Comparison of conventional and digital radiography for radiometric differentiation of dental cements

Quintessence International

Volumn 38, Issue 9, 2007, Pages e532-e536

  Baksi, B Güniz ^a   Ermis, R Banu ^b  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Computer assisted densitometry; Dental cements; Dental radiography

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; TOOTH CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTIN; DENTURE; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RADIODENSITOMETRY; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CONTRAST MEDIA; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN; DENTURE BASES; DENTURE LINERS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 34848865294     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Skartveit L, Halse A. Radiopacity of glass ionomer materials. J Oral Rehabil 1996; 23: 1-4.
2. Omar OE, Wilson NHF, Watts DC. Radiopacity of posterior composites. J Dent 1986; 14: 178-179.
3. Akerboom HBM, Kreulen CM, van Amerongen WE, Mol A. Radiopacity of posterior composite resins, composite resin luting cements, and glass ionomer lining cements. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70: 351-355.
4. Van Dijken JWV, Wing KR, Ruyter IE. An evaluation of the radiopacity of composite restorative materials used in Class I and Class II cavities. Acta Odontol Scand 1989; 47: 401-407.
5. Goshima T, Goshima Y. Optimum radiopacity of composite inlay materials and cements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 72: 257-260.
6. Prévost AP, Forest D, Tanguay R, DeGrandmont P. Radiopacity of glass ionomer dental materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 70: 231-235.
7. Shah PMM, Chong BS, Sidhu SK, Pitt Ford TR. Radiopacity of potential root-end filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1996; 81: 476-479.
8. Sidhu SK, Shah PMM, Chong BS, Pitt Ford TR. Radiopacity of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 639-643.
9. Brägger U, Pasquali L, Rylander H, Carnes D, Kornman KS. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis in periodontal radiography: A methodological study. J Clin Periodontol 1988; 15: 27-37.
10. Schmidlin PR, Teppers A, Scriba H, Lutz F. In vitro assessment of incipient approximal carious lesions using computer-assisted densitometric image analysis. J Dent 2002; 30: 305-311.
11. Gürdal P, Akdeniz BG. Comparison of two methods for radiometric evaluation of resin-based restorative materials. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27: 236-239.
12. Murchinson DF, Charlton DG, Moore WS. Comparative radiopacity of flowable resin composites. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 179-184.
13. Wenzel A, Hintze H, Hørsted-Bindslev P. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radio-graphs and digital images. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1998; 16: 8-13.
14. Farman TT, Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Golsmith LJ. Optical densities of dental resin composites: A comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film. Gen Dent 1996; 44: 532-537.
15. Smith DC, Ruse DN, Zuccolin D. Some characteristics of glass ionomer cement lining materials. J Can Dent Assoc 1988; 54: 903-908.
16. Williams JA, Billington RW. The radiopacity of glass ionomer dental materials. J Oral Rehabil 1990; 17: 245-248.
17. Gröndahl H-G. Digital radiology in dental diagnosis: A critical review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992; 21: 198-202.