A comparison and cost-effectiveness analysis of peripheral catheter dressings

Ostomy Wound Management

Volumn 53, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 26-33

  Salles, Fernanda Torquato ^b   De Gouveia Santos, Vera Lucia Conceicao ^a   Secoli, Silvia Regina ^b   Aron, Suzana ^b   Del Debbio, Carolina Beltrame ^b   Baptista, Cleide C M ^b   Rogenski, Noemi Marisa Brunet ^b  

^a Cerqueira Cesar   (Brazil)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cost effectiveness; Dressing; Peripheral catheter; Pharmaco economics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BANDAGE; BRAZIL; CATHETERIZATION; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDWELLING CATHETER; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; NURSING; OCCLUSIVE DRESSING; PHARMACOECONOMICS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SKIN CARE; STANDARD; SURGICAL TAPE; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

BANDAGES; BRAZIL; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS, PHARMACEUTICAL; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCLUSIVE DRESSINGS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SKIN CARE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGICAL TAPE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34848856405     PISSN: 08895899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Drummond MF, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programs, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press;1997:97-138.
2. Jolicoeur LM, Jones-Grizzle AJ, Boyer JG. Guidelines for performing a pharmacoeconomic analysis. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992;49(7): 1741-1747.
3. Sacristán Del Castilho JA. Farmacoeconomía y evaluación económica de medicamentos. Introducción. In: Sacristán Del Castilho JA, Llach XB. Farmacoeconomía: Evaluación Económica de Medicamentos. Madrid, Spain: Ed Medica S. A.;1995;19-29.
4. Secoli SR, Padilha KG, Litvoc J, Maeda ST. Farmacoeconomía: perspectiva emergente no processo de tomada de decisão. Ciência & Sa-de Coletiva. 2005;10(suppl):287-296.
5. Campbell K, Woodbury MG, Whittle H, Labate T, Hoskin A. A clinical evaluation of 3M™ no sting barrier film. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000;46(1):2430.
6. Sibbald RG, Torrance GW, Walker V, Attard C, MacNeil P. Cost-effectiveness of Apligraf™ in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2001;47(8):36-46.
7. Kuflik A, Stillo JV, Sanders D, Roland K, Sweeney T, Lemke PM. Petrolatum versus Resurfix® ointment in the treatment of pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2001;47 (2):52-56.
8. Pompeo MQ. The role of "wound burden" in determining the costs associated with wound care. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2001;47(3):65-71.
9. Madeo M, Martin C, Nobbs A. A randomized study comparing IV 3000 (transparent Polyurethane dressing) to a dry gauze dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter sites. J Intraven Nurs. 1997;20(5):253256.
10. Little K, Palmer D. Central line exit sites: which dressing? Nurs Stand. 1998;12(48):42-44.
11. Tripepi-Bova KA, Woodos KD, Loach MC. A comparison of transparent polyurethane and dry gauze dressings for peripheral IV catheter sites: rates of phlebitis, infiltration, and dislodgment by patients. Am J CritCare. 1997;6(5):377381.
12. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, et al. Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. MMWR 2002; 51 (No RR-10). Available at: www.cdc. gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ rr5110al.htm. Accessed October 1, 2003.
13. Lau CE. Transparent and gauze dressings and their effect on infection rates of central venous catheters: a review of past and current literature. J Intraven Nurs. 1996;19(5):240245.
14. Treston-Aurand J, Olmsted RN, Allen-Birdson K, Craig CP. Impact of dressing materials on central venous catheter infection rates. J Intraven Nurs. 1997;20 (4):201-206.
15. Maki DG, Stolz SS, Wheeler S, Mermel LA. A prospective, randomized trial of gauze and two polyurethane dressings for site care of pulmonary artery catheters: implications for catheter management. Crit Care Med. 1994;22(11):1729-1737.