Pathological classification of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast correlates with surgical treatment and may be predicted by mammography

Breast

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 495-502

  Ponzone, Riccardo ^a   Dominguez, Annelis ^a   Marra, Vincenzo ^b   Pisacane, Alberto ^b   Maggiorotto, Furio ^a   Jacomuzzi, Maria Elena ^a   Magistris, Alessandra ^a   Biglia, Nicoletta ^a   Sismondi, Piero ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b CANDIOLO CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Breast; Calcifications; Cancer; In situ; Mammography; Mastectomy; Pathology; Surgery; Wide local excision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; CANCER STAGING; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34848833198     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Schwartz G.F., Solin L.J., Olivotto I.A., et al. The consensus conference on the treatment of in situ ductal carcinoma of the breast. Hum Pathol 31 (2000) 131-139
2. Silverstein M.J., Poller D.N., Waisman J.R., et al. Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Lancet 345 (1995) 1154-1157
3. Kerlikowske K., Molinaro A., Cha I., et al. Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 95 (2003) 1692-1702
4. Burstein H.J., Polyak K., Wong J.S., et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 1430-1441
5. Elston C.W., Sloane J.P., Amendoeira I., et al. Causes of inconsistency in diagnosing and classifying intraductal proliferations of the breast. European Commission Working Group on Breast Screening Pathology. Eur J Cancer 36 (2000) 1769-1772
6. Holland R., and Hendriks J.H.C.L. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation. Semin Diagn Pathol 11 (1994) 181-192
7. Stomper P.C., and Connolly J.L. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumour subtype. AJR 159 (1992) 483-485
8. Holland R., Peterse J.L., Millis R.R., et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal for a new classification. Semin Diagn Pathol 11 (1994) 167-180
9. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P, editors. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital tract. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003.
10. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 3rd ed. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology; 1998.
11. Le Gal M., Chavanne G., and Pellier D. Diagnostic value of clustered microcalcifications discovered by mammography (apropos of 227 cases with histological verification and without a palpable breast tumor). Bull Cancer 71 (1984) 57-64
12. European Commission. In: de Wolf CJM, Perry NM, editors. European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. 2nd ed. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 1996.
13. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, EORTC Radiotherapy Group, Bijker N., Meijnen P., Peterse J.L., et al. Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma-in-situ: ten-year results of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized phase III trial 10 853-a study by the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. J Clin Oncol 24 (2006) 3381-3387
14. Barreau B., de Mascarel I., Feuga C., et al. Mammography of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: review of 909 cases with radiographic-pathologic correlations. Eur J Radiol 54 (2005) 55-61
15. Chadwick D.R., and Shorthouse A.J. Wire-directed localization biopsy of the breast: an audit of results and analysis of factors influencing therapeutic value in the treatment of breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 23 (1997) 128-133
16. Kerlikowske K., Molinaro A., Cha I., et al. Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 95 (2003) 1692-1702
17. Harris E.E., Schultz D.J., Jones H.A., and Solin L.J. Factors associated with residual disease on re-excision in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer J 9 (2003) 42-48
18. Dillon M.F., Quinn C.M., McDermott E.W., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of core biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ and its implications for surgical practice. J Clin Pathol 59 (2006) 740-743
19. Evans A., Pinder S., Ellis I., et al. Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features with pathologic correlation. Radiology 191 (1994) 237-240
20. Parker J., Dance D.R., Davies D.H., Yeoman L.J., et al. Classification of ductal carcinoma in situ by image analysis of calcifications from digital mammograms. Br J Radiol 68 (1995) 150-159
21. Hermann G., Keller R., Drossman S., et al. Mammographic pattern of microcalcifications in the preoperative diagnosis of comedo ductal carcinoma in situ: histopathologic correlation. Can Assoc Radiol J 50 (1999) 235-240
22. Dinkel H., Gassel A., and Tschammler A. Is the appearance of microcalcifications on mammography useful in predicting histological grade of malignancy in ductal cancer in situ. Br J Radiol 73 (2000) 938-944
23. Slanetz P.J., Giardino A.A., Oyama T., et al. Mammographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ does not reliably predict histologic subtype. Breast J 7 (2001) 417-421
24. De Roos M.A., Pijnappel R.M., Post W.J., et al. Correlation between imaging and pathology in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. World J Surg Oncol 2 (2004) 4-11
25. Lyman G.H., Giuliano A.E., Somerfield M.R., et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23 (2005) 7703-7720
26. Veronesi P., Intra M., Vento A.R., et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for localised ductal carcinoma in situ?. Breast 14 (2005) 520-522
27. Wilkie C., White L., Dupont E., Cantor A., and Cox C.E. An update of sentinel node mapping in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. AMJ Surg 190 (2005) 563-566
28. Bleiweiss I.J., Nagi C.S., and Jaffer S. Axillary sentinel lymph nodes can be falsely positive due to iatrogenic displacement and transport of benign epithelial cells in patients with breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 24 (2006) 2013-2018