Are Colonoscopies Performed in Private Offices Less Likely to Be Successful?

Gastroenterology

Volumn 133, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1390-

  Rubin, Raymond A ^a   Galambos, Michael R ^a  

^a Digestive Healthcare of Georgia   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL;

CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; HUMAN; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEDATION;

EID: 34848814115     PISSN: 00165085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.08.033     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Shah H.A., Paszat L.F., Saskin R., et al. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 132 (2007) 2297-2303
2. Rex D.K., Bond J.H., Winawer S., et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendation of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97 (2002) 1296-1308
3. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Doughty A.S., et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 2533-2541