On consistency of the weighted arithmetical mean complex judgement matrix * * This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (70525004; 70471035; 70121001).

Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 515-519

  Yucheng, Dong ^a   Yinfeng, Xu ^a,b   Lili, Ding ^a  

^a XI'AN JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b XI'AN JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

compatibility; consistency; group decision making; judgement matrices; the analytic hierarchy process

Indexed keywords

GROUP DECISION MAKING; JUDGEMENT MATRICES; WEIGHTED ARITHMETICAL MEAN COMPLEX JUDGEMENT MATRIX;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; STATISTICAL METHODS; THRESHOLD LOGIC;

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

EID: 34848887776     PISSN: 10044132     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1004-4132(07)60122-4     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Saaty T. The analytic hierarchy process (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York
2. Vargas L. An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal of Operational Re search 48 (1990) 2-8
3. Aczèl J., and Saaty T. Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 27 1 (1983) 93-102
4. Forman E., and Peniwati K. Aggregating individual judgements and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 108 (1998) 165-169
5. Ramanathan R., and Ganesh L. Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages. European Journal of Operational Research 79 (1994) 249-265
6. Xu Z. On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 126 (2000) 683-687
7. Escobar M., Aguarón J., and Moreno-Jiménez J. A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorization procedure. European Journal of Operational Research 153 (2004) 318-322
8. Saaty T. A ratio scale metric and the compatibility of ratio scales: the possibility of arrow's impossibility theorem. Applied Mathematic Letter 7 6 (1994) 51-57
9. Lootsma F. Performance evaluation of non-linear optimization methods via multi-criteria decision analysis and via linear model analysis. In: Powell M. (Ed). Nolinear Optimization (1981), Academic Press, London 419-458
10. Dong Y., and Chen Y. A method of checking consistency and compatibility of the analytic hierarchy process. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice 24 7 (2004) 105-110 (in Chinese).
11. Wang L., and Xu S. The Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process (1990), Chinese People University Press, Beijing 246-247 (in Chinese).