorrhage: the importance of neuroradiological findings on clinical outcome. Br J Neurosurg 1996; 10:445-52.