How people with developmental disabilities navigate the internet

British Journal of Special Education

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 138-142

  Harrysson, B ^a   Svensk, A ^a   Johansson, G I ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Cognitive; Design; Interface; Internet; Learning disabilities; Navigation

Indexed keywords

EID: 34948814329     PISSN: 09523383     EISSN: 14678578     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0952-3383.2004.00344.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Abascal, J. & Nicolle, C. A. (2001) ‘Why inclusive design guidelines?’, in J. Abascal & C. A. Nicolle, (eds) Inclusive Design Guidelines for HCI. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
2. Council of the European Union Commission of the European Communities (2000) ‘Europe 2002, an information society for all. Action Plan prepared by the Council and the European Commission for the Feira European Council, 19–20 June 2000.
3. Eftring, H. (1999) ‘The useworthiness of robots for people with physical disabilities.’Doctoral thesis, Certec, LTH, No. 1:1999, Lund University: Sweden. Also available at: http://www.certec.lth.se/doc/useworthiness/.
4. Engelen, J. (2001) ‘Guidelines for web accessibility’, in J. Abascal & C. A. Nicolle, (eds) Inclusive Design Guidelines for HCI. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
5. Harrysson, B. (2003) ‘Internet enabling design for people with cognitive limitations’, in B. Harrysson, Web Design for Cognitive Accessibility. Licentiate thesis, Division of Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Sweden.
6. Hawthorn, D. (2001) ‘Running software usability studies with older users’, in M. Stevenson & J. Talbot, (eds) Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society of Australia: ‘Better Integration: Bringing Research and Practice Together’, 121–126.
7. Hitchcock, C. (2001) ‘Bobby: a validation tool for disability access on the world wide web’, in J. Abascal & C. A. Nicolle, (eds) Inclusive Design Guidelines for HCI. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
8. Petrie, H. (2001) ‘Accessibility and usability requirements for ICTs for disabled and elderly people: a functional classification approach’, in J. Abascal & C. A. Nicolle, (eds) Inclusive Design Guidelines for HCI. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
9. Poulson, D. & Waddell, N. (2001) ‘Userfit: user centred design in assistive technology’, in J. Abascal & C. A. Nicolle, (eds) Inclusive Design Guidelines for HCI. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
10. Svensk, A. (2001) Design av kognitiv assistans. Licentiate thesis, Certec, LTH, No. 1: 2001, Lund University: Sweden. Available in English as Design for Cognitive Assistance at: http://www.certec.lth.se/doc/designforcognitive/ (23 Feb. 2004).
11. Swedish Handicap Institute (2002) ‘TASC – Telematics Applications Supporting Cognition’, available online at: http://www.hi.se/english/tascx.shtm (23 Feb. 2004).
12. WHO (World Health Organisation) (2001) The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – ICF. Geneva: WHO.
13. W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) (2004) ‘Guidelines’, available online at: http://www.w3c.org/ (23 Feb. 2004).