Stimulation of osteoblast growth by an electromagnetic field in a model of bone-like construct

European Journal of Histochemistry

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 199-203

  Icaro Cornaglia, Antonia ^a   Casasco, M ^a   Riva, F ^a   Farina, A ^a   Fassina, L ^a   Visai, L ^a   Casasco, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bioreactor; Bone like tissue; Electromagnetic field; Histochemistry; Osteoblast; SAOS 2 cells; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOPONTIN; POLYURETHAN;

ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CELL CULTURE; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROPHOBICITY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOREACTIVITY; IN VITRO STUDY; MORPHOMETRICS; OSTEOBLAST; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; ANIMAL; BONE MINERALIZATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CYTOLOGY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; METABOLISM; OSTEOSARCOMA; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BIOREACTORS; CALCIFICATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL PROLIFERATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMANS; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; OSTEOSARCOMA;

EID: 34848850654     PISSN: 1121760X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bloom W and Fawcett DW. A textbook of Histology. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1994.
2. Bonucci E. Calcified tissue histochemistry: from microstructures to nanoparticles. Eur J Histochem 2005; vol. 49:1-10.
3. Burger EH, Klein-Nulend J. Mechanotransduction in bone-role of the lacuno-canalicular network. FASEB J 1999; Suppl. 101, 12.
4. Cane V, Botti P, Soana S. Pulsed magnetic fields improve osteoblast activity during the repair of an experimental osseous defect. J Orthop Res 1993;11: 64-70.
5. Ciombor DM, Aaron RK. Influence of electromagnetic fields on endochondral bone formation. J Cell Biochem 1993; 52:37-41.
6. Diniz P, Shomura K, Soejima K, Ito G. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation on bone tissue like formation are dependent on the maturation stages of the osteoblasts. Bioelectromagnetics 2002; 23: 398-405.
7. Fassina L, Visai L, Asti L, Benazzo F, Speziale P, Tanzi MC, et al. Calcified matrix production by SAOS-2 cells inside a polyurethane porous scaffold, using a perfusion bioreactor. Tissue Eng 2005; 11: 685-700
8. Fassina L, Visai L, Benazzo F, Benedetti L, Calligaro A, Cusella De Angelis G, et al. Effects of electromagnetic stimulation on calcified matrix production by SAOS-2 cells over a polyurethane porous scaffold. Tissue Eng 2006 (in press).
9. Fisher LW, Stubbs JT, Young MF. Antisera and cDNA probes to human certain animal model bone matrix noncollagenous proteins. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; Suppl. 266, 61-5.
10. Fitzsimmons RJ, Ryaby JT, Magee FP, Baylink DJ. Combined magnetic fields increased net calcium flux in bone cells. Calcif Tissue Int 1994; 55: 376-80.
11. Hsu SM, Raine L, Fanger H. Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures. J Histochem Cytochem 1981; 29: 577.
12. Ingber DE. Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. Ann Rev Physiol 1997; 59: 575-99.
13. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Ijiri K. Osteogenesis by pulsing electromagnetic fields (PEMFs): optimum stimulation setting. In Vivo 1996 10: 351-6.
14. Otter MW, McLeod KJ, Rubin CT. Effects of electromagnetic fields in experimental fracture repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; Suppl.90.
15. Pagliara P, Lanubile R, Dwikat M, Abbro L, Dini L. Differentiation of monocytic U937 cells under static magnetic field exposure. Eur J Histochem. 2005; 49:75-86.
16. Pavalko FM, Norvell SM, Burr DB, Turner CH, Duncan RL, Bidwell JP. A model for mechanotransduction in bone cells: the load-bearing mechanosomes. J Cell Biochem 2003; 88: 104-12.
17. Zdrahala RJ, Zdrahala IJ. Biomedical application of polyurethanes: a review of past promises, present realities, and a vibrant future. J Biomater Appl 1999; 14: 67-90.