Performance-based optimization considering both structural and nonstructural components

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 685-709

  Rojas, Hugo A ^a   Pezeshk, Shahram ^a   Foley, Christopher M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^b MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; HAZARDS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY;

GROUND MOTION; PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

BUILDING; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GROUND MOTION; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 34848880035     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.2754002     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. AISC, 2005. Load and Resistance Factor Specifications for the Design of Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, III.
2. Algan, B., 1982. Drift and Damage Considerations in Earthquake Resistant Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
3. Alimoradi, A., 2004. Probabilistic Performance-Based Seismic Design Automation of Nonlinear Steel Structures Using Genetic Algorithms, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Memphis, Tenn.
4. Alimoradi, A., and Ahmadi, G., 2002. Sensitivity analysis of a GA-based active/hybrid control system under near-source strong ground motion, 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering (7NCEE), Boston, Mass.
5. Alimoradi, A., Pezeshk, S., and Foley, C. M., 2004. Automated Performance-Based Design of Steel Frames, ASCE Structures Congress and Exposition, Nashville, Tenn. [CD-ROM].
6. Alimoradi, A., Pezeshk, S., and Foley, C. M., 2007. Probabilistic performance-based optimal design of steel moment-resisting frames: part II - applications, J. Struct. Eng. 133, 767-776.
7. ATC, 1996. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Concrete Buildings: Volumes 1 and 2, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, Calif.
8. Carroll, D. L., 2004. FORTRAN Genetic Algorithm Driver, CU Aerospace, Champaign, III. (available at: http://cuaerospace.com/carroll/ ga.html).
9. Comerio, M. C., Stallmeyer, J. C., Holmes, W. T., Morris, P., and Lau, S., 2002. Nonstructural Loss Estimation: The UC Berkeley Case Study, PEER Report 2001/01, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, Calif
10. FEMA, 2000. FEMA-350: Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
11. FEMA, 2003. Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology Earthquake Model: HAZUS-MH MR1, Department of Homeland Security Emergency Preparedness Response Directorate, Washington, D.C.
12. Filiatrault, A., Christopoulos, C., and Stearns, C., 2002. Guidelines, Specifications, and Seismic Performance Characterization of Nonstructural Building Components and Equipment, PEER Report 2002 /05, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, Calif.
13. Foley, C. M., 2002. Optimized performance-based design for buildings, in Recent Advances in Optimal Structural Design, edited by S. A. Burns, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 169-240.
14. Foley, C. M., Alimoradi, A., and Pezeshk, S., 2007. Probabilistic performance-based optimal design of steel moment-resisting frames: part 1, J. Struct. Eng. 133, 757-766.
15. Foley, C. M., and Schinler, D., 2001. Optimized design of steel frames using distributed plasticity, in 2001 Structures Congress, edited by P. Chang, American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington, D.C. [CD-ROM].
16. Foley, C. M., and Schinler, D., 2003. Automated design of steel frames using advanced analysis and object-oriented evolutionary computation, J. Struct. Eng. 129, 648-660.
17. Foley, C. M., Schinler, D., and Voss, M. S., 2002. Optimized Design of Fully and Partially Restrained Steel Frames Using Advanced Analysis and Object-Oriented Evolutionary Computation, Technical report submitted to the National Science Foundation, Award Number CMS-9813216.
18. Fragiadakis, M., Lagaros, N. D., and Papadrakakis, M., 2006. Performance-based multiobjective optimum design of steel structures considering life-cycle cost, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 32, 1-11.
19. Golberg, D. E., 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Boston, Mass.
20. Holmes, W. T., and Comerio, M. C., 2003. Implementation Manual for the Seismic Protection of Laboratory Contents: Format and Case Studies, PEER Report 2003/12, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, Berkeley, Calif.
21. Jalayer, F., and Cornell, C. A., 2003. A Technical Framework for Probability-Based Demand and Capacity Factor (DCFD) Seismic Formats, PEER Report 2003/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, Calif.
22. Kim, Y., and Ghaboussi, J., 1999. A new method of reduced-order feedback control using genetic algorithms, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28, 235-254.
23. Liu, M., 2004. Development of Multiobjective Optimization Procedures for Seismic Design of Steel Moment Frame Structures, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
24. Liu, M., Burns, S. A., and Wen, Y. K., 2003. Optimal seismic design of steel frame buildings based on life-cycle cost considerations, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32, 1313-1332
25. Liu, M., Burns, S. A., and Wen, Y. K., 2004. Life cycle cost oriented seismic design optimization of steel moment frame structures with risk taking preference, Eng. Struct. 26, 1407-1421.
26. Liu, M., Burns, S. A., and Wen, Y. K., 2005. Multiobjective optimization for performance-based seismic design of steel moment frame structures, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34, 289-306.
27. Liu, M., Burns, S. A., and Wen, Y. K., 2006. Genetic algorithm based construction-conscious minimum weight design of seismic steel moment-resisting frames, J. Struct. Eng. 132, 50-58.
28. Naeim, F., Alimoradi, A., and Pezeshk, S., 2004. Selection and scaling of ground motion time histories for structural design using genetic algorithms, Earthquake Spectra 20, 413-426.
29. Pezeshk, S., Camp, C. V., and Chen, D., 1997. Optimal design of 2D frames using a genetic algorithm, Optimal Performance of Civil Infrastructure Systems at Structures Congress XV, Portland, OR, 155-168.
30. Pezeshk, S., Camp, C. V., and Chen, D., 2000. Design of framed structures using genetic optimization, J. Struct. Eng. 126, 382-388.
31. Powell, G. H., 1993. DRAIN-2DX Element Description and User Guide for Element Type01, Type02, Type04, Type06, Type09, and Type15: Version 1.10, UCB/SEMM-93/18, University of California, Berkeley.
32. Prakash, V., Powell, G. H., and Campbell, S., 1993. DRAIN-2DX Base Program Description and User Guide, Version 1.10, Report No. UCB/SEMM-93/ 17-18, University of California, Berkeley.
33. Schinler, D., and Foley, C. M., 2001. An object-oriented evolutionary algorithm for advanced analysis-based design, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), edited by S. A. Burns, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif., 73-78.
34. Somerville, P., Smith, N. F., Punyamurthula, S., and Sun, J., 1997. Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA /SAC Steel Project, Report No. SAC/BD-97-04, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, Calif.
35. Taghavi, S., and Miranda, E., 2003. Response Assessment of Nonstructural Building Elements, PEER Report 2003/05, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, Calif.
36. Voss, M. S., and Foley, C. M., 1999. Evolutionary algorithm for structural optimization, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), edited by W. Banzhaf, J. Daida, A. E. Eiben, M. H. Garzon, V. Honavar, M. Jakiela, and R. E. Smith, Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, Calif, 678-685.