Budget impact analyses get some respect

Value in Health

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 324-325

  Neumann, Peter J ^a  

^a TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH SERVICE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 34748922246     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00237.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1996.
2. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (3rd ed.). Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2005.
3. Mauskopf JA, Sullivan SD, Annemans L, et al. Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR task force on good research practice - budget impact analysis. Value Health 2007 DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733. 2007.00187.x.
4. Weinstein MC, O'Brien B, Hornberger H, et al. Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR task force on good research practices - modeling studies. Value Health 2003 6 : 9 17.
5. Ramsey S, Willke R, Briggs A, et al. Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA task force report. Value Health 2005 8 : 521 33.