Intelligent hemodialysis: Toys or tools?

Hemodialysis International

Volumn 11, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2007, Pages

  Lambie, Stewart ^a   Warwick, Graham ^b  

^a RAIGMORE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b LEICESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adequacy; Blood volume; Hemodialysis; Monitoring; Vascular access

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT; UREA; VASODILATOR AGENT;

ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; ARTICLE; AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTION; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VOLUME; BODY POSTURE; BODY TEMPERATURE; BODY WEIGHT; DIALYSATE; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GLUCOSE INFUSION; GRAFT OCCLUSION; HEMATOCRIT; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; HYPERVOLEMIA; HYPOALBUMINEMIA; HYPOTENSION; HYPOXEMIA; KIDNEY CLEARANCE; KIDNEY FAILURE; PATIENT MONITORING; PROCESS MONITORING; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; TECHNOLOGY; THERMODILUTION; ULTRAFILTRATION; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASCULAR DISEASE; VASODILATATION; VENOUS PRESSURE;

EID: 34848821924     PISSN: 14927535     EISSN: 15424758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2007.00200.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Le Fanu J. The Rise and Fall of Modern Medicine. London: Abacus; 1999, p. 218.
2. National kidney foundation - K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access 2000. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000; 37:S137-S180 (http://www.kidney.org/professionals/kdoqi/guidelines.cfm).
3. Tordoir J, Canaud B, Haage P, et al. European best practice guidelines on haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007; 22(Suppl 2):iI88-ii117.
4. Kritviski NM. Theory and validation of access flow measurements by dilution technique during haemodialysis. Kidney Int. 1995; 48:244-250.
5. Paulson WD, Ram SJ, Birk CG, Work J. Does blood flow accurately predict thrombosis or failure of hemodialysis synthetic grafts? A meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999; 34:478-485.
6. McCarley P, Wingaard R, Shyr Y, et al. Vascular access blood flow monitoring reduces access morbidity and costs. Kidney Int. 2001; 60:1164-1172.
7. Tessitore N, Bedogna V, Gammaro L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound dilution access blood flow measurements and detecting stenosis and predicting thrombosis in native forearm arteriovenous fistulae for haemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003; 42:331-341.
8. Moist LM, Churchill DN, House AA, et al. Regular monitoring of access flow compared with monitoring of venous pressure fails to improve graft survival. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003; 14:2645-2653.
9. Ram SJ, Work J, Caldito GC, et al. A randomized controlled trial of blood flow and stenosis surveillance of hemodialysis grafts. Kidney Int. 2003; 64:272-280.
10. Shahin H, Reddy G, Sharafuddin M, et al. Monthly access flow monitoring with increased prophylactic angioplasty did not improve fistula patency. Kidney Int. 2005; 68:2352-2361.
11. Steuer RR, Leypoldt JK, Cheung AK, et al. Reducing symptoms during haemodialysis by continuously monitoring the haematocrit. Am J Kidney Dis. 1996; 27:525-532.
12. Lopot F, Kotyk P, Blaha J, et al. Use of continuous blood volume monitoring to detect inadequately high dry weight. Int J Artif Org. 1996; 19:411-414.
13. Reddan DR, Szczech LA, Hasselblad V, et al. Intradialytic blood volume monitoring in ambulatory hemodialysis patients: A randomized trail. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16:2162-2169.
14. Santoro A, Mancini E, Basile C, et al. Blood volume controlled haemodialysis in hypotension-prone patients: A randomised multi-center controlled trial. Kidney Int. 2002; 62:1034-1045.
15. McIntyre CW, Lambie SH, Fluck RJ. Biofeedback controlled haemodialysis (BF-HD) reduces symptoms and increase both haemodynamic tolerability and dialysis adequacy in non-hypotension prone stable patients. Clin Nephrol. 2003; 60:105-112.
16. Ronco C, Brendolan A, Milan M, et al. Impact of biofeedback-induced cardiovascular stability on haemodialysis tolerance and efficiency. Kidney Int. 2000; 58:800-808.
17. Gotch FA, Sargent JA. A mechanistic analysis of the national cooperative dialysis study (NCDS). Kidney Int. 1985; 28:526-534.
18. Lambie SH, Taal MW, Fluck RJ, McIntyre CW. Analysis of factors associated with variability in haemodialysis adequacy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004; 19:406-412.
19. Di Filippo S, Andrulli S, Manzoni C, et al. On-line assessment of delivered dialysis dose. Kidney Int. 1998; 54:263-267.
20. Goldau R, Kuhlmann U, Samadi N, et al. Ionic dialysance measurement is urea distribution volume dependent: A new approach to better results. Artif Organs. 2002; 26:321-332.
21. Petitclerc T, Goux N, Reynier AL, Bene B. A model for non-invasive estimation of in vivo dialyzer performances and patient's conductivity during hemodialysis. Int J Artif Organs. 1993; 8:585-591.
22. Watson PE, Watson ID, Batt RD. Total body water volumes for adult male and females estimated from simple anthropometric measurements. Am J Clin Nutr. 1980; 33:27-39.