Phylogenetic relationships of Pseudis and Lysapsus (Anura, Hylidae, Hylinae) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences

Cladistics

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 455-463

  Aguiar Jr , O ^a,d   Bacci Jr , M ^b   Lima, A P ^c   Rossa Feres, D C ^b   Haddad, C F B ^b   Recco Pimentel, S M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^c INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS DA AMAZÔNIA   (Brazil)

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME; FROG; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MITOCHONDRION; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; RNA; SUBSPECIES;

ANURA; HYLIDAE; HYLINAE; LYSAPSUS; LYSAPSUS LIMELLUM; NEOBATRACHIA; PSEUDIS; PSEUDIS MINUTA; PSEUDIS PARADOXA;

EID: 34848880862     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00154.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Barg, M.V., 2003. Osteología y relaciones filogenéticas de los anuros neobatracios del género Pseudis. PhD Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 107pp.
2. Barrio, A., Rubel, D.P., 1970. Caracteristicas del cariotipo de los pseudidos (Amphibia, Anura). Physis 79, 505 510.
3. Bossuyt, F., Milinkovitch, M.C., 2000. Convergent adaptive radiations in Madagascan and Asian ranid frogs reveal covariation between larval and adults traist. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 6585 6590.
4. Boulenger, G.A., 1882. Catalogue of the Batrachia Salientia s. Ecaudata in the Collection of the British Museum, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, London.
5. Braun, P.C., Braun, C.A.S., 1980. Lista prévia dos anfíbios do estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia 56, 121 146.
6. Bremer, K., 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295 304.
7. Burger, W.L., 1954. Two family groups of Neotropical frogs. Herpetologica, 10, 194 196.
8. Busin, C.S., 2005. Estudo citogenético de espécies dos gêneros Pseudis e Lysapsus (Anura, Hylidae). PhD Thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil, 87pp.
9. Busin, C.S., Vinciprova, G., Recco-Pimentel, S.M., 2001. Chromosomal rearrangements as the source of variation in the number of chromosomes in Pseudis (Amphibia, Anura). Genetica 110, 131 141.
10. Busin, C.A., Lima, A.P., Prado, C.P.A., Strüssmann, C., Siqueira Jr, S., Recco-Pimentel, S.M., 2006. Chromosomal differentiation of populations of Lysapsus limellus limellus, L. 1. bolivianus, and of Lysapsus caraya (Hylinae, Hylidae). Micron 37, 355 362.
11. Caramaschi, U., Cruz, C.A.G., 1998. Notas taxonômicas sobre Pseudis fusca German e P. bolbodactyla A. Lutz, com da descrição de uma nova espécie correlata (Anura, Pseudidae). Rev. Bras. Zool. 15, 929 944.
12. Cochran, D.M., Goin, C.J., 1970. Frogs of Colombia. U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 288, XII+655.
13. Darst, C.R., Cannatella, D.C., 2004. Novel relationships among hyloid frogs inferred from 12S and 16S mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31, 462 475.
14. Davis, D.D., 1936. The distribution of Bidder's organ in the Bufonidae. Zool. Ser., Field Mus. Nat. Hist. 20, 115 126.
15. Duellman, W.E., 2001. The Hylid Frogs of Middle America, 2. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Ithaca, NY.
16. Duellman, W.E., de Sá, R.O., 1988. A new genus and species of South American hylid frog with highly modified tadpole. Trop. Zool. 1, 117 136.
17. Faivovich, J., Haddad, C.F.B.H., Garcia, P.C.A., Frost, D.R., Campbell, J.A., Wheeler, W.C., 2005. Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to the Hylinae: phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 294, 1 244.
18. Farris, J.S., Källerjö, M., Kluge, A.G., Bult, C., 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10, 315 319.
19. Feller, A., Hedges, S.B., 1998. Molecular evolution of the early history of living amphibians. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9, 509 516.
20. Felsenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783 791.
21. Frost, D.R., 2006. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. V4.0. Available at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html.
22. Frost, D.R., Grant, T., Faivovich, J., Bain, R.H., Hass, A., Haddad, C.F.B., de Sá, R.O., Channing, A., Wilkinson, M., Donnellan, S.C., Raxworthy, C.J., Campbell, J.A., Blotto, B.L., Moler, P., Drewes, R.C., Nussbaum, R.A., Lynch, J.D., Green, D.M., Wheeler, W.C., 2006. The amphibian tree of life. Bull. Am. Mus. Natl Hist. 297, 1 370.
23. Gallardo, J.M., 1961. On the species of Pseudidae (Amphibia, Anura). Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 125, 111 134.
24. Gallardo, J.M., 1964. Una nueva forma de Pseudidae (Amphibia, Anura) y algunas consideraciones sobre las especies argentinas de esta familia. Acta Zool. Lilloana 20, 193 209.
25. Garda, A.A., Costa, G.C., Colli, G.R., Báo, S.N., 2004. Spermatozoa of Pseudinae (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae), with a test of the hypothesis that sperm ultrastructure correlates with reproductive modes in anurans. J. Morphol. 261, 196 205.
26. Goebel, A.M., Donnelly, J.M., Atz, M.E., 1999. PCR primer and amplification methods for 12S ribosomal DNA, the control region, cytochrome oxidase I, and cytochrome b in bufonids and other frogs, and an overview of PCR primer which have amplified DNA in amphibians successfully. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11, 163 199.
27. Graybeal, A., 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of bufonid frogs and tests alternate macroevolutionary hypotheses characterizing their radiation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 119, 297 338.
28. Hall, T.A., 1999. Bio Edit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser. 41, 95 98.
29. Hass, A., 2003. Phylogeny of frogs as inferred from primarily larval characters (Amphibia, Anura). Cladistics 19, 23 89.
30. Hay, J.M., Ruvinsky, I., Hedges, B., Maxson, L.R., 1995. Phylogenetic relationships of amphibian families inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 928 937.
31. Hedges, S.B., 1994. Molecular evidence for the origin of birds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 2621 2624.
32. King, M., 1991. The evolution of the heterochromatin in the amphibian genome. In: Green, D.M., Sessions, S.K. (Eds Amphibian Cytogenetics and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 369 391.
33. Klappenbach, M.A., 1985. Notas herpetologicas, V. Mus. Hist. Nat. Montevideo 150, 1 23.
34. Kocher, T.D., Thomas, W.K., Meyer, A., Edwards, S.V., Päbo, S., Villablanca, F.X., Wilson, A.C., 1989. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 6196 6200.
35. Kwet, A., 2000. The genus Pseudis (Anura: Pseudidae) in Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil, with description of a new species. Amphibia-Reptilia 21, 39 55.
36. Moritz, C., Schneider, C.J., Wake, D.B., 1992. Evolutionary relationships within the Esantina eschscholtzii complex confirm the ring species interpretation. Syst. Biol. 41, 273 291.
37. Müller, K., 2004. PRAP - Computation of Bremer support for large data sets. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31, 780 782.
38. Müller, J., Müller, K., 2004. TreeGraph: automated drawing of complex tree figures using an extensible tree description format. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4, 786 788.
39. Nixon, K.C., 1999. The parsimony ratched, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15, 407 414.
40. Noble, G.K., 1931. The Biology of the Amphibia. McGraw-Hill, New York.
41. Palumbi, S.R., Martin, A., McMillan, L., Grabowski, G., 1991. The Simple Fool's Guide to PCR, Version 2.0. Privately published document compiled by S. Palumbi.
42. Parker, H.W., 1935. The frogs, lizards, and snakes of British Guiana. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 34, 505 530.
43. Ruvinsky, I., Maxson, L.R., 1996. Phylogenetic relationships among bufonoid frogs (Anura: Neobatrachia) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5, 533 547.
44. Savage, J.M., Carvalho, A., 1953. L. The family position of Neotropical frogs currently referred to the genus Pseudis. Zoologica 38, 193 200.
45. Swofford, D.L., 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
46. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., Gibson, T.J., 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673 4680.
47. Titus, T.A., Larson, A., 1996. Molecular phylogenetics of desmognathine salamanders (Caudata: Plethosdontidae): a reevaluation of evolution in ecology, life hystory, and morphology. Syst. Biol. 45, 229 238.
48. Vences, M., Kosuch, J., Boistel, R., Haddad, C.F.B., La Marca, H., Lötters, Veith, M., 2003. Convergent evolution of aposematica coloration in Neotropical poison frogs: a molecular phylogenetic perpective. Org. Divers. Evol. 3, 215 226.