Modelling sulphur emissions in Europe: A spatial econometric approach

Oxford Economic Papers

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 726-743

  Maddison, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMETRICS; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; INCOME; MODELING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SULFUR;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 34848850863     PISSN: 00307653     EISSN: 14643812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oep/gpm005     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Anderson, J. and van Wincoop, E. (2004) Trade costs, Journal of Economic Literature, XLII, 691-751.
2. Anselin, L. (2002) Under the hood issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models, Agricultural Economics 27, 247-67.
3. Anselin, L. (2003) Spatial externalities spatial multipliers and spatial econometrics, International Regional Science Review, 26 153-66.
4. Anselin, L. and Griffith, D. (1988) Do spatial effects really matter in regression analysis? Papers of the Regional Science Association, 65, 11-34.
5. Anselin, L. and Florax, R. (1995) New Directions in Spatial Econometrics, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
6. Ansuategi, A. (2003) Economic growth and transboundary pollution in Europe: An empirical analysis, Environmental and Resource Economics, 26, 305-28.
7. Antweiler, W., Copeland, B., and Taylor, M. (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic Review, 91, 877-908.
8. ApSimon, H., Pearce, D. and Ozdemiroglu, E. (1997) Acid Rain in Europe Counting the Cost, Earthscan, London.
9. Barrett, S. (1994) Self enforcing environmental agreements, Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 878-94.
10. Beckerman, W. (1992) Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? whose environment? World Development, 20, 481-96.
11. Berkhout, F., Boehmer, S., and Skea, J. (1989) Deposits and repositories: Electricity wastes in the UK and West Germany, Energy Policy, April, 105-119.
12. de Bruyn, S. (1997) Explaining the environmental Kuznets curve: structural change and international agreements in reducing sulphur emissions, Environment and Development Economics, 2, 485-503.
13. Cressie, N. (1993) Statistics for Spatial Data, Wiley, New York.
14. Cole, M. (2003) Development, trade and the environment: How robust is the environmental Kuznets curve? Environment and Development Economics, 8, 557-80.
15. Cole, M., Rayner, A., and Bates, J. (1997) The environmental Kuznets curve: An empirical analysis, Environment and Development Economics, 109, 755-87.
16. Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H., and Wheeler, D. (2002) Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 147-68.
17. Dinda, S. (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey, Ecological Economics, 49, 431-55.
18. Driscoll, J. and Kraay, A. (1998) Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 549-60.
19. Dubin, R. (1998) Spatial autocorrelation: A primer, Journal of Housing Economics, 7, 304-27.
20. Elhorst, J. (2003) Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models, International Regional Science Review, 26, 244-68.
21. Florax, R. and Van der Vlist, A. (2003) Spatial econometric data analysis: Moving beyond the traditional models, International Regional Science Review, 26, 223-43.
22. Frank, D., Hironaka, A., and Schofer, E. (2000) The nation state and the natural environment, 1900-1995. American Sociological Review 65, 96-116.
23. Fredriksson, P. and Millimet, D. (2002) Strategic interaction and the determination of environmental policy across US states, Journal of Urban Economics, 51, 101-22.
24. Gleditsch, K. and Ward, M. (2001) Measuring space: A minimum distance database, Journal of Peace Research, 38, 749-68.
25. Halkos, G. (2003) Environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur: Evidence using GMM estimation and random coefficient panel data models, Environment and Development Economics, 8, 581-601.
26. Hedges, L. and Olkin, I. (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
27. Helm, D. (2003) Energy, the State and the Market: British Energy Policy since 1979, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
28. Heston, A., Summers, R., and Aten, B. (2002) Penn World Table Version 6.1, Center for International Comparisons, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
29. Im, K., Pesaran, M., and Shin, Y. (1997) Testing for unit roots in heterogenous panels, Working Paper No. 9526, Department of Economics, University of Cambridge.
30. Keller, W. (2004) International technology diffusion, Journal of Economic Literature, XLII, 752-82.
31. Lefohn, A., Husar, J., and Husar, R. (1999) Estimating historical anthropogenic global sulfur emission patterns for the period 1850-1990, Atmospheric Environment, 33, 3435-44.
32. LeSage, J. (1997) Regression analysis of spatial data, Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 27, 83-94.
33. Letchumanan, R. and Kodama, F. (2000) Reconciling the conflict between the 'pollution haven' hypothesis and an emerging trajectory of international technology transfer, Research Policy, 29, 59-79.
34. List, A. and Gallet, C. (1999) The environmental Kuznets curve: does one size fit all? Ecological Economics, 31, 409-24.
35. McGarvey, M. and Walker, M. (2003) An alternative estimator for fixed effects spatial models, Urban and Regional Analysis Group Working Paper No. 03-03, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
36. Maler, K.-G. (1990a) International environmental problems, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 6, 80-108.
37. Maler, K.-G. (1990b) The cost effectiveness of different solutions to the European sulphur problem, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 17, 153-66.
38. Murdoch, J. Sandler, T., and Sargent, K. (1997) A tale of two collectives: Sulphur versus nitrogen oxide emission reduction in Europe, Economica, 64, 281-301.
39. Newbery, D. (1990) Acid rain, Discussion Paper No. 442, Centre for Economic Policy Research: London.
40. Panayotou, T. (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development, Working paper WP238, Laternational Labour Office, Geneva.
41. Perman, R., Ma, Y., and McGilvray, J. (1996) Natural Resource and Environmental Economics, Longman, London.
42. Perman, R. and Stern, D. (2003) Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47 325-47.
43. Pope, C., Thun, M., Namboodiri, M., Dockery, D., Evans, J., Speizer, F., and Heath, C. (1995) Particulate air pollution as a predictor of mortality in a prospective study of US adults, American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, 151, 669-74.
44. Rothman, D. (1998) Environmental Kuznets curves - real progress or passing over the buck? Ecological Economics, 25, 177-94.
45. Selden, T. and Song, D. (1994) Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 147-62.
46. Sigman, H. (2002) International spillovers and water quality in rivers: Do countries free ride? American Economic Review, 92 1152-9.
47. Stern, D. (1998) Progress on the environmental Kuznets curve? Environment and Development Economics, 3, 175-98.
48. Stern, D. (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve, World Development, 32, 1419-39.
49. Stern, D. and Common, M. (2001) Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41, 162-78.
50. Stern, D., Common, M., and Barbier, E. (1996) Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development, World Development, 24, 1151-60.
51. Stern, D. and Kaufman, R. (2000) Detecting a global warming signal in hemispheric temperature series: A structural time series analysis, Climatic Change, 47, 411-38.
52. White, E. and Hewings, G. (1982) Space-time employment modelling: some results using seemingly unrelated regression estimators, Journal of Regional Science, 22, 283-302.