Quantitative study of new bone formation in distraction osteogenesis of craniofacial bones by bone scintigraphy

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1236-1241

  Rojvachiranonda, Nond ^a,b   Tepmongkol, Supatporn ^a,b   Mahatumarat, Charan ^a,b  

^a CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b KING CHULALONGKORN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Bone scan; Distraction osteogenesis; New bone formation; Osteoblastic activity; Scintigraphy

Indexed keywords

TRACER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE SCINTISCANNING; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; HUMAN; MANDIBLE HYPOPLASIA; MIDFACE HYPOPLASIA; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDARTHROSIS; SKULL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FACIAL BONES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; OSTEOGENESIS; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; PILOT PROJECTS; SKULL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34948813021     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e3180f61198     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, et al. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89:1-8
2. Maull DJ. Review of devices for distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial complex. Semin Orthod 1999;5:64-73
3. Maiocchi AB. Historical review. In: Maiocchi AB, Aronson J, eds. Operative Principles of Ilizarov: Fracture Treatment, Nonunion, Osteomyelitis, Lengthening, Deformity Correction. Milan: New Design PAC, 1991:3-8
4. Katzen JT, Holliday RA, McCarthy JG. Imaging the neonatal mandible for accurate distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 2001;12:26-30
5. Kusnoto B, Figueroa AA, Polley JW. Radiographic evaluation of bone formation in the pterygoid region after maxillary distraction with a rigid external distraction (RED) device. J Craniofac Surg 2001;12:109-117
6. Mahatumarat C, Chokrungvaranont P, Rojvachiranonda N. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in unilateral craniofacial microsomia: preliminary report. J Med Assoc Thai 2001;84:811-820
7. Yu JC, Fearon J, Havlik RJ, et al. Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1E-20E
8. Paccione MF, Mehrara BJ, Warren SM, et al. Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: latency, rate, and rhythm determine the adaptive response. J Craniofac Surg 2001;12:175-182
9. Cope JB, Samchukov ML. Mineralization dynamics of regenerate bone during mandibular osteodistraction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;30:234-242
10. Smith SW, Sachdeva RC, Cope JB. Evaluation of the consolidation period during osteodistraction using computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:254-263
11. Roth DA, Gosain AK, McCarthy JG, et al. A CT scan technique for quantitative volumetric assessment of the mandible after distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:1237-1247
12. Stabin MG. Internal dosimetry in pediatric nuclear medicine. In: Stabin MG, ed. Pediatric Nuclear Medicine. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995:556-581
13. Pylypenko N, Kornyeyeva V, Gur H. Patient doses from computed tomography in the north-east region of Ukraine. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Radiological Protection of Patients in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy, Malaga, Spain, 2001
14. Fang TD, Salim A, Xia W, et al. Angiogenesis is required for successful bone induction during distraction osteogenesis. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:1114-1124
15. Aronson J. Temporal and spatial increases in blood flow during distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;301:124-131
16. Kawano M, Taki J, Tsuchiya H, et al. Predicting the outcome of distraction osteogenesis by 3-phase bone scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 2003;44:369-374